06-97 Siege of Serpents GM Discussion [SPOILERS]


GM Discussion

Liberty's Edge 5/5

PaizoCon is a few days away. This is going to be my first time running one of these big multi-table specials, so I'm excited, but also a little scared....

The first section ("A New Arrival", page 6-7 of the draft that was put online Friday, which is last I checked still the most current version)... OK, that was too long of a parenthetical comment. Let me start over. The first section says a new Pathfinder arrives to serve as a mouthpiece. There are three possibilities given, but it also suggests "A GM can also provide her own NPC."

I'm seriously tempted to bring in one of my PFS PCs as the NPC in question.... Too cheesy? I suppose I could just do it, and nobody would know, as it is just an NPC I created. (It would be the PC that would also get the GM credit for running this scenario. Makes me feel all verisimiltudinous or something.)

Grand Lodge 4/5 Global Organized Play Coordinator

2 people marked this as a favorite.

If you can breathe more life into your own PC, and provide the table a memorable experience, go for it!

Sovereign Court 4/5 5/5 ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
rknop wrote:
(It would be the PC that would also get the GM credit for running this scenario. Makes me feel all verisimiltudinous or something.)

I do this every time I run a special with an intro NPC.

* Contributor, RPG Superstar 2010 Top 4

By all means, the three I offered were either my PCs or those from my home games. Though Nigel is a bloke.

Grand Lodge 4/5

I asked Thursty and Mike about doing that with Siege of the Diamond City, and got a resounding yes. I see this and any other special as no different. I even do it with regular scenarios.

Now I just need to get my hands on this and see who is most suitable. I'm thinking Kane Elish, scion of efreeti or perhaps Professor Trey Hurtubize. :)

5/5 ***

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Rulebook Subscriber

I've posted a couple of times with no responses, but where is the map for the Floating Tower (G)? I leave tomorrow and had hoped to have the maps printed up.

Liberty's Edge 4/5 *

I also thought I would use my PC as the one who tells the party to get started, instead of the cowering noble. That character doesn't seem otherwise important, and it feels more natural to me to return to the PC that they spoke to earlier (especially since he is a VC in game anyway).

Silver Crusade 2/5 5/55/55/5 **

Tony Lindman wrote:
I also thought I would use my PC as the one who tells the party to get started, instead of the cowering noble. That character doesn't seem otherwise important, and it feels more natural to me to return to the PC that they spoke to earlier (especially since he is a VC in game anyway).

I like that idea, I was considering the same for the walk-in NPC but replacing the cowering noble with his manservant is an excellent idea.

* Contributor, RPG Superstar 2010 Top 4

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Sir Croome? From Seeker of Secrets? He's no coward. I think he's British. Well, the Golarion equivalent, Taldane.

There are a lot of cameo's and special mentions throughout the scenario.

Seriously, if you read it again if he didn't duck behind the barricade, he'd take a crossbow bolt in the head. Then he runs off to fight an elephant by himself.

Aint that tuff enuff? Fabulous Thunderbirds? Bueller?

I thought that was pretty badass for a guy with a monocle. Elephants are CR 7.

That said, there's no harm in swapping him out. I'm not offended on Sir Laribold's behalf. There's just a lot of NPCs that have small roles or are just mentioned by name. This is to reflect how much of the Society is present for this special occasion. Its likely not all players will catch the references, but they're kind of like "legal Easter eggs."

4/5

Jim, yeah, I think I'll play up the incoming fire and have him help the PPCs get to cover before talking to them.

And it was taking on the elephant with a swordcane that really badass. Or insanely foolish--I haven't decided which. :-)

Silver Crusade 2/5 5/55/55/5 **

I was unfamiliar with the NPC's history and/or significance since Seekers of Secrets was before I started with PFS. I'll definitely read up some more on him and see what I can do. I thought he was just a random NPC.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

Jim Groves wrote:
Seriously, if you read it again if he didn't duck behind the barricade, he'd take a crossbow bolt in the head. Then he runs off to fight an elephant by himself.

After giving the elephant a formal duelling salute, no less.

-Rob

Liberty's Edge 4/5 *

rknop wrote:
Jim Groves wrote:
Seriously, if you read it again if he didn't duck behind the barricade, he'd take a crossbow bolt in the head. Then he runs off to fight an elephant by himself.

After giving the elephant a formal duelling salute, no less.

-Rob

I was clearly reading too fast on my first pass. My apologies to the great man. I tip my lance in respect! :)

Lantern Lodge 1/5

Starting to read through this to prep for GenCon.

I don't understand the scoring system in Parts 2 and 3. In the one section it says that the hit points for a sector should be 4x the total number of tables. But there are only 2 encounters in that area for a single table to complete, which would be a total of 2 HP. So, the most that the whole room could do in damage to that sector would be half of the total?

Am I reading this wrong? I know it doesn't matter too much, as this is something the Overseer/HQ people will handle. Just trying to understand how this is supposed to work.

EDIT: It does affect things like the Aid Tokens, as the way I read it, it seems like the regions would never go to green, and thus players will never get that benefit.

Otherwise...I really like this scenario! Looks like it's going to be fun, and will be fun to GM too!

Grand Lodge 4/5

Keep in mind there are two encounters that can happen anywhere to run should the PCs complete all the encounters in a specific zone. But I did have a bit of trouble in that my table burned through the individual zone encounters, then the general encounters, much quicker than I expected.

Lantern Lodge 1/5

In part 3, however, the instructions say that each sector has HP equal to 2x the number of tables, but there's only 1 encounter in each zone. There aren't the 'additional encounters' like there are in Part 2. Just seemed odd to me.

I can understand the issue of moving through it too quickly though. If you have a party that's played these specials enough before, and understand the time-crunch aspect of it, could blow through them without too much struggle. I'm trying to think ahead about pacing and how to be sure we don't blast through them too much.

Grand Lodge 4/5

I assume the extra points are to give all tables a chance to run each encounter in Skyreach. As each one is important to the story, to have fast tables complete the act before the rest of the house can experience everything would be less than optimal. I know that earlier specials suffered from tables only getting through half of the set pieces that explained what was going on before the house had to move to the next act.

Lantern Lodge 1/5

Definitely agree. You can tell that the final encounter is set up to be much quicker, and that not everyone will complete all 3 waves (HP is only 1.25 x the number of tables). Just seemed odd for the earlier levels that I'm not really sure how you would get them into the green zone (as far as the aid tokens go), let alone complete clear them. At least in Part 3. In part 2, as you noted, the 2 extra encounters could help a bit.

Reading this whole adventure has got me very curious to see the story for 7-00 now as well. :D

Shadow Lodge 4/5 *

Seige of serpents ends with a definitive fight, unlike Stonelords and Diamond City that let players wait for the rest of the house by continuing waves of fights if they end early. What are we supposed to do if our table ends early after all the listed waves? Did this happen at paizocon, or is it incredibly unlikely due to the amount of content for the final act?

I'm considering prepping a particular NPC from earlier in the scenario (with a monocle) show up and "debrief" them by having the pc's tell him about their exploits if I end earlier that the house.

Grand Lodge 4/5

Sounds like a good idea, but I never made it to the final wave. We barely started the second.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 *

Another few questions, looking at my notes from beginning prep tonight:

1) Can the players use aid tokens retroactively after a result is revealed? Is it an immediate action? Can the healing one be used to prevent someone from dying immediately during damage resolution? Or does a PC need to use (call for) the aid as a standard action? If unspecified, I'm easy-going enough to rule in the pc's favor on this one. (Except immediately starting inspire courage after you roll and miss by one seems total cheese)

2) Pards: phasing attack text states a -4 to hit them with attacks of opportunity. Is this pointing out their mobility, or does it stack with mobility? (Giving them a 28 AC against aoo). Seems high at tier 3-4, but the map is tiny so they will not be able to benefit much from that crazy 120 ft. movement, so balances.

3) Who is Janis ivulxtin? Don't remember that VO from previous content, want to read up so I know how to present the NPC. Where does he appear?

Sovereign Court 5/5 *

Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Michael Tracey wrote:

Did this happen at paizocon, or is it incredibly unlikely due to the amount of content for the final act?

My table was running very quickly (only didn't finish 2 encounters in the first massive part). We had to wait a bit to start the final part, before though house caught up, but not very long. Just a quick bathroom break. In the final part we were one creature away from finishing the last wave. This was 3-4 sub-tier. This seemed abnormal. Most of the people I talked to didn't even find out there were Protean in the circle at the end.

(The Pard's were one of the only encounters they missed, otherwise I would comment on them too).

Grand Lodge 4/5 5/55/5

I have a question:

In part 2 each area has 4 times the number of tables worth of hit points and yet there are only two different options for each area, only one for the NE Campus, plus only two flexible options.

With this in mind, how is there supposed to be many areas that are green?

Shadow Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, Michigan—Mt. Pleasant

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I've been going over this prepping for a con next weekend that I'm overseer GMing. Like others have posted, why the big HPs for the acts? It is literally impossible to get any of the districts in Act 3 green and unlikely that many will get green in Act 2. Wouldn't it make more sense to make the HP's the Number of Tables for Act 3? For the Waves in Act 4 it would make more sense to have it 2x tables since that would allow all the tables an average of 2 waves.

I'll give my own con as an example.

We've got 5 tables scheduled. Meaning each of three districts has 20 hp.
There are 7 encounters possible between the 3 districts. Meaning if all tables do all 7 encounters they'll only do 35 hp's of damage to the districts. That's not even clearing 2 districts let alone all 3 for an early transition. Why even have that in the scenario since it's impossible to do?

Act 3 has 10 hps, but as stated earlier only 5 damage is possible. While Act 4 will have 6-7 hps with a possibility of 15 damage. That's just messed up math!

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—San Francisco Bay Area North & East

There's a continuity issue between Siege of Serpents and Serpents Rise that I want to point out, regarding Aram Zey. {Super-spoilers for both scenarios, obviously}

So, in this, Aram is found in the tapestry room. In Serpent's Rise, he's found in the Sky Key room. This is reconciled by an easily missed line, that some of the monsters from the tapestry dragged him back from the Sky Key room and put him here. In your descriptions of the room, it will cut down on a lot of confusion the next day when people play through Serpents Rise if you harp on the point that he was dragged in here. Maybe ask for a survival check when they're in the hallway before opening the door to see the blood smear.

To that end I made some art of this very important scene. Here are two versions of the room. The first is lit per the map, with some extra glow from the floor circle and tapestry. But since the scenario describes it as unlit, there's another with just light from the doorway (No matter what I do, I can't get the bloodstains correct on the unlit room).

Fully Lit
Lit from Hallway

Render object credits:
Rendered in Daz3d with Iray.

Forest backdrop: Colourize-Stock's stock 147. http://colourize-stock.deviantart.com/art/Landscape-Stock-147-323676328
Blood smears: http://gtaforums.com/topic/415200-gta-sa-3-blood-pack/ and http://mediamilitia.com/assorted-strokes-109-free-images/
Floor, sidewalls, ceiling: Inlite hallway http://inlitestudio.com/3d/product-tag/hall/
Far wall: Columna Wall by teknology3d https://www.renderosity.com/mod/freestuff/?item_id=55571 with texture from side walls
Near wall & Doors: http://www.joes3dfantasyworlds.com/down/arch01/arch01.htm 46th item.
Floor seal: Olympus Props Base http://www.sharecg.com/v/27935/gallery/11/Poser/OP-Base-III with texture from Nobiax's free set. http://www.daz3d.com/forums/discussion/comment/880815/#Comment_880815
Table & Chairs: House of Mog Ruith http://www.daz3d.com/house-of-mog-ruith-interior
Tapestry (love this one): 2 copies of Brick In The Wall https://www.daz3d.com/brick-in-the-wall with 3 textures (fiber, jute, and upholstery) from Nobiax's set above. One is flipped over so that there are bricks at top and bottom. The top pole is from https://www.daz3d.com/war-banners
torches: Dwell by Jack Tomalin (Daz Platinum Club free item). Fixture with the Brass texture from Tom2099 http://www.sharecg.com/v/81214/browse/21/DAZ-Studio/DAZ-Iray-car-related-sh ader-presets-megapack - light from Real lights for Daz http://www.daz3d.com/real-lights-for-daz-studio-iray
Columns: Columns of the Nile (Daz Platinum Club free item) with texture from the far wall item.

The Body
hair: http://www.daz3d.com/pure-hair-cool (for the widow's peak) and MD Mermaid Hair http://studiomaya3d.com/mayadoll.html for the rest with http://www.daz3d.com/uht-hair-shaders-for-iray
pants & boots: http://www.daz3d.com/voyager-m6 with http://www.daz3d.com/leather-and-fur-iray-shaders
shirt: http://www.daz3d.com/shieldmaiden-for-genesis-females with same shaders
beard: http://laticis.deviantart.com/art/Laticis-Imagery-FREE-Genesis-2-Male-Beard -512280041
Pose: modified from Eagle in http://www.sharecg.com/v/76523/browse/21/DAZ-Studio/Ghastlys-Vacuumite-Syst em-Genesis-1

Dataphiles 3/5

When prepping my maps for this scenario I noticed a possible problem...I don't see anything that is specifically a door to area C1h in the Mausoleum in Act 2. The best I could come up with is there looks like its "possible" there are open entries to C1h and C1f from C1a on the far right and left sides its C1a's upper edge. That would kind of make sense that there would be easy access to the main room of the Mausoleum and the Library. Am I missing something here or does that seem like a reasonable approach?

Shadow Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, Michigan—Mt. Pleasant

You can see there's a covered entrance leading from the upper unlabled room. It looks like a layer mistake when the map was made.

Dataphiles 3/5

I thought that might be it at first, but it didnt make sense to put the only door to the main room of the building in the back room.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, Michigan—Mt. Pleasant

It did when the map was used for the final encounters of the Year of the Shadow Lodge special...

Silver Crusade 4/5

So maybe I'm just blind, but I'm not seeing where to buy and download this. The event where I'll be GMing it is more than a month away, but I like having lots of prep time.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, Michigan—Mt. Pleasant

You can't buy the specials until they've been out a year. The only way to get them sooner is to run them at a con and you only get those when they add them to your downloads. So you're stuck until it gets added, sorry Fromper.

Silver Crusade 4/5

I thought it might be something like that. I'll talk to the organizer when I see him at our local game day this Sunday. Thanks for the info.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, Michigan—Mt. Pleasant

Since Mike left John is pulling double duty. He's the one that puts the scenarios in your downloads, and I believe last I saw he finished last half of Sept. conventions. So if you're running in October you'll have to wait until John starts doing early October conventions, or borrow a hardcopy from someone who has run it already.

Dark Archive 2/5 **

Eric Clingenpeel wrote:

I've been going over this prepping for a con next weekend that I'm overseer GMing. Like others have posted, why the big HPs for the acts? It is literally impossible to get any of the districts in Act 3 green and unlikely that many will get green in Act 2. Wouldn't it make more sense to make the HP's the Number of Tables for Act 3? For the Waves in Act 4 it would make more sense to have it 2x tables since that would allow all the tables an average of 2 waves.

I'll give my own con as an example.

We've got 5 tables scheduled. Meaning each of three districts has 20 hp.
There are 7 encounters possible between the 3 districts. Meaning if all tables do all 7 encounters they'll only do 35 hp's of damage to the districts. That's not even clearing 2 districts let alone all 3 for an early transition. Why even have that in the scenario since it's impossible to do?

Act 3 has 10 hps, but as stated earlier only 5 damage is possible. While Act 4 will have 6-7 hps with a possibility of 15 damage. That's just messed up math!

I would also really appreciate a clarification on this issue.

Silver Crusade 4/5

MagFire wrote:
Eric Clingenpeel wrote:

I've been going over this prepping for a con next weekend that I'm overseer GMing. Like others have posted, why the big HPs for the acts? It is literally impossible to get any of the districts in Act 3 green and unlikely that many will get green in Act 2. Wouldn't it make more sense to make the HP's the Number of Tables for Act 3? For the Waves in Act 4 it would make more sense to have it 2x tables since that would allow all the tables an average of 2 waves.

I'll give my own con as an example.

We've got 5 tables scheduled. Meaning each of three districts has 20 hp.
There are 7 encounters possible between the 3 districts. Meaning if all tables do all 7 encounters they'll only do 35 hp's of damage to the districts. That's not even clearing 2 districts let alone all 3 for an early transition. Why even have that in the scenario since it's impossible to do?

Act 3 has 10 hps, but as stated earlier only 5 damage is possible. While Act 4 will have 6-7 hps with a possibility of 15 damage. That's just messed up math!

I would also really appreciate a clarification on this issue.

Yup, me too. Currently prepping to run this soon, and wondering the same thing. It's literally not possible to clear all the sections in part 2, and only some will be green, even if every table finishes every encounter successfully. The math is obviously broken.

I haven't gotten to reading the later sections yet.

4/5 5/5 * Contributor

Steven Schopmeyer wrote:
Sounds like a good idea, but I never made it to the final wave. We barely started the second.

Oh, and what a rhomp it was! My bloodrager was there, and so was Ryan's half-naked brawler, and that oracle who kept making you reroll a bazillion dice.

Good times. Good times.

Dark Archive 5/5 *

Is there a way to get the supplement for this. Rest of all the stat blocks.
??????????????

Dark Archive 4/5 5/55/5 ****

joe kirner wrote:

Is there a way to get the supplement for this. Rest of all the stat blocks.

??????????????

Try downloading again from your My Downloads. I was provided with the scenario recently for the PbP Gameday and the .zip includes both the scenario and the supplement.

1/5

Pathfinder PF Special Edition Subscriber

Is there a place to report issues with the scenario?

p. 14, I'm pretty sure the large number of CR 1/3 creatures (for tier 1–2) shouldn't have 37 hp each.

Creature:

Fire beetle

But I *am* having fun imagining the table conversations. PLAYER: "What do you mean TPK in the first encounter?!" GM:"I'm required to run the scenario as written."

Dark Archive 5/5 *

Its a typo. They have 4.

1/5

Pathfinder PF Special Edition Subscriber

I figured that much out. It seems an easy enough fix I'm surprised they haven't corrected it. 4 and 37 are very different numbers.

Dark Archive 5/5 *

Too many scenarios.
Too many typos and other various errors.
They will not be corrected.
Use your gm creative solutions to fix them.
Also the gm discussion threads are very helpful.

1/5

Pathfinder PF Special Edition Subscriber

Geesh, this one is full of little errors.

One more example: Encounter C1 has the compass rose pointing "down" on the map... about 1/3 of the descriptions for this part respect this. The other 2/3 assume north is up instead of down.

Like the other errors I've seen in this scenario, it's pretty easy to correct once it's noticed, but it's off-putting the first read-through.

Sovereign Court 4/5

I hadn't noticed the compass rose bit, but I had noticed the inconsistent terminology. I suppose knowing there's an explanation makes it somewhat better.

I expect the below to become part of a review once I've completed running the scenario, but I think its worth saying in the meantime:

I know it's been said many times above, but the HP for the different acts really doesn't make sense at all (Act 2 has 7 encounters, but complete success would require each table to succeed in 12 encounters, Act 3 has only 3 encounters versus 6 HP/table, and then Act 4 seems to dramatically overcorrect and wrap things up before most tables have even started the final encounter.)

I'm currently running this as part of the PBP Gameday at the 1-2 tier, so it's not the typical experience, but I expect to run it in person in early 2016. We're about to wrap up Act 2, which is very good because I'm just about to run out of encounters for that act. I am concerned they'll run through act 3 and be stuck waiting for the other tables.

I do hope future specials make sure that there's no chance for a party to just have to sit around and wait for others to catch up, especially at the low tier where combats can be quick. At the very least, throwing in several more floating encounters would be nice in the future. As a player, part of what's made these specials so fun is the feeling that there's too much for any one team to do, but I'm not really getting that from this scenario.

Sovereign Court 4/5 5/5 ** Venture-Lieutenant, Netherlands—Leiden

I was wondering about this myself when prepping to run it. I believe the idea is that it's supposed to be hard for the house to get maximal success, that you're not supposed to get to all the encounters anyway before you run out of time.

In our playthrough, the players didn't manage to fully secure the grounds before we had to shove them into the tower, even though we had 6 hour timeslot.

Sovereign Court 4/5

The point I'm trying to make is that hard is good, but mathematically impossible is not. For example, Act 3 is supposed to end after 70 minutes or when all three districts are reduced to 0. Using the numbers given, there is no possible way to reduce any district to 0, never mind all of them.

Getting a district to 0 in act 2 would require every table to run both floating encounters in the same district, and even then it couldn't be the Northeast.

I'd like there to be enough encounters that you won't get through all of them, but at the low tier I'm not sure that's the case.

Anyway, my advice for people running the low tier would be to save encounter A1 for last in part 2, as it's the easiest one to stretch out if necessary.

Community / Forums / Organized Play / GM Discussion / 06-97 Siege of Serpents GM Discussion [SPOILERS] All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in GM Discussion