Does the Warlord benefit from his own Tactical Presence?
Also Unbreakable Gambit makes no sense to me.
"Unbreakable Gambit
Risk: the Warlord attempts to succeed on a Fortitude or Will save against an extraordinary ability, maneuver, power, spell, or spell-like or supernatural ability. The effect in question must be a harmless effect on a failed saving throw. Unlike other gambits, this one can be attempted as an immediate action instead of a swift action."
Why would it be a failed saving throw? Shouldn't it be on a successful saving throw? What enemy would use a ability that does nothing to you on a failed saving throw? What kind ability even does that?