As of UltimateMagic, there are these inquisitions; alternate domains for Inquisitors.
In a game I DM, all my players are Shoanti Tribesmen. One of them is an Inquisitor. Since he finds his powers from a vast pantheon of ancestors, I houseruled he could pick up a Core God that matches the entity he worships and choose powers accordingly. We worked it up into a NeutralGood Gorum.
That was BEFORE Ultimate Magic came out. I gave all players 3 years downtime, a couple of levels, and the ability to retrain either a feat, or change archetype and such. The said Inquisitor wanted the Anger Inquisition.
What I didn't realize is that this Lawful Good Inquisitor has Rage at level 6. I find the concept very interesting, you know, divine wrath and all... but the ability says "Rage as a barbarian."
I know by core this doesn't happen, Gorum being Chaotic, so I ask you guys : Is being lawful removing that Inquisitor the ability to rage, speaking RAW ? Or is the No-Lawful element part of the barbarian class only?
I think this needs a bump.
Really, the only real difference between a Chaotic Neutral Inquisitor of Gorum and your Lawful Good Inquisitor of a homebrew "god" is their alignment. Unless there is a Lawful spell that he would normally be banned from that is utter broken with rage, there's really no mechanical problem.
I think it sounds pretty cool. If you like the idea and can see it working, go for it.