![]()
![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() Two-level adventures as listed, with no apparent overlap could cause issues. As described, there are level 1-2 and 3-4 adventures, but no 2-3; so 2nd and 3rd level characters cannot be at the same table. Imagine that you have a group of friends who go to a regular event together, always playing the same characters. One of them misses one of the first six games (assuming three games to a level), and is now still second level whilst the others are all already 3rd. They can't play together next time; and will have to go through hoops levelling that one character to catch up. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() Pixel Popper wrote:
Except that alchemical ammo deactivates it it is not fired by the dnd of the turn that it is activated. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() That's not how Pathfinder darts work; they are not "ammunition", which is single use, but thrown weapons (think knives) which can be gathered up and reused. As an aside, I THINK that you're taking your idea of the darts from the Roman pilum, they're actually plumbata. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() Not a happy situation for anyone. The only thought that comes to mind is regarding you comment on "slowing things down"; if it can help things fit into the time that the venue allows better, maybe try Quests rather than full adventures? This might help some with attention span too. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() "Explorer’s Clothing: Adventurers who don’t wear armor travel in durable clothing. Though it’s not armor and uses your unarmored defense proficiency, it still has a Dex Cap and can grant an item bonus to AC if etched with potency runes (as described on page 226 of GM Core)." Player Core page 272. "Explorer’s clothing can have armor runes etched on it even though it’s not armor, but because it’s not in the light, medium, or heavy armor category, it can’t have runes requiring any of those categories." GM Core page 224. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() Julien Dien wrote: Helpful to me, too. Please take into account that this ruling is now over 10 years old, and referenced 1st edition which, obviously, doesn't have a "rarity" system. From the Lorespire (Purchasing/Spells);
![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() Not an errata as such, but something that should be included as a footnote. Bottomless Pit, GM Core page 101.
(Not bad for a level 9 hazard. :) ) ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() efildam wrote:
If you are choosing to Rebuild you basically recreate your character from first principles, advance it appropriate to the XP it previously had, and then spend gold calculated from the table on the linked page. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() Anyone else looked critically at the map on page 14? According to the description on page 15 says that the cavern is 2 miles by 4 miles. Judging by the scale in the corner of the map on page 14 it should be 300 miles by 500 miles! Quick math says that (assuming that the description is the correct one) the scale bar should read 0.8 miles (about 1400 yards), which os a really strange number for a scale.but then not as weird as a 15 mile wide cattle pen (A15). There have been too many screw-ups with the maps in this Adventure Path. ![]()
![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() Given that the 1st Edition Iconic psychic Rivani was clearly modelled on a south Asian woman, and a few years ago one of Pazio higher-ups (can't recall which at this time) made a big point about seeing a young south-Asian girl and her mother staring open mouthed at the huge poster of Rivani at Gen Con and how important that the representation was, why the change in direction? ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() Alex Speidel wrote:
OK, I accept that you may be joking, but; even in your image that is the wing-clips on the back of the pin. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() Suspicion, page 17;
Nothing actually says what the penalty/bonus actually is. Making it equal to the point value seems a little extreme, as the table that accompanies it allows for it to exceed 20. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() Leon Aquilla wrote: Maybe a lagofir is an otter + rabbit but the writer is assuming you're unfamiliar with otters? "Lagofirs are semiaquatic omnivores that resemble a rabbit the size of a large dog. ... Lagofirs have a stout body, rounded back, large hind legs, long ears, and a short, fluffy tail. Their powerful incisors are capable of cracking through clam shells, chitin, and bone" The picture is literally an otter with floppy rabbit ears. It's even eating a fish. Body does widen slightly towards the hips, but front and back legs seem similar lengths. Long, wet, furry otter's tail. Small, pointy teeth with long canines (you know, for catching and eating fish), rather than rodent incisors. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() Nefreet wrote: It's still a thing. Thank you! (I swear that that site gets harder to navigate every time I visit it.) ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() Mark Moreland wrote: I will note that the House of Fabergé is not a canonical Taldan noble family, but the old woman in the story may be well-traveled enough to have visited some other place where such a house exists. Maybe her grandson swiped it, and she picked it up? ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() I don't know if this is just me, though I have tried using multiple devices. Any time I try to add a pdf to an order, the page returns "your request produced an error" on the line where the price was. This makes it a bit difficult to take advantage of the spring sale... ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() James Jacobs wrote:
Corollary to this question: would you be interested in knowing that they have just started releasing a similar adaption of The Whisperer in Darkness? ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
![]() I let the group decide who was taking each turn for the PCs. (So, count, PCs, count, PCs, count... etc.) It generally resulted in one or other of them taking the first couple of rounds, and then the 18 CHA bard coming in to finish him off. As I read it you only apply the -2 to a skill if it successfully used to finish an exchange, not every time you use it. This is separate to the -2 penalty for countering a tactic with the same tactic. |