| Stephen Radney-MacFarland Designer |
While (aggravatingly) the text of both the run action and the Run feat do not say, you lose your Dex bonus until the start of your next turn.
Typically when you do things for a full round it means that you are doing it between the span of time between one initiative count to the same initiative count in the next round (Core Rulebook 178). This is definitely the case for running, since it has rules that explain what happen if you do it for multiple consecutive rounds.
In other words, you are running for the full round, though you apply the movement on your turn for simplicity. Since you are running for the full round, you take the penalty for the full round.
I hope that helps.
| Carnox |
Typically when you do things for a full round it means that you are doing it between the span of time between one initiative count to the same initiative count in the next round (Core Rulebook 178). This is definitely the case for running, since it has rules that explain what happen if you do it for multiple consecutive rounds.
I think there maybe a relevant distinction between things that take a full round and a full-round action.
When the rules refer to a "full round", they usually mean a span of time from a particular initiative count in one round to the same initiative count in the next round. Effects that last a certain number of rounds end just before the same initiative count that they began on.
| Stephen Radney-MacFarland Designer |
Stephen Radney-MacFarland wrote:Typically when you do things for a full round it means that you are doing it between the span of time between one initiative count to the same initiative count in the next round (Core Rulebook 178). This is definitely the case for running, since it has rules that explain what happen if you do it for multiple consecutive rounds.I think there maybe a relevant distinction between things that take a full round and a full-round action.
pfsrd wrote:When the rules refer to a "full round", they usually mean a span of time from a particular initiative count in one round to the same initiative count in the next round. Effects that last a certain number of rounds end just before the same initiative count that they began on.
At times, maybe, just not in this case.
| Stephen Radney-MacFarland Designer |
Seeing some people interpretation, it is worth an errata, don't you think?
That's not really the criteria we use when deciding what is errata or what is FAQ. If it was, we would be chasing all sorts of rabbits down all sorts of holes.
That being said, I'm all for clarifying the text here a bit, but we have a process that involves the whole design team, and I'm sure it will come up.