![]() ![]()
![]() Medesha wrote: As someone who has some ecology articles coming out (and hopes to write more in the future), I found this really interesting. I'd like to add more of this type thing to any future articles the editors are kind and benevolent enough to let me write. Are there any more opinions on Ecology articles and what they should contain? My opinion of the necessary requirements of a great Ecology article: 1) The standard History, Psychology, and society information.2) Versus information 3) One or two plot springboards for the DM or player to use in a character history. I know the focus is supposed to be on the player but if the DM is not inspired enough to use the creature then it won’t be very helpful for the player. An Example: Say the medusa race is all female. (I know some people say they are and some say they are not but it is beside the point.) The Ecology article for this would include talk of how they manage to have offspring with humans. Then in a sidebar or right there in the article mention that there is a legend in medusa culture that talks of one day a male medusa being born and he will unite his people or something like that. A small mention but can be used by the DM to make something more out of it. 4) At least one “I did not know that” fact about the creature. Some distinct fact about the creature that you may not know by just glancing at a stat block and a picture. An example of this would be from The Slayers Guide to Troglodytes book. It details that Troglodytes have extreme sexual dimorphism. The male and female members of the race are extremely different. The males are what you see in the MM, but the females are smaller and walk on all fours. It also says that adventurers are usually wondering where the females are because the females will be mistaken as a separate species. I just want to say that I hope no one was offended by that example about the Troglodytes. I would have found it just as shocking if the genders were switched. But I think those last two requirements are absolutely necessary to make for an article that will get a second glance from the reader. ![]()
![]() Tracy Taylor wrote: Actually, that's kind of good to know as I have a Slaad ecology into Dragon that will hopefully see the light of day. As for some of the others, I think they would be kind of neat, but maybe a little difficult to do in the 2,500 word alotment, particularly the aquatic elves. But who knows, maybe someone has written it and it will appear soon. A Slaad article would rock. I have been curious about the slaad lords--Ssendam and Ygorl. They were only breifly mentioned in the Manual of the Planes. Not that they would be the topic of the article though, but any information would be cool. I understand that some creatures would be harder to write for than others, but some of the hardest might make for some of the coolest articles. ![]()
![]() Chef's Slaad wrote:
Thanks, that thought occurred to shortly after I made that post. That would definitely be a problem. ![]()
![]() Medesha wrote:
Yeah, It comes out once a month. But I meant it would be nice for them to cover a non-standard class once an issue, once every other issue, or whenever they can fit it in. Maybe I should of said 'once in a while' sorry. ![]()
![]() I decided to start this thread to let people say what creatures they would like to see in Ecology but first I would like to say that usually the Ecology articles have been a little bland. If the whole article is just a bunch of generic information that any DM would of wrote if given the chance then it can be a very boring read. I am just saying some of the ecology articles need some more 'That is interesting' factors to it. And for those factors not to brushed aside in one sentence but maybe elaborated maybe in a sidebar or something if it would mean making assumptions that the author did not want to make in his main article. That said. Here is what I would like to see as topics of an Ecology article. --Aquatic Elves
Just to name a few. ![]()
![]() Is it also possible to do a Dragonlance article? Now I know someone is going to say there was one in Dragon 315. But how about a new one? With the current developments on Krynn and according to the Wizards Conclave novel, wizards and sorcerers are going to becoming into major conflict. This could make for an interesting versus article that if written just right should be easily transferred to any campaign setting. Just a suggestion though. Any Dragonlance article would be nice. Also, in case anyone did not know there was bonus content for the Dragonlance article from Dragon 315 posted at http://www.dragonlance.com/products/enhancements/10001.aspx ![]()
![]() Razz wrote:
I agree it might be nice once a month or so to do a wild card class and pick one from Razz's list. I would like to see more on the Urban Druid, Psion, and Shugenja. In that order. Awsome suggestion Razz. ![]()
![]() Favorite Issues: Dragon 280: It had an article with a bunch of cool Alchemy items. Dragon 289: The article about Leveled Treasures is a favorite in my group. Dragon: 297: It had an article about para-elemental planetouched. Dragon: 298: A Drow issue. Now I am one of the first to say that Drow usually get too much attention and I was thinking it when I got this issue in, but it was a really good issue all together. Dragon: 300: The Minions of Darkness article was awesome. It had monster cultist prestige classes. My favorite was the Deep Thrall. Dragon 313: It had an article about a new race--Ghost Elves. Dragon 317: Lots of great articles. True Names and Fetishes, Using Power Components, Body of Knowledge, and the Urban Druid. I love the artwork for the Urban Druid. I really gave me a sense on what the class was. Also the ability to eventually have a gargantuan monstrous spider as a companion is just awesome. I will stop there. There are many more that I would label my favorite articles and issues but these are the ones that came off the top of my head. ![]()
![]() OK, this has been bothering me for awhile now and maybe someone can help me by shedding some light on this. In Dungeon issue 107, there is a Critical Threats article about Evard. THE Evard of Evard's black tentacles. In his stat block he is wearing 7 rings! There is then an asterisk saying these rings have no space limitation. What I am confused about is why. The DMG says you can only get the benefits of two magical rings at a time. No where else in the article is this explained. My only guess is that Evard must have had special rings made that do not take up a space slot. Does anyone else have a better suggestion? Maybe the Dungeon staff since they wrote the article? Any info would be great. I have just been curious about this one for a while. ![]()
![]() Unlike Dragon, I think Dungeon got it right on the first try. A low, medium, and high adventure in each issue is perfect. The addition of some articles to help support the DM was a good idea. So everything is perfect but that does not mean that I do not have requests.
Thanks again for the changes. ![]()
![]() I agree with Cymraegmorgan, SG-1 managed to pull it off after I thought they wrote themselves into a corner with promoting Jack. Atlantis IS showing promise, but I am concerned that the Wraith lack the depth to make for a long standing recurring villain. But only time will tell. Besides does every major villain have to have a symbiotic relationship with humans on the StarGate shows? One of my favorite shows is Nip/Tuck on FX. While not SF, it is a dark satire. No one on that show every gets to experience happiness for very long. It is definitely worth at least one watch. ![]()
![]() I would LOVE to bring tokens back. First I would like them to come with the magazine again, but a download in a pdf would be better than nothing. I know everyone is pushing minis and I do own a few boxes but I have been screwed pretty badly with multiples. At least with tokens I know what I am getting, I will have a greater variety, they are easy to store, and is easy to transport in mass quantities unlike minis. Maps for the players would be great. Also, any player handouts would be a big help. Throwing some of the art in there might be helpful for visual aids, especially if it is of the NPCs in the issue. Lastly providing NPCs stats in a text file would be helpful. So I could just cut and past them in to my game notes and make any necessary changes right there. ![]()
![]() First I want to say I love Dragon and I have faith that you guys will fine to the Magazine to so that as many people as possible are happy. That said, here are my opinions:
Has Potential but did not care for this issue:
Did not like:
I know there were a few more articles but I only wanted to talk about the ones that I liked, disliked, or saw potential in. Thanks for listening to what I had to say. I know that the guys at Dragon can fine tune their changes. I am definitely curious on how it will affect the upcoming issues. One last opinion: Themed Issues Rock!!! Bring them Back. |