azoun's page

More than 3 years later, thank you so much Kain Darkwind for all the Lightless Depths monsters conversions... really good work !

It was most helpfull for me, you turned them all into very strong opponents, just the way I like :-)

** spoiler omitted **

** spoiler omitted **...

The ice devil's entrap should be some type of ice shard attack, or a frosty breath, or similar. I guess exactly how it's manifested is up to each individual GM.

I used a Mythic Ice Devil last night (in a customized Tomb of Aknar Ratalla adventure from Dungeon #119), and I tied its Entrap to its Cone of Cold with a cost of one use of mythic power.

The level 1 map does indeed say, right on the map, where the passage from level 1 ends up on level 2 (Area 25) and level 4 (Area 7). It does not say it in text, however.

Oh, so you merged those stairs if I get it right ?

Thank you DaveMage for checking out, too bad it didn't get fixed...

Azoun: I'm not going to say we got 100% of all errata; I'm sure there is something wrong in there somewhere. I have yet to see a 100% flawless product, from any publisher. I do know that all compiled errata has been fixed, so anything I'm aware of is fixed in the new version.

When I wrote "100% reliable" it was of course in regard to the errata from the previous version of ToA, I surely understand that every product comes with some errors no matter how much hardwork you deliver on it !

Still you don't answer about the 4th level access bug in ToA... if I'm asking about it, it's because it's the most annoying mistake I faced while running ToA.

Sorry if I insinst, but for me a revised and updated version should be clean on such issues.

azoun wrote:

Does the Stoneheart Valley include the Tomb of Abysthor errata ? (http://necromancergames.yuku.com/topic/5453/Tomb-of-Abysthor-Errata?page=2 #.UsR2_NLuLmc)

Like the missing stairs in level 4 from level 1, are such things right in the new version (text and maps) ?

Thanks !

We fixed all the errata we could find...(I hope)! lol

Your answer is pretty vague... but I guess you're still recovering from the mega New Year's party with Orcus, Thyr, and Muir ;-)

I'm running the Tomb of Abysthor (my favorite from Necromancer Games by the way, so thank you !), it's been more than a year and a half with a nice classic team (fighter/barbarian/rogue/cleric/wizard), and level 4 seems to be the next place the PCs will set foot on... clearly a possible TPK, as everything could go wrong with a bad save, but that's what we love !

I'm playing under Pathfinder rules, so switching to Stoneheart Valley would definitely make sense, but only if the new product is 100% reliable ! I hope you can give me a more precise answer so I can click on the purchase button without hesitation !

How urgently do you guys want a review of this one? More urgently than for RC? Or less? Because I need to decide which of the big FGG-endeavor I'll tackle next.

I definitely would love a review for Stoneheart Valley, as I'm still running the original Tomb of Abysthor but playing with Pathfinder rules :-)

I still hesitate to pick up the updated version, maybe your review could help ;-)

Does the Stoneheart Valley include the Tomb of Abysthor errata ? (http://necromancergames.yuku.com/topic/5453/Tomb-of-Abysthor-Errata?page=2 #.UsR2_NLuLmc)

Like the missing stairs in level 4 from level 1, are such things right in the new version (text and maps) ?

Thanks !

I would love to get a copy, thanks for your work !

yeah, it really slowed my game too ! time to react at last and face the evil typos of the PRD !

There seems to be an error in the PRD with the Reach entry for the Girallon:

Space 10 ft.; Reach 19 ft.

Reach should be 10 ft. as per the errata document.

option B for me, definitely !

Al Qadim material would be so nice, maybe an article about religion in the land of fate, with the main gods, their domains, and the different kinds of clerics....

thank you fot this feat by feat analysis :-)

i think i'll use some of your adjustments...

hey there,

Dragon # 340 (february 2006) has a bunch of feats designed for the "opportunists", i.e. characters who want to focus on Attacks of Opportunity...

The various feats allow such characters to increase the frequency of the AoO (by granting you one on actions that usually don't), to deal a big lot of damage on a successful one (making an AoO a sneak attack), and so on...

While these feats are really well thought IMHO, I'm affraid they're a bit (well, ok, a lot !) overpowered...

For those who've read these feats (and of course those who show interest in this thread !), what do you think of them ? are they unbalanced ?

thanx

Thanx, Neomorte. I heard the same on the WotC board.

Anyway i find it very strange (and lame) that no official clarification has been given.

hey,

please, please, please ! help me with the erudite class by Bruce Cordell (from dragon #319)... can an erudite learn discipline power other wise than with the the Expanded Knowledge feat ???

Is it errata when it is written "If the power is not on his class list or is a discipline power, he automatically fails his check" ???

thanx for answering.