APG classes and associated class levels

[Jadeite]

For monsters with class levels, how would you categorize the APG classes?
Alchemist - Skill
Anti-Paladin - unassociated, same as paladin
Cavalier - Combat and Skill, same as fighters, barbarians and rangers
Inquisitor - Skill, same as bard
Oracale - Spell, same as cleric
Summoner - unassociated, his main feature is the eidolon which isn't boosted by any other class
Witch - Spell

[seekerofshadowlight]

Not really clear on what your asking here.

[Jadeite]

seekerofshadowlight wrote:

Not really clear on what your asking here.

http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/monsters/monsterAdvancement.html

Under Adding Class Levels.

[Bruno Kristensen]

Looks fairly good, yeah.

[Tanis]

Alchemist - Spell/Skill
Anti-Paladin - Combat/Skill
Cavalier - Combat/Skill
Inquisitor - Combat/Skill
Oracale - Spell
Summoner - Spell/Skill
Witch - Spell

[Umbral Reaver]

Summoner would be unassociated. Its spell progression would only count as associated if the creature already has summoner casting, and it has 2 skills/level so it's not a skill class. And the eidolon becomes exponentially weaker the more nonsummoner HD a creature has, so it's pretty rubbish for any kind of creature with HD.

[Are]

Jadeite wrote:

Anti-Paladin - unassociated, same as paladin

I'd put Anti-Paladin as Combat, but then I don't understand why the Paladin is nonassociated in the first place. It adds to the abilities of Combat monsters just as well as Fighter, Barbarian or Ranger.