|
![]() ![]()
![]() James Jacobs wrote: I'm 100% sure we'll never do anything with nilbogs. But wacky surprises are fun! (Just kidding, I could care less if we have nilbogs. I think they're an early interesting step in the maturation of the game from the early days to where we are now. 1st Edition had unusual ideas in terms of what made a good monster, and in some cases a lot of cool material was reverse engineered from something that started out as just a visual effect (ropers for example).. and in some cases it didn't, like the nilbog.) ![]()
![]() It's time to kill this thread again by mentioning the nilbog. (Because any mention if nilbogism, as it was described in terms of a disease in the 1st edition of the Fiend Folio, is guaranteed thread pesticide) Save the nilbog.
Well I don't know why I came here tonight
![]()
![]() Hugo Solis wrote:
It's a shame the nilbog doesn't look any sillier than a goblin. All joking aside, the nilbog is the King of the Monsters of Suck. I almost want people to hate it so that it can be saved. The problem is the nilbog is only silly in premise and mechanics, not appearance... unlike the Flumph. ![]()
![]() Well there's a little nilbog raisin' hell inside of a corner shop
Well there's an ugly flumph floating behind the counter of a corner shop
Take a step back and see the little monsters
Now we're standin' on the corner of a world gone home
What about me?
|