![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Fox_Reeveheart |
![Cobalt Dragon](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/2_Cobalt-Dragon.jpg)
The mercury dragon was a great monster from 2nd edition and WOTC decided to screw it over with just a little thing of it on the website.
I know there are other dragons on the wotc site that were on the site but on the draconomicon, but i believe the mercury really needs to be in a new issue with full picture and all that goodness ^.^
Unless there is a new issue with that in it, but if not then please make one.
that would really make my day.
PS. My heart goes out to those other poor dragons. Mist Dragon, we feel your pain.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![Tentagard](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO9039-Tentagard.jpg)
I'm new and I have no clue to WHAT IS A MERCURY DRAGON?
Thanks,
Patrick
If you're new to D&D, check out dragons in the Monster Manual. You'll see five good metallic dragons and five evil chromatic (color) dragons.
A mercury dragon expands on that idea of metal type dragons. I don't know off the top of my head its breath weapon, but it would another type of metallic dragon.
We've seen a lot of new chromatic (evil) dragons and metallic (good) dragons in Dragon and elsewhere. Purple dragons, orange dragons, yellow dragons, mercury dragons, steel dragons, and many others.
In addition to metallic (good) and chromatic (evil) dragons in the MM, D&D has gem dragons which are neutral. Obviously they have scales that look like gems: sapphire, emerald etc.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Fox_Reeveheart |
![Cobalt Dragon](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/2_Cobalt-Dragon.jpg)
http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/mm/20040103a
thats the site that has all info on the mercury dragon
But what good is it if its just gonna sit around in a website and people will soon forget its there and it has no updated picture.
I suggest that there be another section of like 3-5 dragons like they did for the extraplanar dragons in Dragon Magazine #300, and on top of that i feel they should use the same person who did the illustrations (if he/she is still employed)because i honestly feel those were the best illustrations i have EVER seen.
So like the mercury dragon, steel dragon, cloud or mist dragon or some other dragons can be put into a couple page article in a upcoming issue hopefully.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Rowan |
I noticed how DMs in D&D nearly always put their players in dungeons but almost never let their players interact with dragons. So I'm going to DM a campaign that pays special attantion to dragons. Yes this sound like Dragonlance (of which I am a big fan). In fact, It is like Dragonlance TO THE MAX! heheh Sorry I just like doing that.