|
| 9 people marked this as a favorite. |
I get that we want the -01 scenario highlighted as an intro so it will help encourage new players, but the way that info is being used is confusing, creating problems with scheduling and GMs knowing what they are running. Neither of the product pages for the intro games in either active campaign indicates that the intros are also -01. You only see that if you click on the cover image to enlarge it and read the title block. It wouldn't be so bad if we hadn't already established a line of "intro" scenarios that don't have seasonal numbering. There is no reason to expect that people will consider the newest intro scenarios to be anything other than a continuation of those. As an example, a convention I recently volunteered to GM for had the SFS intro listed as "Intro 3" because, of course they would. It's clearly an intro and its the third one. Why would they jump to the conclusion that it was also 4-01?
Please rename them to clarify the intent. Something simple like:
#3-01 Intro: Year of Shattered Sanctuaries
#4-01 Intro: Year of the Data Scourge
This simple update would clarify the issue while still conveying the information intended.
