The US Government rolled a 1.


Off-Topic Discussions

1 to 50 of 132 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Shadow Lodge

So who had to stay home from work today?

Liberty's Edge

But the President, congress, house, supreme court are still getting paid so its all good.

I wonder how many times the President will go golfing during the shutdown.

Sovereign Court

Bummer. For people not working. I assume they are not getting paid for the days they won't be working.


Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
CapeCodRPGer wrote:
But the President, congress, house, supreme court are still getting paid so its all good.

Leaving aside that it's redundant to list the House after mentioning Congress...

Congress has no choice in the matter, thanks to the 27th Amendment. Likewise, the President's (and, I suspect, the Supreme Court's) salaries are determined to be "essential spending" - a determination that is not, I believe, made by the President or the Court.

Hama wrote:
Bummer. For people not working. I assume they are not getting paid for the days they won't be working.

In the previous shutdown, furloughed workers were, in fact, paid for the days they weren't able to work, though it was retroactive after the shutdown ended.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

No, the folks are sent home and don´t get any money for that time. Gotta pay some bills? Too bad, thats what you get for working for the gov´t - that what some right-wing nuts would say, I guess.

Oh, and: its not the Government that rolled a 1 - its the politicians, who did not want to find a solution to this problem and try to blackmail everybody else into giving in to their position. The words I find for that kind of political maneuver are not fit for a public messageboard.

The Exchange

So do you think there is anyone there who reads the President's Emails...I kinda emailed him a suggestion that they do a lottery where NASA gets a Trillion dollars funding.

Shadow Lodge

I am a contractor at a government lab. We are still open, however, it is uncertain whether or not we will be during the duration of the shutdown - it depends on how long it is shut down. I still get paid even if I am told not to come to work (one of the few perks of being a contractor vs. government employee). I have been told that I am to work at home but I am not allowed to use my personal computer (security reasons) even though 99% of my work involves a computer. Brilliant.


Link for those of us not in the know?


Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Stebehil wrote:
No, the folks are sent home and don´t get any money for that time. Gotta pay some bills? Too bad, thats what you get for working for the gov´t - that what some right-wing nuts would say, I guess.

Strictly speaking, there's no automatic mechanism to retroactively pay furloughed workers - it's just that Congress has always done so after previous shutdowns ended. That said, it's believable that this Congress might not (though the fact that they unanimously approved a bill to keep paying active troops is a silver lining).

Shadow Lodge

Orthos wrote:
Link for those of us not in the know?

link


So this is what my army buddy was going on about last night. This does not bode well for him getting his paperwork all in order for coming back stateside. =(


Orthos wrote:
So this is what my army buddy was going on about last night. This does not bode well for him getting his paperwork all in order for coming back stateside. =(

Yes, from what I´ve read, it might be that paperwork of that kind might be delayed until the government can work again. Talk about taking the people hostage.


My sister was working 2 jobs, and lost both of them yesterday, due to this.


Kryzbyn wrote:
My sister was working 2 jobs, and lost both of them yesterday, due to this.

Curious how that worked out considering the shutdown did not happen till today( at midnight last night).


She had a job at a security firm hired by the gov't to guard a national guard hangar. They were informed yesterday their contract was ended due to the impending shutdown.
She also works as a nurse at a VA retirement home. They were informed they would receive no pay past midnight.
She called me yesterday around 4 pm CST.

Grand Lodge

Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Asphere wrote:
I am a contractor at a government lab. We are still open, however, it is uncertain whether or not we will be during the duration of the shutdown - it depends on how long it is shut down. I still get paid even if I am told not to come to work (one of the few perks of being a contractor vs. government employee). I have been told that I am to work at home but I am not allowed to use my personal computer (security reasons) even though 99% of my work involves a computer. Brilliant.

I'm also a contractor in a government lab and I'm at work today. They told us yesterday to keep right on coming in because we still have FY13 money that we can tap.

However, I don't know what kind of contracting deal you have, but I know that if we do get sent home, there is no pay or working from home for me. In fact, I work with a lot of contractors from a lot of different companies (large and small) and I don't know any of them that get paid for not working. The government employees have always gotten back pay for shutdowns; contractors, not so much. (Your contract must be set up differently than the ones I'm used to dealing with.)

-Skeld

Grand Lodge

I dont know about contractors but our GS employees had a mass briefing this morning and it doesnt sound like it went well. When I came in I found out POTUS signed HR 3210, keeping our (military) pay intact. However, even without pay we'd still be here.

RPG Superstar 2013 Top 16

I'm helping run a 16-hour environmental test today. Wish the EPA were shut down...


Kryzbyn wrote:

She had a job at a security firm hired by the gov't to guard a national guard hangar. They were informed yesterday their contract was ended due to the impending shutdown.

She also works as a nurse at a VA retirement home. They were informed they would receive no pay past midnight.
She called me yesterday around 4 pm CST.

Well then she's still employed as a VA nurse, albeit with no pay. Silver linings man!


I was wondering when this thread would pop up...

Yes, it is a fiasco. But if they can't get it together, the real pain comes in two weeks when we hit the debt ceiling.

Liberty's Edge

Or maybe just pass the continuing resolution...

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Hrm, this happened at a state level a year or two back where I live. If memory serves, a large beer company realized it had some kind of clerical error involved in some kind of licensing such that they couldn't sell beer in the state until they got it fixed, which couldn't happen during the shutdown. A new budget was approved and the government working again within 24 hours.

I'm sure there's some kind of takeaway there that could be applied on the federal level, right?


I only just noticed this when I tried to follow a link to the US Copyright Office and ended up at http://www.copyright.gov/eco/notice_special.html

Guess I need to tear myself away from coding and writing and actually go watch the news, or something...


Stebehil wrote:

No, the folks are sent home and don´t get any money for that time. Gotta pay some bills? Too bad, thats what you get for working for the gov´t - that what some right-wing nuts would say, I guess.

And what the left-wing nuts would say as well.


RainyDayNinja wrote:
I'm helping run a 16-hour environmental test today. Wish the EPA were shut down...

I read that some Superfund stuff is closing down. We work-studiers are still getting paid AFAIK, for now.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
RainyDayNinja wrote:
I'm helping run a 16-hour environmental test today. Wish the EPA were shut down...

Annoying as it is, its better than the rivers being back on fire.

RPG Superstar 2013 Top 16

1 person marked this as a favorite.

What do I care about rivers? I get seasick, and I hate the taste of fish. I say good riddance!

Shadow Lodge

Skeld wrote:
Asphere wrote:
I am a contractor at a government lab. We are still open, however, it is uncertain whether or not we will be during the duration of the shutdown - it depends on how long it is shut down. I still get paid even if I am told not to come to work (one of the few perks of being a contractor vs. government employee). I have been told that I am to work at home but I am not allowed to use my personal computer (security reasons) even though 99% of my work involves a computer. Brilliant.

I'm also a contractor in a government lab and I'm at work today. They told us yesterday to keep right on coming in because we still have FY13 money that we can tap.

However, I don't know what kind of contracting deal you have, but I know that if we do get sent home, there is no pay or working from home for me. In fact, I work with a lot of contractors from a lot of different companies (large and small) and I don't know any of them that get paid for not working. The government employees have always gotten back pay for shutdowns; contractors, not so much. (Your contract must be set up differently than the ones I'm used to dealing with.)

-Skeld

Yes I guess it depends on what kind of contractor you are. I am a postdoctoral researcher so things are definitely different for me.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

I do think this is necessary.

I hope this means lessening the republicans ability to force the democrats into the Golden mean fallacy.

How this works.

The democrats want to spend 100,000 dollars on a new plane and 300,000 on welfare

The republicans want to spend 300,000 on a new plane and 100,000 on welfare.

Normally this would result in 200,000 being spent on each (or 300,000 being spent on each) just to get a budget through as the legislators compromise with each other.

But what the republicans in the house do is stop any bill from coming to a vote unless a majority OF REPUBLICANS want it, and then present that as the compromise bill. So the republicans starting bid becomes

500,000 for the airplane, 0 for the poor, and we'll grind the poor into dog food.

So far the democrats have been falling for it, winding up with 400,000 for the airplane, 50,000 for the poor, and only HALF of them ground up into dog food. The right has been giving far too much legitimacy to their crazy because it works. We need to stop rewarding being the bigger twit.


I work for one of the Social Security Disability claim processing offices. I'm a state employee paid through federal funds. I'm still at work, though we have limitations regarding what claims we are allowed to process.

-Aaron

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Justin Rocket wrote:
Stebehil wrote:

No, the folks are sent home and don´t get any money for that time. Gotta pay some bills? Too bad, thats what you get for working for the gov´t - that what some right-wing nuts would say, I guess.

And what the left-wing nuts would say as well.

I am not sure I follow this whole "both parties are to blame" rhetoric. The PPACA was enacted by congress after much compromise from both parties. The current spending bill has nothing to do with the PPACA other than the fact that some conservatives have used it as a hostage to defund the PPACA.


A fellow grad student left on a plane from New Zealand to visit collections at the Smithsonian for 3 weeks before the big vert paleo conferences. The Smithsonian has one of the best collections of marine mammal material in the world, and is crucial for his dissertation research.

Smithsonian is shut down now, and so he is going to be left to try to rearrange his trip and find suitable material elsewhere.


8 people marked this as a favorite.

Don't the politicians know that they are risking that people actually notice they don't need the government that much?

Shadow Lodge

MMCJawa wrote:

A fellow grad student left on a plane from New Zealand to visit collections at the Smithsonian for 3 weeks before the big vert paleo conferences. The Smithsonian has one of the best collections of marine mammal material in the world, and is crucial for his dissertation research.

Smithsonian is shut down now, and so he is going to be left to try to rearrange his trip and find suitable material elsewhere.

Damn that sucks.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Drejk wrote:
Don't the politicians know that they are risking that people actually notice they don't need the government that much?

This might be true for a few days weeks or even months, but wait til Jan 1. And remember that while our servicemen work for no pay, our congress is paid for no work.

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

...maybe they're Taking 20...


4 people marked this as a favorite.
lucky7 wrote:
...maybe they're Taking 20...

No, dealing with the tea party always counts as being threatened.


Drejk wrote:
Don't the politicians know that they are risking that people actually notice they don't need the government that much?

I hope that people some day notice that they don´t need these politicians all that much.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
BigNorseWolf wrote:
lucky7 wrote:
...maybe they're Taking 20...
No, dealing with the tea party always counts as being threatened.

Remember, a spell ready to go counts as being armed. I guess this is either Evards Blackmail or Touch of Idiocy.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Asphere wrote:
Justin Rocket wrote:
Stebehil wrote:

No, the folks are sent home and don´t get any money for that time. Gotta pay some bills? Too bad, thats what you get for working for the gov´t - that what some right-wing nuts would say, I guess.

And what the left-wing nuts would say as well.

I am not sure I follow this whole "both parties are to blame" rhetoric. The PPACA was enacted by congress after much compromise from both parties. The current spending bill has nothing to do with the PPACA other than the fact that some conservatives have used it as a hostage to defund the PPACA.

Friday, 9/20/13 - The House of Representatives passed a Continuing Resolution that would fully fund the government (including things that Republicans don't like) while at the same time defunding Obamacare.

Result: House Republicans compromised on spending that we'd like to see cut in exchange for defunding Obamacare.

Friday, 9/27/13 - The Senate stripped the defunding language out of the House passed Continuing Resolution and sent it back to the House.
Result: Harry Reid and Senate Democrats refused to compromise.

Saturday, 9/28/13 - The House of Representatives added two amendments to the Senate revised Continuing Resolution to delay Obamacare for one year (far from what we were originally willing to agree to) and repeal the medical device tax.
Result: House Republicans compromised away from defunding to delaying Obamacare for one year.

Monday, 9/30/13 - The Senate stripped the two amendments from the House passed Continuing Resolution and sent it back to the House.
Result: Harry Reid and Senate Democrats refuse to compromise one inch on Obamacare.

It looks to me like the responsibility for the failure to reach a solution fell on both parties.


7 people marked this as a favorite.
Justin Rocket wrote:
It looks to me like the responsibility for the failure to reach a solution fell on both parties.

It only appears that way because of the fallacy I noted above.

Starting your bid by putting 5,000 kittens in a blender, and then moving it down to 2,000 kittens in a blender when the other person says no is not a compromise.

Obamacare is ALREADY a compromise between Single payer, public option, Obamacare, and the free for all system.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Justin Rocket wrote:
It looks to me like the responsibility for the failure to reach a solution fell on both parties.

With all due respect, it only looks that way if you aren't paying attention.

The Republican house tied funding the government to TOTALLY UNRELATED ACA demands. The blame for that lies squarely on them. For both parties to share the blame, the Democrats would have to be insisting on the repeal of the Bush tax cuts (or similar) before agreeing to fund the government.

One, and only one, party is choosing to hold funding the government hostage.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Speaking as a libertarian, I can't help but be thrilled about anything that wakes people up to the colossal failure that our federal government has become. The more we strip power from it and move that power to the states or to the people, the better off our country will be.
As a disabled person and a gay person, I'm particularly concerned about the disenfranchised in this country. I'm keenly aware of the discrimination and inequality which is pervasive in our country. However, I have ZERO confidence that those problems can be fixed or will be fixed by the federal government. I can point to multiple examples in history which show that attempts to fix those problems by government remotely located from the problem have failed.


bugleyman wrote:
Justin Rocket wrote:

Friday, 9/20/13 - The House of Representatives passed a Continuing Resolution that would fully fund the government (including things that Republicans don't like) while at the same time defunding Obamacare.

Result: House Republicans compromised on spending that we'd like to see cut in exchange for defunding Obamacare.

Friday, 9/27/13 - The Senate stripped the defunding language out of the House passed Continuing Resolution and sent it back to the House.
Result: Harry Reid and Senate Democrats refused to compromise.

Saturday, 9/28/13 - The House of Representatives added two amendments to the Senate revised Continuing Resolution to delay Obamacare for one year (far from what we were originally willing to agree to) and repeal the medical device tax.
Result: House Republicans compromised away from defunding to delaying Obamacare for one year.

Monday, 9/30/13 - The Senate stripped the two amendments from the House passed Continuing Resolution and sent it back to the House.
Result: Harry Reid and Senate Democrats refuse to compromise one inch on Obamacare.

It looks to me like the responsibility for the failure to reach a solution fell on both parties.

The Republican house tied funding the government to TOTALLY UNRELATED ACA demands. The blame for that lies squarely on them. If both parties were equally to blame, then the Democrats would be insisting on the repeal of the Bush tax cuts in order to fund the government.

ACA is a component of funding. It cannot be considered totally unrelated to funding.


Justin Rocket wrote:
ACA is a component of funding. It cannot be considered totally unrelated to funding.

EVERYTHING THE GOVERNMENT DOES is "related" to funding...see my remark above about the Bush tax cuts.

Extortion, plain and simple. Thankfully, it is almost guaranteed to backfire.

Dark Archive

Wow. I live in the Netherlands and this would never happen around here. never.

You have some crappy politicians, and I thought ours were bad.


bugleyman wrote:
EVERYTHING THE GOVERNMENT DOES is "related" to funding...see my remark above about the Bush tax cuts.
bugleyman wrote:
The Republican house tied funding the government to TOTALLY UNRELATED ACA demands.

These two statements are mutually contradictory

bugleyman wrote:


Maybe the Democrats should vote to de-fund big ag subsidies?

I'd be ecstatic if they did!


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Justin Rocket wrote:
bugleyman wrote:
EVERYTHING THE GOVERNMENT DOES is "related" to funding...see my remark above about the Bush tax cuts.
bugleyman wrote:
The Republican house tied funding the government to TOTALLY UNRELATED ACA demands.

These two statements are mutually contradictory

No, they aren't, because you omitted the implied "from that point of view" from the front of my incredulous response.

But whatever. If you truly believe both parties are equally to blame, nothing I say is going to open your eyes.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Justin Rocket wrote:
Asphere wrote:
Justin Rocket wrote:
Stebehil wrote:

No, the folks are sent home and don´t get any money for that time. Gotta pay some bills? Too bad, thats what you get for working for the gov´t - that what some right-wing nuts would say, I guess.

And what the left-wing nuts would say as well.

I am not sure I follow this whole "both parties are to blame" rhetoric. The PPACA was enacted by congress after much compromise from both parties. The current spending bill has nothing to do with the PPACA other than the fact that some conservatives have used it as a hostage to defund the PPACA.

Friday, 9/20/13 - The House of Representatives passed a Continuing Resolution that would fully fund the government (including things that Republicans don't like) while at the same time defunding Obamacare.

Result: House Republicans compromised on spending that we'd like to see cut in exchange for defunding Obamacare.

Friday, 9/27/13 - The Senate stripped the defunding language out of the House passed Continuing Resolution and sent it back to the House.
Result: Harry Reid and Senate Democrats refused to compromise.

Saturday, 9/28/13 - The House of Representatives added two amendments to the Senate revised Continuing Resolution to delay Obamacare for one year (far from what we were originally willing to agree to) and repeal the medical device tax.
Result: House Republicans compromised away from defunding to delaying Obamacare for one year.

Monday, 9/30/13 - The Senate stripped the two amendments from the House passed Continuing Resolution and sent it back to the House.
Result: Harry Reid and Senate Democrats refuse to compromise one inch on Obamacare.

It looks to me like the responsibility for the failure to reach a solution fell on both parties.

But the PPACA was already enacted by both chambers of congress 3 years ago after heavy compromise from the left. There is a legislative process to challenge established laws - the Republicans have failed 41 times (I think?) to repeal the PPACA via this process. The next step would be to win future elections and to continue to challenge it.

The PPACA was not part of the spending bill. The spending bill is being used as a last attempt to stop the PPACA through unprecedented strategy based on extortion.

1 to 50 of 132 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / The US Government rolled a 1. All Messageboards