Poll: Star Trek vs. Star Wars?


Gamer Life General Discussion

1 to 50 of 200 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>

To Vote, simply *favorite* a post below:

.

POLL: Which do you like better Star Trek or Star Wars ?

.


46 people marked this as a favorite.

.

Star Trek


45 people marked this as a favorite.

.

Star Wars


11 people marked this as a favorite.

========== END OF CHOICES ==========


13 people marked this as a favorite.

Meh. Babylon 5!

Grand Lodge

Well in all out battle, Star Trek has one major advantage.

Each Red Shirt has to perish in a unique fashion.


Can't Federation ships just use their transporter beams to place photon torpedoes onto most any Star War Universe ship?

I mean, if that's how it rolls, that's a distinct advantage.


ST get wrecked by SW expended Universe.

just TV+Movies'verses, I think ST can take it.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Belle Mythix wrote:

ST get wrecked by SW expended Universe.

Lucas, for what it's worth, rejects the SW Expanded Universe as not being canon.


7 people marked this as a favorite.

The Federation could whip the Empire's sorry butt and right quick.

Soldiers
Empire: One-hit wonders whose armor can't sustain a single hit in the shoulder.
Federation: Red shirts (same thing).

Reserves
Empire: Humans only, plus a handful of bounty hunters.
Federation: An alliance of thousands of like-minded species from different worlds plus the Klingon Empire.

Elites
Empire: One cyborg.
Federation: Fleets of Klingons who think today is a very good day to die.

Firepower
Empire: Blasters. One very slow ship capable of the occasional destruction of a planet.
Federation: Every ship outfitted with photon torpedoes, phasers, and access to disruptors.

Shields
Empire: Most ships explode from a single hit.
Federation: Six or seven photon torpedoes, and she's still at half power, Captain!

Special Powers
Empire: Two old guys with fading Force powers and barely a complete human body between them.
Federation: Transporters, mind melds, vulcan grip, Shatner Brand Karate Chop (TM).

Brains
Empire: An old dude who's constantly scheming, and his cyborg watchdog with family issues.
Federation: Spock. Data. Geordie. Scotty. Seven of Nine. I could go on...

Tacticians
Empire: Admiral Ozzel (deceased; killed for incompetence), Captain Needa (deceased; killed for incompetence), Admiral Piett (doomed).
Federation: Federation Trained Geniuses Kirk, Picard, Janeway, Pike, Rikker, etc.

If the Federation showed up in the Star Wars universe, they'd whip the Empire's butt before they even knew who was shooting at them, put the Rebel Alliance out of a job within a week, give everybody a pat on the head, and head home.


Star Peace

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

And then there is ...


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Bruunwald wrote:

The Federation could whip the Empire's sorry butt and right quick.

Horsepucky.


Kryzbyn wrote:
Bruunwald wrote:

The Federation could whip the Empire's sorry butt and right quick.

Horsepucky.

I'd like him to cite his sources. Sounds made up to me. Doesn't hold up to casual observation.

EDIT: LOL! What a joke. Like usual, the Star Trek guys made some effort to make the specs make sense in a real-world setting.

Book Researcher: How much energy does this put out, guys?

ST Writers: Well, extrapolating from the way technology has improved, and continues to, we'd say about 3.6 gigawatts.

BR: Cool. And how about you, Star Wars writers? How much to those ships put out?

SW Writers: What? What's a gigawatt? Well, we wanna be super cool powerful coolness guys, so let's say 300 million! Is that a lot? Yeah! Cool! Say that!!!

BR: Yeah... cool... (to self) Idiots.

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

Kryzbyn wrote:
Bruunwald wrote:

The Federation could whip the Empire's sorry butt and right quick.

Horsepucky.

The Star Trek Universe has one HUGE advantage over the Star Wars Universe: George Lucas.


You clearly did not read the site. Like at all.

The little box over in the upper left hand side is a menu.
The first page is a summary. A TL;DR if you will.
The menu leads to a thorough breakdown of individual technologies, tactics, etc. He sites all of his sources, hence all the footnotes at the bottom of the page.

Some of the stuff is glaringly obvious...
Like voyager would have taken 70 years to travel half the galaxy...in SW it's a few hour trip...

But I won;t spoil it for you.
Read it.

Read the hate mail section too. Funny stuff in there.

EDIT:
@ Bruunwald: Again. Read it.


Lord Fyre wrote:
Kryzbyn wrote:
Bruunwald wrote:

The Federation could whip the Empire's sorry butt and right quick.

Horsepucky.
The Star Trek Universe has one HUGE advantage over the Star Wars Universe: George Lucas.

Countered by Rick Berman.


Kryzbyn wrote:

You clearly did not read the site. Like at all.

The little box over in the upper left hand side is a menu.
The first page is a summary. A TL;DR if you will.
The menu leads to a thorough breakdown of individual technologies, tactics, etc. He sites all of his sources, hence all the footnotes at the bottom of the page.

Some of the stuff is glaringly obvious...
Like voyager would have taken 70 years to travel half the galaxy...in SW it's a few hour trip...

But I won;t spoil it for you.
Read it.

No, I went back and read it. It's total crap. That's why I edited my previous post to include this:

Book Researcher: How much energy does this put out, guys?

ST Writers: Well, extrapolating from the way technology has improved, and continues to, we'd say about 3.6 gigawatts.

BR: Cool. And how about you, Star Wars writers? How much to those ships put out?

SW Writers: What? What's a gigawatt? Well, we wanna be super cool powerful coolness guys, so let's say 300 million! Is that a lot? Yeah! Cool! Say that!!!

BR: Yeah... cool... (to self) Idiots.

Come on. The Star Wars guys don't even know what they're doing. They clearly threw out the biggest numbers they could come up with, just to be cool. It's like asking a little kid how much money is a lot, and he starts shouting out numbers with made-up names.

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

Kryzbyn wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Kryzbyn wrote:
Bruunwald wrote:

The Federation could whip the Empire's sorry butt and right quick.

Horsepucky.
The Star Trek Universe has one HUGE advantage over the Star Wars Universe: George Lucas.
Countered by Rick Berman.

True. However Rick Berman and Brannon Braga were both removed from the Franchise by Paramount.

George Lucas cannot be removed from Star Wars.


His power out put for turbolasers are based on this guy's work on the subject.


Lord Fyre wrote:
Kryzbyn wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Kryzbyn wrote:
Bruunwald wrote:

The Federation could whip the Empire's sorry butt and right quick.

Horsepucky.
The Star Trek Universe has one HUGE advantage over the Star Wars Universe: George Lucas.
Countered by Rick Berman.

True. However Rick Berman and Brannon Braga were both removed from the Franchise by Paramount.

George Lucas cannot be removed from Star Wars.

It's ok. He took his ball and went home. Seems he can't take criticism. Who knew?

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

Kryzbyn wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Kryzbyn wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Kryzbyn wrote:
Bruunwald wrote:

The Federation could whip the Empire's sorry butt and right quick.

Horsepucky.
The Star Trek Universe has one HUGE advantage over the Star Wars Universe: George Lucas.
Countered by Rick Berman.

True. However Rick Berman and Brannon Braga were both removed from the Franchise by Paramount.

George Lucas cannot be removed from Star Wars.

It's ok. He took his ball and went home. Seems he can't take criticism. Who knew?

ROTFLMOA

That said, I don't know what your take on J.J.Abrams version of Star Trek is. :)


Think about this for a moment. A gigawatt is 1 Billion Watts. That means the gun on the transport from that Star Wars freak - er, I mean fan's - site, puts out a single blast of 300,000,000 x 1,000,000,000 watts!

Extrapolate that. Let's say Han's blaster puts out only half that power. It's still enough to have melted away his half of the cantina when he shot Greedo. Hell, it may be enough to melt away all of Mos Eisley.

Clearly, the Star Wars guys pulled numbers out of their tuckuses. (Tucki?)

What you see on the screen can't possibly be anything near that. If it were, each time a TIE fighter shot an X-Wing, it would melt nearby ships and asteroids. Not to mention the TIE fighter that had taken the shot.


I liked it.
I like Star Trek as a franchise.
I just disagree with Bruun on the tech stuff.

Another minor nit pick is with ST:NG. They made it sound like humanity had to turn into a commune of hippies and nerds to create the Federation.
In Star Wars, humans are still a%+~&*@s, and leaps and bounds ahead technologicly, with none of the hippy feel good horsepucky (except for the occasional Jedi)...


Bruunwald wrote:

Think about this for a moment. A gigawatt is 1 Billion Watts. That means the gun on the transport from that Star Wars freak - er, I mean fan's - site, puts out a single blast of 300,000,000 x 1,000,000,000 watts!

Extrapolate that. Let's say Han's blaster puts out only half that power. It's still enough to have melted away his half of the cantina when he shot Greedo. Hell, it may be enough to melt away all of Mos Eisley.

Clearly, the Star Wars guys pulled numbers out of their tuckuses. (Tucki?)

What you see on the screen can't possibly be anything near that. If it were, each time a TIE fighter shot an X-Wing, it would melt nearby ships and asteroids. Not to mention the TIE fighter that had taken the shot.

Ok. Sure. Becasue the power pack on Han's blaster pistol is anywhere near the same as the reactors on a Star Destroyer, or that the fighters actually have capital ship-sized turbo lasers on them.

Seriously?

EDIT: The guy had pics from the movies of the size and scale of the things he as talking about, so the reader would know exactly to what he was referring. You have got to be being obtuse.

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I still go by Star Trek's Red Shirt Advantage. (mainly to show how silly such arguments are)


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I think that the plausibility of the various tech systems is a bit of a weird standard for defining which one you enjoyed watching more, but to each his own.

I went with Star Wars because I like it better, gut feeling-wise.

I realize I just picked 'feelings' over 'awesome tech thingies', and am thus banned from nerdhood forever. I'll be over there in yonder corner.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Lord Fyre wrote:


That said, I don't know what your take on J.J.Abrams version of Star Trek is. :)

I think your blogger has missed out on one very essential truth of Trek in all it's incarnations.

The show is a product of it's time. TOS reflected the views of Roddenberry's generation, a very conservative, xenophobic, and frequently reactionary bunch, which still had some very important values and virtues attached to it. For all of its good points TOS could justly be accused of racial and national tokenism, being very much in favor of the Vietnam War, and harshly critical of the progressive movements of it's day, and expressing several misogynistic viewpoints as well in it's treatment of female characters.

Star Trek TOS was listed as one of President Nixon's favorite shows, and given the politics it's creators expressed, that's not a major surprise. It was also the product of a time where we were looking forward to conveniences like automated grocery stores, radio tube trains, and personal flying station wagons for every American family by the 21st century, where we'd all be dressing like the Jetsons. Remember also at this time that America was 20+ years into the biggest economic boom it would ever know in it's history. Remember from the point of view of 60's Kirk it was an accepted fact that a woman could not make a starship commander. (TOS's treatment of the one female commander encountered in the series was not a rebuttal of that sentiment.)

TNG, literally being written a generation later and with Roddenberry more or less out of the command chair in production, expresses the values of a different generation who had different expectations especially in the matter of gender roles.

Similarly, the Abrams movie is a product of yet another Generation X, made for the Millennial market. It's the product of a generation which no longer has the 50's and 60's inherent optimism of what a new century will bring.

Interestingly enough, my spouse who is a decade younger than me, a child of the 70's had this one cogent thing to say about the movie.

"The series has finally grown up."


1 person marked this as a favorite.

No shields?


Cloaking Devices


2 people marked this as a favorite.
loaba wrote:
Belle Mythix wrote:

ST get wrecked by SW expended Universe.

Lucas, for what it's worth, rejects the SW Expanded Universe as not being canon.

And I, for what it's worth, reject the prequels for being crap.


pres man wrote:
loaba wrote:
Belle Mythix wrote:

ST get wrecked by SW expended Universe.

Lucas, for what it's worth, rejects the SW Expanded Universe as not being canon.
And I, for what it's worth, reject the prequels for being crap.

Join the club.

Shadow Lodge

Comparing numbers does not matter.

Which side will win is determined by which side the author wants to win.

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

pres man wrote:
loaba wrote:
Belle Mythix wrote:

ST get wrecked by SW expended Universe.

Lucas, for what it's worth, rejects the SW Expanded Universe as not being canon.
And I, for what it's worth, reject the prequels for being crap.

The supports my earlier statement. :)

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.
LazarX wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
That said, I don't know what your take on J.J.Abrams version of Star Trek is. :)

I think your blogger has missed out on one very essential truth of Trek in all it's incarnations.

The show is a product of it's time. TOS reflected the views of Roddenberry's generation, a very conservative, xenophobic, and frequently reactionary bunch, which still had some very important values and virtues attached to it. For all of its good points TOS could justly be accused of racial and national tokenism, being very much in favor of the Vietnam War, and harshly critical of the progressive movements of it's day, and expressing several misogynistic viewpoints as well in it's treatment of female characters.

Ironically - At Its Time - Star Trek was rightly considered liberal, socially progressive, racially inclusive and feminist. :)

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'd personally like to see the whole frakkin Federation be taken out Battlestar Galactica style.

The problem I have with this universe is everyone on the ships get along, work together and the status quo is always maintained. It is literally too civilized to be believable and hard choices are either condemned or avoided in a technobabble solution.

Give me Serenity/Firefly, Doctor Who, BSG, B5, Star Wars or any other show where character matters.

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

Kerney wrote:
The problem I have with this universe is everyone on the ships get along, work together and the status quo is always maintained. It is literally too civilized to be believable and hard choices are either condemned or avoided in a technobabble solution.

The 1966 Original Series was actually better about this then the later ones.

Sovereign Court

Kerney wrote:

I'd personally like to see the whole frakkin Federation be taken out Battlestar Galactica style.

The problem I have with this universe is everyone on the ships get along, work together and the status quo is always maintained. It is literally too civilized to be believable and hard choices are either condemned or avoided in a technobabble solution.

Give me Serenity/Firefly, Doctor Who, BSG, B5, Star Wars or any other show where character matters.

Try DS9 on for size.

Shadow Lodge

Kerney wrote:
It is literally too civilized to be believable and hard choices are either condemned or avoided in a technobabble solution.

Problems that can't be solved with sub-atomic particles literally don't exist in the Star Trek universe.

Shadow Lodge

Pan wrote:
Kerney wrote:

I'd personally like to see the whole frakkin Federation be taken out Battlestar Galactica style.

The problem I have with this universe is everyone on the ships get along, work together and the status quo is always maintained. It is literally too civilized to be believable and hard choices are either condemned or avoided in a technobabble solution.

Give me Serenity/Firefly, Doctor Who, BSG, B5, Star Wars or any other show where character matters.

Try DS9 on for size.

I know I probably quit on this too soon (Season 2 or 3) B5 was way better at the time and it was on a low point during my television nerderrey. The original series I agree is better.

But next gen just spoiled it for me.

On the other hand so much good stuff has come out my response is, why bother?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'll pass on Blahblahblah 5, thanks. Give me Farscape any day.

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.

The first four seasons of Babylon 5 stomped every incarnation of Star Trek that has existed into the ground...hard. Even the fifth season is better than all but a handful of the best episodes ever.

Silver Crusade

The Star Wars universe would fall to just one letter. "Q"

Also, just keep force users off your main view screen and everything will be okay.

Shadow Lodge

Bruunwald wrote:

Think about this for a moment. A gigawatt is 1 Billion Watts. That means the gun on the transport from that Star Wars freak - er, I mean fan's - site, puts out a single blast of 300,000,000 x 1,000,000,000 watts!

Extrapolate that. Let's say Han's blaster puts out only half that power. It's still enough to have melted away his half of the cantina when he shot Greedo. Hell, it may be enough to melt away all of Mos Eisley.

Clearly, the Star Wars guys pulled numbers out of their tuckuses. (Tucki?)

What you see on the screen can't possibly be anything near that. If it were, each time a TIE fighter shot an X-Wing, it would melt nearby ships and asteroids. Not to mention the TIE fighter that had taken the shot.

At least they got the actual units right on that one. Remember, Han Solo seems to think that a parsec is a unit of time.

Star Wars fails physics forever.

Oh, and obviously a couple of dozen redshirts could wipe out the most highly regarded warriors in the Star Wars universe...after all, a bunch of lobotomized clones did it.

RPG Superstar 2012 Top 16

They finagled the 'parsec' argument as actually meaning distance when Solo talks about it...it's a navigation feat, not just a time feat.

If you accept the hyperspace run through the Kessel hyperspace corridor is extremely dangerous and narrow, then finding a route through an area laden with black holes and gravity wells shorter then anyone else, assuming anyone can match the hyperspace multiplier, is a heck of an achievement.

Of course, in reality they just threw out the word because it sounded cool.

==Aelryinth

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

I know we are doing the whole "nerd" thing, but ...

We are really discussing the wrong things.

Which movies/TV series/Books/etc. do you enjoy more? Since neither Star Trek or Star Wars are real, that is the most important consideration.

Then we can get to sub-considerations:

  • Which setting has better characters?
  • Which setting has a better story/meta-plot?
  • Which setting "looks" more interesting (since both are visual media)?
  • Which setting has more interesting cultures both non-human and human?
  • Corollary to above: Which setting has has more interesting "non-humans"?
  • [finally] Which setting has technology that better lends itself to verisimilitude?

    I have my own answers to these questions (which can be inferred from my previous responses),

  • Grand Lodge

    Lord Fyre wrote:
    LazarX wrote:
    Lord Fyre wrote:
    That said, I don't know what your take on J.J.Abrams version of Star Trek is. :)

    I think your blogger has missed out on one very essential truth of Trek in all it's incarnations.

    The show is a product of it's time. TOS reflected the views of Roddenberry's generation, a very conservative, xenophobic, and frequently reactionary bunch, which still had some very important values and virtues attached to it. For all of its good points TOS could justly be accused of racial and national tokenism, being very much in favor of the Vietnam War, and harshly critical of the progressive movements of it's day, and expressing several misogynistic viewpoints as well in it's treatment of female characters.

    Ironically - At Its Time - Star Trek was rightly considered liberal, socially progressive, racially inclusive and feminist. :)

    Mostly by Trekkies who looked at it a decade or more later, with rose colored tricorders, while playing with their toy phasers.

    Feminist? By what standard? Then at time to most white males, Janice Lester would have represented "the feminist" of the show. It's very hard to support that assement by the treatment of female characters on the series.

    Seriously. I want you to name ONE... ONE female that wasn't either

    1. A racial/cultural Token - Uhura, Pavel "Mother Russia" Chekov (this was written remember when the "Russkies" were "Them". Chekov comes closer to an Saturday Night Live depiction of his people rather than a believable ethnic Russian. I guess that meats most Trekkie's standard of "inclusiveness"

    2. Who advanced the plot by being a sexual conquest by either Kirk or Spock.

    3. Lusting or puppy love on one of the main characters. Nurse Chapel.

    4. Man crazy in one or more ways.

    Am I knocking the show? Not really. Again it was a product of it's time and generation where just about everything was framed in the context of Ozzie and Harriet and the white male suburban viewpoint of what a perfect world of the future would be.

    Star Trek wasn't really that bad considering it's time. But it wasn't nearly as progressive as it was hyped to be by it's fans. Nor did it take any of the really imaginative leaps that Outer Limits or Twilight Zone dared.

    Grand Lodge

    Bruunwald wrote:


    Elites
    Empire: One cyborg.
    Federation: Fleets of Klingons who think today is a very good day to die.

    ... Usually while shooting AT THE FEDERATION. That's the problem, the Klingons would likely turn on the Federation and side with the Empire. They at least know how to respect the strong. :)


    LazarX wrote:
    Bruunwald wrote:


    Elites
    Empire: One cyborg.
    Federation: Fleets of Klingons who think today is a very good day to die.

    ... Usually while shooting AT THE FEDERATION. That's the problem, the Klingons would likely turn on the Federation and side with the Empire. They at least know how to respect the strong. :)

    They probably wouldn't however respect the empires habit of leaving a damned hatch open so one friggan hotshot pilot can fly in and blow up super expensive space station.


    A two meter wide shaft is a much less significant plot hole than the ones in any given ST episode or movie.

    Just sayin'.

    Damn you, Rick Berman.

    1 to 50 of 200 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>
    Community / Forums / Gamer Life / General Discussion / Poll: Star Trek vs. Star Wars? All Messageboards

    Want to post a reply? Sign in.