Gender / Sex Politics in the Real World


Off-Topic Discussions

2,301 to 2,350 of 3,118 << first < prev | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | next > last >>
Sovereign Court

Kittyburger wrote:
Guy Humual wrote:
Shifty wrote:
Guy Humual wrote:
MMORPGs should be different in my opinion, I mean we're dealing with role players here, and I'd hope that game companies would be mature enough to see that we're not put off by female characters.
It's still gaming, and my experience of MMO's is that Roleplayers are very much in the minority and the rest are playing a MMOFPS ina fantasy wrapper. I came out of the ultra-hardcore raiding guilds and 'RP' was about the furthest thing from most peoples minds.

I did say "hope"

Shifty wrote:

Even the casuals in MMO's aren't all that into RP, it was a rarity - they had RP dedicated servers, but once again, that made up a really small fraction.

Cheesecake or not (and the guys are cheesecake just as often) its still women on all their covers leading the show. Firiona Vie to be precise, Elven nature deity and one of the biggest toughies in the game.

Guys tend to be Beefcake, like the dude on the second cover you linked, but male cheesecake could exist I suppose . . . I'm not sure I've ever seen it though.
Dave Willis talked about the different types of "unattainable beauty standards" in Shortpacked - this was in context of comics but I think it makes a lot of sense in terms of RPGs, too: http://www.shortpacked.com/2011/comic/book-13/05-the-death-of-snkrs/falseeq uivalence/

The link you posted just takes me to today's comic but I think this is the comic you're talking about Here. And yes I like Dave Willis.


I'm going to need a flow chart for the male cheesecake/beefcake female cheesecake/beefcake difference....


It didn’t always suck to be a woman in Afghanistan

As Comrade Jeff pointed out before everything went down the memory hole, the article mentions the Taliban and not the other factions of the woman-hating mujahedin.

Given more time to think about it, I also think those pix are just taken from Kabul and other metropolitan areas. I'm pretty sure life for rural women in Afghanistan has always sucked.

Article I found on the internet by an old comrade's mother

Vive le Galt!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:
Anti-Caste: On Caste, Women's Oppression, Communalism, and Class Struggle in South Asia from a Marxist Perspective

Those who saw the horrific news from India today will understand why I am bumping this.

Khap Panchayats


fine upstanding man...not wrote:
Sunil Soren, a tribal leader from a nearby village, insisted in a telephone interview that people in the area “respect our women a lot.” But he said that Mr. Sheikh and the young woman were “in an objectionable situation,” and that such incidents “pollute the minds of youngsters.”

I just don't even know where to begin when faced with a comment like that.


Well, I started with crying, and then moved on to rage.

[Beats dog]

Don't worry, it's okay, I'm a goblin.


I don't know what to tell you, Doodles. Sometimes the world is just an awful, awful place; even m'lord Dice was aghast, but sometimes it's too late to save anyone by the time it's hit the airwaves.


[Beats Dicey]

My dog thanks you, stooge.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:

It didn’t always suck to be a woman in Afghanistan

As Comrade Jeff pointed out before everything went down the memory hole, the article mentions the Taliban and not the other factions of the woman-hating mujahedin.

Given more time to think about it, I also think those pix are just taken from Kabul and other metropolitan areas. I'm pretty sure life for rural women in Afghanistan has always sucked.

Article I found on the internet by an old comrade's mother

Vive le Galt!

Much of the blame for what Afghanistan has become can be laid right here at our feet (though in fairness, Pakistan deserves an even greater share of the blame). The United States encouraged the growth of the Taliban because at the time, they were major PITA for Mother Russia. Since they were threathening the Soviet's oil bloodlines, we really didn't care that they were Fundamentalist bigoted fanatics.


You don't have to convince me.

My old comrades were pretty infamous on the eighties left for running around yelling,

Hail Red Army in Afghanistan!

Sovereign Court

Shifty wrote:
fine upstanding man...not wrote:
Sunil Soren, a tribal leader from a nearby village, insisted in a telephone interview that people in the area “respect our women a lot.” But he said that Mr. Sheikh and the young woman were “in an objectionable situation,” and that such incidents “pollute the minds of youngsters.”
I just don't even know where to begin when faced with a comment like that.

Hey in all fairness this is exactly the attitude the puritans brought to America and it's not like Americans today have any hangups about sex . . .


Usually I am happy to agree with any outlandish accusation against the United States that anyone cares to hurl, but, um, I don't remember councils of Puritan elders ordering gang rapes of women. Maybe they made them wear the letter "A" on their clothes, and I'm sure they weren't terribly gallant to the native women, but, still.


Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:
Usually I am happy to agree with any outlandish accusation against the United States that anyone cares to hurl, but, um, I don't remember councils of Puritan elders ordering gang rapes of women. Maybe they made them wear the letter "A" on their clothes, and I'm sure they weren't terribly gallant to the native women, but, still.

Well yeah, between that and setting them on fire of course...


Hey, we New Englanders only did that once!

Ye olde Englanders and German-types did that, like, once a month for three hundred years!


I wonder what happens when I try to cut and paste a graph?

Approximate statistics on the number of trials for witchcraft and executions in various regions of Europe in the period 1450–1750:[35]

Region

Number of trials

Number of executions

British Isles and North America

~5,000

~1,500–2,000

Holy Roman Empire (Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, Lorraine, Austria and Czech)

~50,000

~25,000–30,000

France

~3,000

~1,000

Scandinavia

~5,000

~1,700–2,000

Eastern Europe (Poland and Lithuania, Hungary and Russia)

~7,000

~2,000

Southern Europe (Spain, Portugal and Italy)

~10,000

~1,000

Total:

~80,000

~35,000

---

Hmm, well that sucks.


Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:
Hey, we New Englanders only did that once!

I stand corrected.

Sovereign Court

Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:
Usually I am happy to agree with any outlandish accusation against the United States that anyone cares to hurl, but, um, I don't remember councils of Puritan elders ordering gang rapes of women. Maybe they made them wear the letter "A" on their clothes, and I'm sure they weren't terribly gallant to the native women, but, still.

Well from what I remember the puritans were more into killing folks for sexual deviance, though I have no idea how often these laws were enforced, but seems to me that rape, sodomy, and adultery committed by married women were all crimes that called for the death sentence. Seems to me they also liked to tie women to the back of carts and whip them though the town. What is unhealthy about these societies is their controlling nature.


Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:
Usually I am happy to agree with any outlandish accusation against the United States that anyone cares to hurl,

I don't know what I was thinking.

Down with the US!

For women's liberation through socialist revolution!

---

I hate to keep sticking up for the US, Guy, and I'm going to go poke around about the Puritans (American and Britishiznoid), but I'd like to point out that while whatever they may have done 400 years ago is terrible, what happened in some (apparently nameless--isn't that weird? you'd think the NY Times would at least mention its name, but maybe I'm just missing it) village in West Bengal happened two days ago.

Sovereign Court

Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:
Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:
Usually I am happy to agree with any outlandish accusation against the United States that anyone cares to hurl,

I don't know what I was thinking.

Down with the US!

For women's liberation through socialist revolution!

---

I hate to keep sticking up for the US, Guy, and I'm going to go poke around about the Puritans (American and Britishiznoid), but I'd like to point out that while whatever they may have done 400 years ago is terrible, what happened in some (apparently nameless--isn't that weird? you'd think the NY Times would at least mention its name, but maybe I'm just missing it) village in West Bengal happened two days ago.

I think you might be missing what I was saying, the US still has some hang ups about sex and may still think it's fine oppressing women and her right to chose, but these days you're relatively progressive. You're talking about a part of the world with livestock roaming the streets, India might be evolving into a modern civilization but in many ways you're talking about the fringes and distant parts of the country where they haven't had their beliefs challenged for maybe hundreds of years (no Quakers you see). Really time has allowed our western civilizations feel morally smug when you hear about horrible crimes like this, but really I don't think we as a people were any different a couple hundred years ago. Heck in my lifetime being gay was something that made you less then human, to now, were people are actually shunning folks with homophobic beliefs.


Guy Humual wrote:
I think you might be missing what I was saying,

Probably. [bubble bubble bubble]

I found this:

Puritan Capital Punishment

The first guy who molested two little ten year old girls was sentenced to be "Severely whiped at Boston the next lecture day & have one of his nostrills slit so high as may-well bee, & then to be seared, & kept in prison, till hee bee fit to bee sent to Salem, & then to bee whiped againe, & have the other nostrill slit & seared; then further hee is confined to Boston neck [the peninsula of Boston], so as if hee be found at any time dureing his life to go out of Boston neck, that is, beyond the railes toward Roxberry, or beyond the low water marke, hee shalbee put to death upon due conviction thereof: and hee is also to weare an hempen roape about his neck, the end of it hanging out two foote at least, & so often as he shalbee found abroad without it, hee shalbee whiped; & if hee shall at any time hearafter attempt to abuse any p[er]son as formerly, hee shall bee put to death, upon due conviction."

Woah, I thought that's pretty gruesome, but, hey he molested two little girls in 1642, what do you expect?

And then a woman of loose morals was executed....for killing her baby. Ha, ha, I'm gonna get you, Humual, I'm thinking when next is

"Six years later, two more persons went to the gallows at Boston; James Britton, and Mary Latham, a young wife, 18 years old, from Plymouth. They had been found guilty of adultery."

and [deflates] I gave up.

I don't think I am being morally smug, though.

From Hyderabad to Hyannis, Massachuttes:

For Women's Liberation Through Socialist Revolution!

Sovereign Court

Another fun fact about puritan law was if those two girls had of been elven it might not have been considered rape as that was the age of consent at the time.

Look, what happened in India is pretty damn sickening for sure, and I hope these people get to face the full force of Indian law, but I also tend to think progress and prosperity are linked, and the last time America had water buffalo roaming the streets had to have been the 1960s at the latest. Also I'm positive Canada has a sordid past on this subject as well, we did have Catholics after all, but nothing as juicy or as sensational as those puritans that I'm aware of.


[facepalm]

I can't believe I misspelled "Massachusetts".

Sovereign Court

Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:

[facepalm]

I can't believe I misspelled "Massachusetts".

don't worry, no one expects goblins to spell words longer then four letters, never mind four syllables.


[Types a four-letter word, followed by a three-letter word]

Gobbo revolution's gonna getcha, Humual!

Sovereign Court

Oh, and I should add that I didn't think you were being morally smug, I was speaking more of our western culture as a whole. Folks just don't grasp history is all, but you being a well read goblin, probably realize that people have always been nasty animals and it's a constant struggle to battle our horrible barbaric true selves.


Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:

[Types a four-letter word, followed by a three-letter word]

Gobbo revolution's gonna getcha, Humual!

Oh, I know, were the words "love you?"


Of course it was.

Anyway, what little I have digested from the commie site about South Asia has made me even more sensitive to caste and communalism in Indian life and politics, so I went back to see if any of that came into play in the case. Well, I didn't see much, just that the groom was an "outsider," but, re-reading through some of the stuff I was struck by:

Guy Humual: ...but I also tend to think progress and prosperity are linked...

New York Times: Councils are often worried that marriages to outsiders will dilute communal land claims, among other concerns. Couples who defy the marital codes are sometimes murdered. Genetic researchers have found that India’s population has hundreds of distinct subgroups, in part because village councils have been enforcing marital codes and limiting intermarriage for centuries.

Anti-Caste: We understand that caste oppression is not simply a product of bigotry and irrationality. Caste in India is the foundation of the traditional systems of labor extraction in the villages, where nearly three-fourths of the population still lives. In the cities it plays an indispensable role in maintaining the capitalist order by keeping the working class divided. Sustaining—and sustained by—women's oppression, caste is closely bound up with the institution of the family in South Asia. An archaic remnant, it persists because scarcity persists, reinforced by imperialist exploitation. It will take a socialist revolution within the region and internationally to sweep away the caste system and build an egalitarian society founded on abundance. But only a party that fights to liberate all who are oppressed by caste—along with women; smallholders and the landless; Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, and other religious minorities; and all national groups and oppressed ethnicities, including tribals—will be able lead the workers of India and the region as a whole to power.

Vive le Galt!


Communist Afghanistan: The Musical Interlude


And, for Citizen Humual's delectation, back to anti-woman America:

F!+$ing finally

Sovereign Court

Well I suppose it's a win for the pro-choice side?

Sovereign Court

Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:

Anyway, what little I have digested from the commie site about South Asia has made me even more sensitive to caste and communalism in Indian life and politics, so I went back to see if any of that came into play in the case. Well, I didn't see much, just that the groom was an "outsider," but, re-reading through some of the stuff I was struck by:

Guy Humual: ...but I also tend to think progress and prosperity are linked...

New York Times: Councils are often worried that marriages to outsiders will dilute communal land claims, among other concerns. Couples who defy the marital codes are sometimes murdered. Genetic researchers have found that India’s population has hundreds of distinct subgroups, in part because village councils have been enforcing marital codes and limiting intermarriage for centuries.

Anti-Caste: We understand that caste oppression is not simply a product of bigotry and irrationality. Caste in India is the foundation of the traditional systems of labor extraction in the villages, where nearly three-fourths of the population still lives. In the cities it plays an indispensable role in maintaining the capitalist order by keeping the working class divided. Sustaining—and sustained by—women's oppression, caste is closely bound up with the institution of the family in South Asia. An archaic remnant, it persists because scarcity persists, reinforced by imperialist exploitation. It will take a socialist revolution within the region and internationally to sweep away the caste system and build an egalitarian society founded on abundance. But only a party that fights to liberate all who are oppressed by caste—along with women; smallholders and the landless; Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, and other religious minorities; and all national groups and oppressed ethnicities, including tribals—will be able lead the workers of India and the region as a whole to power.

Vive le Galt!

I think the old caste system is starting to dissolve in the major cities of India, much like the nobility class system dissolved in the UK during the industrial revolution. That's not to say that class doesn't matter anymore, class is still linked to wealth and wealth still carries with it many advantages, but wealth isn't the exclusive domain of the noble classes anymore. The caste system in India is a bit like the nobility class system and I suspect that upward mobility will soon be linked to wealth rather then caste. It's still going to matter for a long time, I mean people in England are still pretty touchy about class today, but you do have a future king of England married to a commoner now. Mind you the Duchess of Cambridge is still upper middle class, has some blue blood in her ancestry, but it is a sign that class doesn't matter as much as wealth and education.


I couldn't say. I can, however, bump a conversation I had with my union brother from Madras the day after Nelson Mandela died:

Desperately trying to change the subject I asked, "Hey, Yippin, what caste are you?"

"Huh?"

"Caste? What caste? Are you a dalit?"

"What?"

[Tries two or three different pronunciations of "dalit" without success]

"You know, an untouchable?"

"No, no, we don't do that anymore, we got rid of that."

"So, you don't have a caste?"

"I am in the Vaishya caste."

"And your wife?"

"She's a Vaishya, too."

"And you had an arranged marriage, right?"

"Yes."

"So you don't do caste anymore, huh?"

Sovereign Court

I remember you sharing that conversation :)

The thing is your friend might be sort of right as the untouchable class has been dissolving for a while now. Gandhi's humanitarian work started working on removing the severe stigma and social ostracization these people faced. It probably doesn't mean nearly as much being born into any of the lower castes as it did a century ago in the big cities. However I very much doubt they've gotten rid of the caste system and still feel it's legacy.

Reginald D. Hunter said “A class system is something you use to discriminate someone who looks like you” and a caste system is just a more evolved class system.


Again, I couldn't say. But that's never stopped me before.

In one of those moments of synergistic weirdosity that I love so much, one week I had a conversation with my Buddhist monk player about a book he was reading by B.R. Ambedkar which was pretty critical of India's treatment of the dalits post-independence.

Not long later, my favorite commie rag wrote an article about India which, in part, read:

Out of fear that the “untouchables” might unite with Muslims and act as a parliamentary counterweight, Congress co-opted dalit leader B.R. Ambedkar to head up the drafting of the constitution, which banned “untouchability” but left the caste system intact. Seats in parliament were reserved for “untouchables” and “tribals” (dalits and adivasis today). Later, as a minimal reform, a percentage of jobs in public employment were reserved for dalits and lower-caste members. Coming to regret his involvement in drafting the constitution, Ambedkar summed up independent India: “The same old tyranny, the same old oppression, the same old discrimination which existed before, exists now, and perhaps in a worse form.”

Link

In more of the full disclosure that Comrade Jeff appraciates so much, when I first found the anti-caste website, it was because I had googled a particular book review by Trotsky. But I think I know the guy who is one half of the anti-caste site. We were in the Sparts together. He was also a big fan of Gore Vidal and The Smiths.

Sovereign Court

keep in mind that B.R. Ambedkar passed away in the 1950s and I'd imagine that things might have changed a wee bit in the nearly sixty years since his passing (never mind whatever changes might have occurred between when the quote was given and his death). Seems like using that quote and trying to shoehorn it into a discussion about modern India seems a tad desperate.


Actually, no, I didn't realize that, although I guess all I had to do was read his wikipedia page.

More desperation.

And more desperation.

And even more desperation.

Sovereign Court

Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:

Actually, no, I didn't realize that, although I guess all I had to do was read his wikipedia page.

More desperation.

And more desperation.

And even more desperation.

You really need to stop assuming that my comments are attacks against you. I was referring to the author of the article you quoted and linked.

PS I am not desperately lurking in the chat window refreshing and waiting for a reply, even though the timing might make it seem that way, it seems that we're running on similar hours. But now that I got a reply I can sleep. I'll read your links later.


Vo Giap, Ambassador of Bachuan wrote:
Communist Afghanistan: The Musical Interlude

Clearly it was worth kicking the Russians out...


Guy Humual wrote:
You really need to stop assuming that my comments are attacks against you. I was referring to the author of the article you quoted and linked.

I was feeling shame-faced because I didn't realize his death date, even after I found his wiki page.

As I said, I mostly learned about him in conversation with my Buddhist monk player rather than actually reading about him.

Quote:
PS I am not desperately lurking in the chat window refreshing and waiting for a reply, even though the timing might make it seem that way, it seems that we're running on similar hours. But now that I got a reply I can sleep. I'll read your links later.

I'm just happy there's someone to keep me company.

Hello, Mr. Shifty!

Sovereign Court

Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:


More desperation.

And more desperation.

And even more desperation.

So ya, these articles do show that classicism/racism/castecism is very much alive in India, which I don't believe I ruled out, just as I wouldn't suggest that racism doesn't exist in Canada, but I still think that things in India are changing for the better. These stories all seem to have a degree of outrage associated with them, and not because the articles were probably written by western journalists, but because they report protest and outrage by the locals.

They're still disturbing reports, especially the schooling ones, one where you have children being bullied and intimidated by a teacher, and the other where a doctoral candidate had his life and academic career put on hold because the university didn't offer him the most basic level of support. The tragedy is that he ended up taking his own life. However, maybe sixty years ago, these stories might not have even peaked public interest. Change is a slow thing coming, especially were religion is concerned, but I like to think it's coming here as well as India.


I, of course, after reading three different cases of dalit oppression in a three month period from the end of last year, am nowhere near that confident.

I also don't get the sense that writers named Kumar Ashok, Prasanth Dontha or P. V. Srividya are westerners, although I imagine Leonard Dickens probably is.

I did however, take the liberty, of googling more stuff:

Mandal Commission Protests of 1990

Novemeber 2012: 3 Dalit colonies face mob fury in Dharmapuri

National Campaign for Dalit Human Rights

I admit it--I got all of these from the commie article that quoted Ambedkar. Perhaps they're cherry-picking, but shoehorning the quote doesn't seem very desperate to me.

But, I should also say, I haven't seen anything to indicate that the recent atrocity had anything to do with caste. It does, however, seem to have to do something with communal village land rights, which is why I quoted the Anti-Caste site about the economic backwardness of Indian rural communities, where, according to the A-C site, 80% of India's population still lives.

Sovereign Court

80% of India's population lives in rural communities? That sounds really odd to me.


Guy Humual wrote:
80% of India's population lives in rural communities? That sounds really odd to me.

Probably an older fact. The cia world fact book has it at

urban population: 31.3% of total population (2011)
rate of urbanization: 2.47% annual rate of change (2010-15 est.)


Guy Humual wrote:
80% of India's population lives in rural communities? That sounds really odd to me.

Hmm, I thought I had read that on the site but now I can't find it.

[Looks around some more]

EDIT: Duh, it's in the blurb I quoted, but it doesn't say 80% it says "three-fourths."

Stats and [bubble bubble bubble] don't go well together, I'm afraid.

I think the site was started in 2009. If BNW's (or rather, the CIA's) stats are correct, that would've put the rural population at 73.64% when they wrote it.

Sovereign Court

BigNorseWolf wrote:
Guy Humual wrote:
80% of India's population lives in rural communities? That sounds really odd to me.

Probably an older fact. The cia world fact book has it at

urban population: 31.3% of total population (2011)
rate of urbanization: 2.47% annual rate of change (2010-15 est.)

That's still around 68%, that's still much higher then I'd expect, but a little more believable then 80%


More topics for future research derived from the Anti-Caste site, some of whom I've heard of, some not.

Burakumin
Quinquelleros (whom don't even have their own wikipedia page and google wouldn't even give me anything in English)
Travellers (I assume we've all seen Snatch?)
Sri Lankan gypsies
Cagots

Semi-Racist Musical Interlude


More Clancy Brothers tunes and caste oppression


Don Juan de Doodlebug wrote:

And, for Citizen Humual's delectation, back to anti-woman America:

F+!$ing finally

At the risk of having to watch Citizen Humual gloat:

Canada does it right.


Don't get me started on Dalit oppression.


Well, if it comes with interesting articles to read, then, please, get started.

2,301 to 2,350 of 3,118 << first < prev | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / Gender / Sex Politics in the Real World All Messageboards