
![]() |

So, spells like blur and displacement give a benefit to their targets that results in a miss chance. Blur specifically states that it grants concealment (and the commensurate 20% miss chance). Displacement on the other hand, states that the target benefits from a 50% miss chance "as if it had total concealment."
Since displacement states that "unlike actual total concealment, displacement does not prevent enemies from targeting the subject normally," I am inclined to believe that true strike basically allows the caster to ignore the effects of both blur and displacement, albeit for only a single attack roll, because the text for true strike states that "you are not affected by the miss chance that applies to attackers trying to strike a concealed target." Does this seem accurate? Or should it be because displacement is not "actual" concealment, the effects of true strike (at least the negating of miss chance) are nullified?

![]() |

This should be a fun thread.
I feel that since true strike states 'miss chance' and 'concealed' in its wording, it should negate both spells. Because you are not affected by miss chances, and you can strike concealed targets. The target does not have to be both concealed and have a miss chance for the spell to work. The spell negates both conditions.