Current group... Expedition to Castle Ravenloft... The party is moving toward the church to stop the inevitable zombie apocalypse. The DM tells us we hear hoarse chanting. In response, I made horse noises. Which got the group giggling every time chanting was mentioned. The DM got me back. We found the priest's diary. When we went to read it...he made horse noises.
Matthew Koelbl wrote:
They had that. It was called skills, feats, and background. Matthew Koelbl wrote: 2) Having monsters that are easy to run, but with unique and interesting abilities and flavor. Umm... i don't know about any of you, but I don't hold conversations with the goblins before I kill them. Why do they need interesting abilities, flavor, and to be unique. Has anyone stopped to ask their motivations before they're ambushed by the little buggers? Matthew Koelbl wrote: 3) Simplified mechanics, allowing for more emphasis on story and character. We had that. It's called White Wolf WoD
We've got threads on books you're reading and suggestions for books, but my question is... What book disappointed you the most? For me it was Stephen King and Peter Straub's Black House. I loved the other book they wrote together, The Talisman. And consider that one of my favorite books of all time. And after seeing reviews, I was expecting a lot from this book. And the first part of the book delivered. It was suspenseful, terrifying, and very much a page turner. My issues came about at the end... Spoiler: when you find out the child murder isn't the real bad guy. No the 'real bad guy' is Mr. Munshun. Who has a 5ft long head (most of his body is head) and one eye. Maybe it's just me, but I couldn't get the idea that he was a silly foam rubber monster from the 1st season of Power Rangers. NOT scary. As a matter of fact, when the heroes confront the terrible, evil, puppet-head man, he tries to talk them into letting him go.
Without him the book was much more scary. The idea of a territories hopping, child killing, cannibal was much scarier than Rita Repulsa's flunkie.
I have 4. A crescent moon with a face on my ankle (for when I moved out on my own), an anhk on my arm (for when I stopped drugs), one of those red circle x-men symbols (long story... don't regret it though. it's my geek mark), and two leo symbols intertwined (one roses and vines one tribal...female with a male star sign...duality kinda thing) They all mean something to me. I have plans to get more. Including one that is a strength (tarot) card a friend drew for a job (but with input to make it personal for me)
MonstermattXL wrote:
The issue is you don't know us. You don't know how much experience any of us has or how many systems we've owned/played. So yes, you are talking down to us and saying you're better than us. I'd wager that many more of us have the same experience you do and the same 'breadth of knowledge' than you think there are. Personally, with that fact, I'd rather use the knowledge and experience of people who are not being insulting and uppity, than one who is.
Logos wrote:
You obviously don't understand marketing at all. Just because something is offensive to one person, doesn't mean it is to all. Bad PR won't IMMEDIATELY put a company under, they'll still make sales. And new coke is still sold in parts of the country, or was for years after it's debut. My aunt prefers it to old coke. But I digress. (following example is HIGHLY offensive. It is meant as an example and not to offend anyone in particular.) Let's say a popular fast food chain puts out a new commercial. In this commercial, they use swearing, vulgar hand motions, and one african-american is called a particularly insulting racial slur. Now, just because the ad has been released, doesn't mean everyone has seen it. Or that everyone's offended. The fast food chain will not IMMEDIATELY stop getting sales. The backlash will take time. In the case of WotC, it's not that they've sold games. It's how many? It's about how many would have bought the game and didn't because of PR? I know a lot of people who were excited about it. Hell, I was willing to see before that grapple video. So it had nothing to do with staying with 3.x or going to 4e. That was the end of the line for 4e, no matter what it had in it.
Honestly, I'm glad everyone wasn't insulted by the ad. However, for the ones that were, sometimes that's all it takes. Would you be likely to buy a hair product that's commercial blatantly told you that not only could you not read the directions of other products, but that you could not even find the directions? Most people wouldn't I would think. The same is true for the ad. Sure the fake bad french accent was humorous. But the constant insinuation that the people who played previous editions couldn't find their ass from a hole in the ground (and I have many ranks in Distinguish Ass from Hole in Ground) was horribly insulting to the people who had put their hard earned money into a company for years, some decades.
Jeremy Mac Donald wrote:
I think that you missed the first part of their marketing. Posters, saying it's a better addition. That's like Kraft saying their mac and cheese is now cheesier. It's advertising. Word of mouth, maybe but advertising. But the first marketing they had was a promo video in which they insinuated that people who played the previous editions were so stupid they could not read or follow the rules that are pretty simple in the books. Having played AD&D and 3.x, I know I can find the rule in books that I have used for years. And for that matter can find the index and table of contents. Something the video makes perfectly clear they DO NOT think we can do. So yes, I'm offended. Please don't call me stupid then expect me to shell out my hard earned money to you. No, thank you. (Disclaimer: anger directed toward WoTC for their bad marketing decisions. NOT at other posters. Enjoy your game.)
Jeremy Mac Donald wrote:
Any chance to use email. have them create their characters and any questions can go through the internet? then you can approve them as you go along.
Let them create their own characters. If you can do it as a group activity, great. If you need a point buy calculator Try this one provided 4e uses the same table as 3.5. I've found it highly useful and you can give them each a couple minutes to try it out. From experience, when I first started I didn't even have a book. The DM made my character. What resulted was a serious snafu in confusion because I didn't know my character had rope. (In my defense, it was listed as a standard starting kit. Without a book, no clue what that included!) But if you let them make their own characters (My 8 yr old just helped create his first character recently), they know their characters abilities much better than a pregen one.
Welcome Ms. Cunningham. I haven't read any of your books yet, but they're in my bookself waiting their turn. Unfortunately I'm years behind and yard sales and Goodwill books haven't helped me catch up. Back to the topic. WoTC boards tended to be very flammable. I was nearly banned from the Community boards. Apparently an all female relationship that was far more chaste than any of the male/female ones was far too offensive to be allowed.
Aberzombie wrote:
Actually it's methane. Hence the cows and the anal probes. They're mining.
Ok. Just saw this movie today. First things first....if you have any photosensitivty or get virtigo, wait for video. There were times in the movie where I just couldn't follow what was happening right then because of it. I have to agree that the character development was sorely lacking. No real explanation of the backstory. Or who or what they were. Very much more action movie than a movie with a cohesive plot.
Hydro wrote:
French Fries are potato murder! That's why you put ketchup on them... it's like fake blood on furs.
evilvolus wrote:
Mmmm godiva martinis (chocohol :p )
CourtFool wrote:
Strange, somehow I knew it was personal. :p
|