Primal Hunter Companion--Unchained or Regular Evolutions?

[Captain Pridbor the Bitahson]

I've been playing a Primal Hunter Companion (Hunter Archetype) in Society Play as of the last year. May or may not be my well into retired -1. However something occurs to me as I look it over that, I may of assumed something wrong.

So the Primal Hunter Companion (PCH), grants Evolutions instead of Animal Focus. These evolutions have to be activated as a swift action, and last for a minute per activation.

I have assumed due to summoner being illegal, that the Unchained Eidolon Evolutions where the evolutions we would have to use. The PCH was originally designed to work with the original summoner, was temporarily banned in society, and is now back in legality.

I assumed because Summoner itself was banned that the regular Eidolon evolutions where not legal-but that my choices had to come from the Unchained Eidolon.

I was writing up a little something about the PCH, when I realized that I could be wrong and I should just triple check my resources. After going over additional resources, and doing a quick google and forum search I've found no clear answer. Summoner itself is banned, but nothing seems to indicate the Eidolon evolutions themselves. I'm also not seeing anything suggesting I should be using the Unchained evolutions as opposed to the regular.

I just made a logical conclusion.

So is there a way to get some clarification on this? Anyone able to find those beautiful little words hidden away somewhere? OR... am I wrong and regular evolutions are actually intended with this archetype? Or am I right and one should be using the unchained? Heck am I overlooking an obvious post and or ruling somewhere? Would be embarrassing if I am. Ha ha ha.

[blahpers]

Looks legit to me. Rivethun emissaries are called out as selecting evolutions from the unchained summoner's eidolon rules, but there is no such stipulation for primal companion hunters. Go forth with confidence--at least until someone reports it up the chain and it gets banned.

[Cavall]

If your are using unchained summoner in your games, I think it's a logical progression to use the unchained choices for the class as well.

In the end that's gm choice.

[blahpers]

OP was asking about PFS rules. (I've flagged the thread for moving to the PFS forum, as you're more likely to get a more authoritative answer there.)

[Cavall]

Well fair enough. In a PFS I would say it's almost assured it would be unchained