When can PFS NPCs break PFS rules?


Pathfinder Society

2/5

I'll start with the obvious, Liches.
They need to Craft their phylactery, so need a Craft feat.
Other NPCs presumably craft our items, so presumably have those feats too.
And of course, all the variant races are allowed.
So it can be done.

But I'm not really looking for instances, but rather the rules on breaking the rules.
-Can they take Leadership? (How about for a combat encounter?)
-Can they be Pure Azlanti? (Does this change their CR?)
-Can they keep their 'illegal' class feats and not swap them, or do they have to swap them like a PC?
-Can "no racial HD" humanoids take Bestiary feats?

And NPC followers:
-Can ACs/mounts take Bestiary feats?
-Can PCs' Eidolons?
-Can Familiars?

That's it for now, I reckon others will have questions to add.
(And apologies if my responses are delayed, I'm heading out camping soon.)
Thanks to all you answerers,
JMK

Grand Lodge 4/5

I don't think I have ever seen any NPC, anywhere, with the Leadership feat.

Unless the scenario or module includes time travel, I don't think pure Azlanti is available in "modern" Golarion. Closest I know of is Low Azlanti/gillman.

As far as I have seen and remember, NPCs in PFS scenarios, and Pathfinder Modules, are built using the normal Pathfinder rules, so NPC Wizards start with Scribe Scroll as their free feat instead of Spell Focus, etc.

Not usually on the Bestiary feats, since most of the feats won't benefit someone without what the feat modifies or gives.

ACs/Mounts can take those Bestiary feats explicitly listed in a legal resource.
Again, only if you can find a resource that explicitly allows a Bestiary feat for Eidolons.
Same, once more, for Familiars.

Paizo Employee Director of Brand Strategy

1 person marked this as a favorite.

NPCs aren't held to the same restrictions as PCs because they're not playing in an organized play campaign. The answer to all of your questions is "yes" with the caveat that we generally don't deviate from an established set of parameters in terms of what an NPC can and can't have in terms of ability scores, wealth, and feat selection. But if the PCs were to face, say a runelord from ancient Thassilon, who were all pureblood Azlanti, then that NPC would be that race and it's CR would reflect the rules for that particular human race.

Dark Archive 3/5 **

Mark Moreland wrote:

NPCs aren't held to the same restrictions as PCs because they're not playing in an organized play campaign. The answer to all of your questions is "yes" with the caveat that we generally don't deviate from an established set of parameters in terms of what an NPC can and can't have in terms of ability scores, wealth, and feat selection. But if the PCs were to face, say a runelord from ancient Thassilon, who were all pureblood Azlanti, then that NPC would be that race and it's CR would reflect the rules for that particular human race.

That response seemed awfully specific.

Silver Crusade 2/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
bdk86 wrote:
Mark Moreland wrote:

NPCs aren't held to the same restrictions as PCs because they're not playing in an organized play campaign. The answer to all of your questions is "yes" with the caveat that we generally don't deviate from an established set of parameters in terms of what an NPC can and can't have in terms of ability scores, wealth, and feat selection. But if the PCs were to face, say a runelord from ancient Thassilon, who were all pureblood Azlanti, then that NPC would be that race and it's CR would reflect the rules for that particular human race.

That response seemed awfully specific.

Working on favored enemy Thassilonian for my next ranger, I guess :D


kinevon wrote:
I don't think I have ever seen any NPC, anywhere, with the Leadership feat.

Eando Kline has the Leadership feat in Thousand Fangs Below. I only noticed because I was inputting him into Hero Lab the other day.

Grand Lodge 5/5

When did the GM/adventure ever have to play by the same rules as the players?

Shadow Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, Michigan—Mt. Pleasant

Dr. Tom, no offense, but this is about PFS, not adventure paths.

As for NPC's breaking the PFS rules, why would they even have to follow them? I mean pretty much every BBEG is already breaking the rules by being evil, so why bring it up? I guess the only thing I can think of is if Castilliano is planning on submitting a scenario?

2/5

Mark Moreland wrote:

NPCs aren't held to the same restrictions as PCs because they're not playing in an organized play campaign. The answer to all of your questions is "yes" with the caveat that we generally don't deviate from an established set of parameters in terms of what an NPC can and can't have in terms of ability scores, wealth, and feat selection. But if the PCs were to face, say a runelord from ancient Thassilon, who were all pureblood Azlanti, then that NPC would be that race and it's CR would reflect the rules for that particular human race.

(My bold.)

Thanks, Mark.
From your answer, it sounds 'generally' like PFS NPCs (both enemies and party members from class abilities) can take any Paizo feat they qualify for (except of course Leadership for party members).
I'll go with that for now when contemplating scenario design and my future Summoner.
Assumed as much about the 'why', and you've strengthened my assumption that any NPC parameters can be broken for specific, legitimate plot purposes and with reasoned adjudication.

Thanks again,
JMK

@kinevon, Bestiary feats are poor for PCs usually, but several PC builds can make great use of them (perhaps too great, which is why they're banned, and because it's hard to mitigate all the possible combos with PC builds.)
I've seen NPCs with Leadership too in Paizo products.
A scenario designer would have to play nice with any follower they made. Level X with level X-2 is typically CR+1, so the encounter should make up for it with the extra CR or some advantage/disadvantage to balance it back.
Eando's follower, for example, is dead/gone. (Or it's that insane gal who isn't much of a boon to him.)

Grand Lodge 5/5

bdk86 wrote:
Mark Moreland wrote:

NPCs aren't held to the same restrictions as PCs because they're not playing in an organized play campaign. The answer to all of your questions is "yes" with the caveat that we generally don't deviate from an established set of parameters in terms of what an NPC can and can't have in terms of ability scores, wealth, and feat selection. But if the PCs were to face, say a runelord from ancient Thassilon, who were all pureblood Azlanti, then that NPC would be that race and it's CR would reflect the rules for that particular human race.

That response seemed awfully specific.

He could just be referring to Rise of the Runelords. I hope not though. Kinda. 'Big K' is one bad mofo.

Grand Lodge 4/5 5/5

And any of the Runelords would destroy a party of level 12 PFSers without trying too hard.

It would be cool if we got to discover the fate of one of the runelords over the course of the season but that's probably just wishful thinking.

Grand Lodge 5/5

Clint Blome wrote:

And any of the Runelords would destroy a party of level 12 PFSers without trying too hard.

I thought about pointing that out as well, but then again the special for Gencon this year is for characters up to 12+. In RotR the party should be roughly level 17 (just one higher than currently achievable in PFS, I think) when they face Karzoug. And I'd be surprised if he isn't/wasn't one of the tougher of the seven of them. Having one lof them make an appearance in Gencon Special- Part 2 might be doable.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, Michigan—Mt. Pleasant

I'm not saying anything, except you might want to take a listen to the PFS seminar from Paizo by either downloading Steel-wind's enormous ~8 hour mp3 or waiting until Know Direction releases their edited version (at least I hope they recorded that one.)

Grand Lodge 4/5 5/5

Seth Gipson wrote:
*snip*Karzoug. And I'd be surprised if he isn't/wasn't one of the tougher of the seven of them.*snip*

According to JJ, he's right in the middle fo the power curve.

Grand Lodge 5/5

Eric Clingenpeel wrote:
I'm not saying anything, except you might want to take a listen to the PFS seminar from Paizo by either downloading Steel-wind's enormous ~8 hour mp3 or waiting until Know Direction releases their edited version (at least I hope they recorded that one.)

Where would I find such a thing?

Grand Lodge 4/5 5/5

Or you could just say it since this isn't exactly secret knowledge if it's in a podcast.

Scarab Sages

I believe that it was discussed at the "Inside Pathfinder Society" seminar at PaizoCon when I was there ... It's available at pathfinder-podcast.com, I believe.

M&M hinted strongly that there may be a Runelord involved around December or so .... And that it may or may not be Karzoug, if memory serves.

4/5

Quick thing Castilliano the reduced restrictions for NPC's only applies to the adventure NPCs, and not to a PC's Eidolons, Animal companions or Familiars (in the case that you give you familar feats through one of the legal methods).

I only mentioned this as you mentioned Summoner who is extremely limited on the feats his eidolon can take (no beastiary feats at all from what I remember), Animal companions have limited beastiary access described in the animal companion class feature area (as that consitutes another legal source with regards to the standard no beastiary feats rule for PFS), and familiars have either Animal Companion access (Diabloist class) or PC access (Beast bonded witches).

That being said its possible for PC's to get limited access to beastiary feats, so its best to create an advice thread once you have a more solid idea on your PC and the PFS players who frequent it can help you on which feats are/arent legal, which have extra pre reqs inside PFS.


Eric Clingenpeel wrote:

Dr. Tom, no offense, but this is about PFS, not adventure paths.

None taken; the poster I was responding to had made the statement that he'd never seen an NPC _anywhere_ with the Leadership feat, so I chimed in.

Grand Lodge 4/5

Dr Tom wrote:
Eric Clingenpeel wrote:

Dr. Tom, no offense, but this is about PFS, not adventure paths.

None taken; the poster I was responding to had made the statement that he'd never seen an NPC _anywhere_ with the Leadership feat, so I chimed in.

And I still haven't seen one, of my own knowledge, with the Leadership feat.

I started playing in a game of Kingmaker, which folded because they tried to bring it down to a reasonable number of people, and they lost too many. Only did a small part of the first book. And, other than a portion of Shackled City, has been my only AP.

None of the PFS scenarios, Pathfinder modules, LG scenarios, or other PFRPG/3.5E material I have played in or run have, so far as I can recall, had an NPC with Leadership.

Dark Archive

I don't remember whether this was a discussion I had when working on scenario writing for Keoland/SHE/BIS or it was something that I ran across in play during LG, but...

The discussion circled around an NPC with leadership. His leadership score was sufficient to have a maxed-progression follower, and the CR considered the follower the same as a class feature because the Leader had paid for it with a feat...

I seem to recall it was discussed and kicked for being *too* evil a way to squeeze another +1 CR into the fight without actually burning any more EL... Of course, this was when 3x APL+3 fights was the norm.

5/5

Seth Gipson wrote:
Clint Blome wrote:

And any of the Runelords would destroy a party of level 12 PFSers without trying too hard.

I thought about pointing that out as well, but then again the special for Gencon this year is for characters up to 12+. In RotR the party should be roughly level 17 (just one higher than currently achievable in PFS, I think) when they face Karzoug. And I'd be surprised if he isn't/wasn't one of the tougher of the seven of them. Having one lof them make an appearance in Gencon Special- Part 2 might be doable.

I did mention somewhere else around here that I guarantee even the highest level PFS characters (18 max right now) would be challenged in even part 1 of the Special. >:) Part 2? Well... we'll have to see if anyone survives.

The Special is a major event in Golarion and will require the best The Society has to offer in order to win the day.

Grand Lodge 4/5 5/5

Good thing I'm runing instead of playing then! We'd be hosed!

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/55/5 **

Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber
Clint Blome wrote:
Good thing I'm runing instead of playing then! We'd be hosed!

As a GM you may get picked to play part II, I know I am hoping I will be!

Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / When can PFS NPCs break PFS rules? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Pathfinder Society