| Lilith |
First of all...freakin' ouch. Is some sadist trying to make a dragonmarked tapestry? Eek.
Anyway, here is how I would rule it - mind you, I do not run an Eberron campaign nor do I consider myself an Eberron expert, so this is all my opinion. Dragonmarked heirs go beyond mere flesh and bone and no removal of said flesh will destroy that connection. Eventually, the dragonmarks will reappear on the flesh.
Again, my opinion.
| Uri Kurlianchik |
First of all...freakin' ouch. Is some sadist trying to make a dragonmarked tapestry? Eek.
Far, far worse... And no this question has no connection whatsoever to my upcoming adventure :)
So you folks think, that a dragonmark is not the source of the nagic but rather the expression of it? An interesting notion...
James Jacobs
Creative Director
|
Since a character has to spend a feat to get dragonmarked powers, they should not lose the effects of that feat if their dragonmark is "stolen" from them. The dragonmark powers remain in you even if your mark is removed; the mark might even surface on its own accord elsewhere on your body.
This is not to say that some powerful magical effect can't come into being that can steal or surpress dragonmarks. It's just not enogh, I think, to just be able to cancel the feat (or feats) out by simply physically removing the mark.
| Uri Kurlianchik |
Uri Kurlianchik wrote:Well, in a way I am using it... but I think our ideas are different enough for Dungeon to accept both.Ahh, I thought you were asking as a DM. My bad.
-Amber S.
Oh no, my players wouldn't let me run an Eberron campagin. They are old school purists (which stands somewhat like a contradiction to the fact that they play a group of run-of-the-mill Orcs who raid humans and fight for honor.)