|
Beroli's page
35 posts. Organized Play character for Kish.
|
Have you ever had a large fluffy cat insist on sitting in front of your monitor and purring loudly, because she doesn't like that you were out yesterday?
...I can't imagine why that question came to mind...get down, again, Underfoot...
James Jacobs wrote: Sporkedup wrote: Interesting. I never knew the term "mage" was so tied to AD&D! Personally I'm a huge fan of Pathfinder using its own terminology for as many things as possible.
If you could do away with one big holdover term from D&Ds of yesteryear (that you weren't able to talk folks out of with PF2 yet), what would it be? Alignment. As in people would not be classified as good or evil anymore, or as in it would be called something else?
Why is there a month named after Lamashtu?
Or more precisely, is there an in-setting reason why the Golarion calendar has 11 original deities, 0 deities who ascended from mortality, and 1 ascended demon lord? Or was the calendar created before all the deities' origins were sorted out?
James Jacobs wrote:
And yeah, I'm about to finish up chapter one of Wrath! It's VERY fun!
Are there bugs?
(I have the game; I backed it on Kickstarter. I'm just not sure whether to start playing it already, or wait for a patch.)
Are any other adventure paths likely to get 2ed versions?
James Jacobs wrote:
I have zero interest going forward in ever publishing something that looks like it's Paizo saying something like "You can play a slaver or a serial killer or worse and here are rules for it". Interesting. So nothing like Hell's Vengeance is in the future?
Do you have an off-the-cuff estimate for how many people are in Cheliax's standing army (or equivalent thereof)? That is, how many people Queen Abrogail could put in the field (assuming the various independent Hellknight orders weren't interested in getting involved for whatever reason)?
Disclaimers: I'm not looking for anything elaborate; if this question is a problem, I won't be offended if you decline to answer it; I promise not to argue with you about any answer you give.
James Jacobs wrote:
I'm much more interested in talking about my favorite campaign settings, and the Forgotten Realms is in my top five of those favorites.
What are the other four?
Are you looking forward to finding out what Owlcat Games has planned for her?
What's your least favorite alignment? Actually, how would you rank all nine alignments?
Seen on the Kingmaker computer game's reddit: "Also, Amiri had Paizo straight up tell Owlcat she couldn't be a romance option because she's an iconic."
True, or another false rumor?
(That is, if this is unclear: Did Paizo tell Owlcat that they couldn't/shouldn't make Amiri a romanceable character in the computer game?)
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
James Jacobs wrote: Rysky wrote: How involved with the Wrath game are you going to be? About the same as I was with Kingmaker. I'll be involved with approvals and helping to guide things along but won't be writing any of the new content or actually making the the game a game. Are you looking forward to it?
Which Hellknight Orders do you like (if any)?
Sorry, let me try to rephrase for greater clarity.
Would it be accurate to say that Hellknight orders have a conceptual moral ceiling, in that they are all able to function in Cheliax with none of them being immediately compelled by their code to, e.g., dedicate themselves to supporting the Bellflower Network (and thus none take a more condemnatory attitude toward slavery than "able to look the other way")?
If the question's still confusing, feel free to just say it's still confusing and I'll drop it; this is, after all, just my idle curiosity.
Would it be accurate to say that every Hellknight order is, at best, able to function in areas where slavery is legal without conflicting with the local authorities?
Something is being passed around reddit as fact that I find...implausible.
Has Paizo placed an in-world-chronological limit on Owlcat Games' future ability to make computer games from adventure paths?
That is: Has Paizo told them "any future game you make cannot be set earlier than Kingmaker"?
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
James Jacobs wrote:
Chaos and Good because those would have been required (lame).
Wait, _Good_? (Guessing that's an error, but checking to verify that 2ed-Nocticula is still CN.)
When is he likely to show up again? Next year, the year after that, no future plans involving him yet?
James Jacobs wrote:
Guttugger is a personal easter egg from my many years of playing World of Warcraft, where my first and favorite character was and remains Shensen, who DOES have a pet raptor named Guttugger.
Night elf, blood elf, or Other?
Amaranthine Witch wrote: I think I'm not explaining what I mean well enough (english is my 3rd language, sorry). I mean, if the PC's of Rise of the Runelords continued the campaing claiming Xin-Shalast and/or delegations from the varisian city-states moved there, how would Sorshen deal with that in establishing New Thassilon? If I can help out here, I believe what Amarenthine Witch is saying is: The "Continuing the Campaign" section of Rise of the Runelords suggests that the PCs might want to, effectively, colonize Xin-Shalast. If that happens, in that GM's timeline, immediately after Rise of the Runelords and before Return of the Runelords, Sorshen does not have an empty wilderness to claim unchallenged.

James Jacobs wrote: RH wrote: James Jacobs wrote: For D&D, my favorite setting is Greyhawk. There's a LOT of Greyhawk DNA in Golarion. I also quite enjoyed Forgotten Realms, Mystara, Dark Sun, and Planescape. How did you feel about Ravenloft? LOVE the original adventure, and quite like the second adventure.
I like the concept of it as a setting, and some elements of the setting are cool... but I'm not a fan of how it uses rules as a shortcut to establish horror and forces people and NPCs to get trapped in the realm.
Ustalav is how I'd do something like that. AKA: Make it a region in a world where you can explore those themes, not a closed-off hard to get to hard to escape from demiplane. Do you have an opinion on the Expedition to Castle Ravenloft hardcover? (No demiplane, no universal trapping though Strahd's likely to have an opinion on whether the PCs specifically get to leave while he's still undead, no fear/horror/madness checks unless the DM chooses to site it on the Ravenloft demiplane, and even there the DM needs to come up with them unaided by the text.)
James Jacobs wrote:
A divine sorcerer COULD be an atheist, but that feels like a choice someone might make just to be petulant, honestly.
In or out of character? (That is, would the player be the petulant one, or the divine sorcerer atheist?)
Who should I consider primarily responsible for the War for the Crown adventure path in general and City in the Lion's Eye in specific?
Okay. What's your take on shabti being for? Do they cause an automatic resurrection when someone dies?

James Jacobs wrote: Beroli wrote: What happens to a soul that has a shabti crafted for it? It escapes judgment and the shabti goes to the afterlife it otherwise would have; does that mean it reincarnates, it dissolves, it wanders the planes forever? It's treated the same as any other soul once it dies. From the cycle of souls, it's closer to reincarnate than undeath as far as Pharasma cares, but someone who uses this option over and over will eventually annoy her or the psychopomps enough to go on THE LIST. I'm not sure I follow. In The Dead Roads, there's a character, Reedreaper, who was crafted as a shabti for a man who 1) had unambiguously earned Abaddon, and 2) was dead when Reedreaper was crafted. The entire purpose of crafting Reedreaper was to save that man from Abaddon without resurrecting him (because his family didn't actually want him back, just not in Abaddon). Reedreaper went to Abaddon. What happened to the man who he was crafted to save from Abaddon? The same as any other soul would suggest he went to Abaddon and the existence of a shabti did nothing.
What happens to a soul that has a shabti crafted for it? It escapes judgment and the shabti goes to the afterlife it otherwise would have; does that mean it reincarnates, it dissolves, it wanders the planes forever?
Why is Reign of Winter experimental? (I can guess "evil" and "technology" in the other two cases; I got nothing for Reign of Winter.)
Who's the Cheliax specialist?
I meant good-aligned; there's no shortage of demons who are all about lust (even not counting Nocticula anymore), but it seems unpopular among good-aligned figures.
Shelyn? Really? She's the goddess of love and art, and it says in her description in Faiths of Purity: "Followers of Shelyn endeavor to make themselves beautiful, though not necessarily arousing--lust is the purview of Calistria, and while Shelyn's no prude, she knows the difference between true love and mere carnal attraction." That looks pretty inherently dependent on love to me. Am I missing something?
Who's the most positive divine figure who unambiguously represents lust/sex--not inherently dependent on love or marriage or fertility?
This is from the Oracle description: Although the gods work through many agents, perhaps none is more mysterious than the oracle. These divine vessels are granted power without their choice, selected by providence to wield powers that even they do not fully understand. Unlike a cleric, who draws her magic through devotion to a deity, oracles garner strength and power from many sources, namely those patron deities who support their ideals. Instead of worshiping a single source, oracles tend to venerate all of the gods that share their beliefs.
So that's not the class I was looking for. Which class would be appropriate for something like the reverse--someone who derives power from faith in one god who didn't give them power in advance of their faith developing (Iomedae specifically in this context), but lacks formal religious education and isn't part of that god's church? (Is there one, or have I described a character who wouldn't exist in Pathfinder?)
Quote function keeps picking up the wrong post.
Will Return of the Runelords have the player-relevant mechanics about Nocticula--i.e., what domains Nocticula the Goddess offers to worshipers? Or if not, do you know yet where they will show up?
Is there any book where I could find a negative/critical view of Aroden that isn't in-character by an Asmodean (in-character by an Iomedaen, for example, would be fine)? In what I've read, he seems somewhat perplexingly universally admired for a Lawful Neutral god who massively favored one race.
In Hell's Vengeance 5: Scourge of the Godclaw, a plot point/exploitable weakness of one ex-paladin NPC is that her son was taken prisoner, entirely unwillingly "given to Asmodeus," and is now in Hell.
In light of your having said earlier that you can't sell someone's soul unless they consent, I'm thinking this should be regarded as an authorial error. Is that correct?
|