First!

[Arkat]

nt

[Lord Fyre]

Arkat wrote:

nt

But do you actually know anyting about this new AP?

[zimmerwald1915]

Lord Fyre wrote:

Arkat wrote:

nt

But do you actually know anyting about this new AP?

It may involve the breaking of a hell.

[W E Ray]

It looks (superficially) like a second helping of Hell's Rebels taking place in Isger instead of NW Cheliax. Um. With a little extra Urgathoa.

[Dragonchess Player]

Based on the product description it sounds like Hellbreakers (and later Hell's Destiny) may essentially be continuing the events of the Eagle Knights' capture of Breachill and Citadel Altaerein (mentioned in Battlecry!).

This is speculation on my part, but Breachill and Citadel Altaerein were also the starting points for Age of Ashes so the aiudara (elf gates) underneath Citadel Altaerein and Dahak (who has ties to Hell, IIRC) may make appearances.

[zimmerwald1915]

Dragonchess Player wrote:

This is speculation on my part, but Breachill and Citadel Altaerein were also the starting points for Age of Ashes so the aiudara (elf gates) underneath Citadel Altaerein and Dahak (who has ties to Hell, IIRC) may make appearances.

They should, but (per the Inner Sea War predictions thread) they won't.

[Lord Fyre]

zimmerwald1915 wrote:

Dragonchess Player wrote:

This is speculation on my part, but Breachill and Citadel Altaerein were also the starting points for Age of Ashes so the aiudara (elf gates) underneath Citadel Altaerein and Dahak (who has ties to Hell, IIRC) may make appearances.

They should, but (per the Inner Sea War predictions thread) they won't.

I keep finding my decision to ignore all Pathfinder after War For The Crown to be the right one.