| wraithstrike |
When your particular group has in an issue with a class, feat, or what have you instead of saying _______ is overpowered/broken/over 9000(is that the right number).
How about:
X is to powerful for my group
X is overpowered? <---- Do you see that question mark?
What can I do about X
What can I do about X? It is ruining my game
My playstyle does not mesh well with X. What can I do?
The difference is that X is overpowered makes it into a generalization. The problem is that over 95% of the time there is an error on the DM's or player's part. If most of us don't have an issue with it then your generalization is not correct, and your opening post determines how people will respond to you.
If you say X is broken, and I have no issues with it I will immediately look for flaws on your part, as will many others. The reason is that it makes me defensive. I can't speak for other, but I for one know that I don't want to see the game watered down. It is better to help other player's or DM's improve.
If you say it's a problem for your group I will think of ways to adjust it to the way you play. That is all.
PS: Before anything is taken out of context I am not telling anyone how to play. I don't care what anyone bans, but a blanket statement makes it seem like the ability in question should be done away with. If I(all of us) don't question the blanket statement the designers come out with nerfhammers, and maybe some DM's will to. I also never know if I will end up at one of you guy's tables or some other guy influenced by the interewebs.
| KenderKin |
I saw all this about X
X is to powerful for my group
X is overpowered?
What can I do about X
What can I do about X?...is ruining my game
My playstyle does not mesh well with X. What can I do?
I think your right even if X saw it he might not know it is about him specifically....
But he is so vain he might think this thread is about him!
| KenderKin |
OK since you want a serious thread discussion of naming the thread I think the conventions shoulod be similar to MLA format for naming historical persons
As I recall the first time you refer to Jesus the full descriptor includes full & family of orgin name, geographical location and general function/purpose.
Jesus Christ, son of God, of Nazareth and .......
No more serious!
The thread next door
Thread does Dallas
Thread unwrapped
Who shaved thread?
| meabolex |
How about:
X is to powerful for my group
X is overpowered? <---- Do you see that question mark?
What can I do about X
What can I do about X? It is ruining my game
My playstyle does not mesh well with X. What can I do?
Hmmmm. . . . possible thread names:
X is too powerful for my stupid players
Gygax and I agree: X is overpowered.
X: What can I do to convince you you're wrong?
What can a perfect, godly GM do about X?
And the best thread title:
You are wrong; I am right. /thread