Still Spell Metamagic Rod


Pathfinder First Edition General Discussion

Scarab Sages

Is it possible to buy a rod of Still Spell?

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2011 Top 32

Why would you want it? Having to have the rod in hand and wave it around as part of casting the spell sort of defeats the purpose of Still Spell.


As ryric says, the purpose of the rod is defeated by the necessity of retrieving/holding it. Unless maybe you suspect that you'll be subjected to a grapple or something, and start the encounter with it just in case.

Something like earrings of still spell would be more useful though, if you can talk your DM into it.

Scarab Sages

If possible, I was thinking of wearing Full Plate and a Tower Shield and pay 3000gp to cast 3 spells without a somatic component. Also, while reading about rods, it said that you simply need to have it in your possession and will the use of it while casting a spell, not the same thing as a wand.

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2011 Top 32

Tequila, oddly enough having no somatic components doesn't make casting in a grapple any easier in Pathfinder.

PRD wrote:


Unless noted otherwise, you must be holding a rod to use its abilities.

If your plan is to cast arcane spells in full plate with a tower shield, you might as well just take the feat Still Spell and cast more than 3/day.

Basically the reason the rods don't exist is that for most concepts they are self-defeating. Were I your GM and you wanted a custom rod I might raise an eyebrow but I don't think it's broken.

Scarab Sages

What does PRD stand for? I really want to see this cause I have looked for this...


Pathfinder Reference Documen-It has the official rules for the game there online.

There is no metamagic still rod. Here is a link to the rods.

Grand Lodge

It would be the same prices as the equivalent rods of silent metamagic.

Shadow Lodge

While it doesn't exist, it would be cool for a still spell rod that could be brought to the wielder's hand as per a metamagiced mage hand still spell (that would affect only the rod, despite it being a magic item).

Scarab Sages

I was thinking about an Eldritch Knight that only casts spells to power/buff himself. He wouldn't need that many uses a day and would have the money when the time comes. Use rod, drop and pull out weapon. So far, metamagic traits are an option for level 1-2 spells. When level 3 spells come into play and magical knack is one of your traits, arcane armor training and mastery would replace the need for the feat, and mithral full plate would only have 1/20 chance to stop spellcasting.

It's doable, I guess, but the rod would make it so much easier...

Scarab Sages

Avatar-1 wrote:
While it doesn't exist, it would be cool for a still spell rod that could be brought to the wielder's hand as per a metamagiced mage hand still spell (that would affect only the rod, despite it being a magic item).

There is a spell that put's your wand in your weapon. Level 1. So it wouldn't be much of a bother if you have the time.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / General Discussion / Still Spell Metamagic Rod All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.