Special Magic Item


GM Discussion

Sovereign Court

I am getting ready to start running Society scenarios for my regular gaming group. One of my players wants a "small" specialized magic item. He wants an Everburning Ring... which is essentially continual flame cast on a ring instead of a piece of wood. His point is that since Everburning Torch is on the equipment list, this ring isn't THAT much of a stretch. My first though is to say "no" to avoid any confusion for possible DMs in other games. Am I being too rough? Is there a rule I'm missing that would handle this?

Paizo Employee Director of Brand Strategy

Unless an "everburning ring" appears in one of the legal sources, it is not allowed. I can tell you with certainty that there are no "everburning rings" in any of the books listed in the Guide to Pathfinder Society Organized Play, so it is not legal. If he wants to buy an everburning torch, he can do so. Having a light source requires a free hand to hold it, so having it on a ring could be unbalancing. I suggest he ask a caster in the party to cast light (an at-will orison/cantrip) on his mundane ring instead.

Sovereign Court

yoda8myhead wrote:
Unless an "everburning ring" appears in one of the legal sources, it is not allowed. I can tell you with certainty that there are no "everburning rings" in any of the books listed in the Guide to Pathfinder Society Organized Play, so it is not legal. If he wants to buy an everburning torch, he can do so. Having a light source requires a free hand to hold it, so having it on a ring could be unbalancing. I suggest he ask a caster in the party to cast light (an at-will orison/cantrip) on his mundane ring instead.

OK.. so he couldn't buy it. But if it's OK for the party caster to place light on a ring every 10 minutes per level, why can't he pay to get Continual Flame cast on a ring? Certainly, the cost wouldn't be the 110gp for the torch. It would be Caster Level X Spell Level X 10 + material cost + material cost penalty (1/10 the cost of the material focus). This adds up to:

Caster Level = 5
Spell Level = 3
MAterial Cost = 50 gp in ruby dust
Penalty = 5 gp
5 X 3 X 10 + 50 + 5 = 205 gp

This would be covered under Chapter 8: Purchasing Spellcasting Services in the Pathfinder Society Guide. The only thing I see that would hinder this, is the final sentence in the chapter:

Finally, as noted in Chapter 6, any spell cast during the
course of a scenario ends at the end of that scenario.

In that case, no permanent spells can be purchased what so ever. Is my interpretation correct?

5/5

You probably need Josh for an official answer, but I'd say buying a casting like that could work.

I would also say having a flame coming out of his hand (even a non-burning one) constantly would be rather distracting and attention drawing. You can't turn it off after all.

Sovereign Court

Majuba wrote:

You probably need Josh for an official answer, but I'd say buying a casting like that could work.

I would also say having a flame coming out of his hand (even a non-burning one) constantly would be rather distracting and attention drawing. You can't turn it off after all.

I was afraid of that... and my calculations are for a cleric.. not a wizard. Just to clarify, for a wizard (or sorcerer), it would be:

3 X 2 X 10 + 50 + 5 = 115

This whole topic seems like such a quibbly thing, though. I'm just trying to get a firm answer on permanent spells.. I guess. The whole idea of Permanency being thrown out has me confused AND there was a similar topic back in Season 0 centered around a guy who wanted Continual Flame on his sword... so I was just looking for some clarity. :)

Sovereign Court 2/5

I assume the permanent spells are disallowed to keep continual effects from spanning multiple adventures. If that's the logic, then continual flame would fall along the same lines.


Spacelard wrote:
Surely an Everburning Ring is a curse...

Sovereign Court 4/5

Can't you just buy an everburning torch and tape it in your character's head? Or let it swing from her belt? Forge a torch-holder in your fullplate and keep it there?

:)

Sczarni 4/5

Deussu wrote:

Can't you just buy an everburning torch and tape it in your character's head? Or let it swing from her belt? Forge a torch-holder in your fullplate and keep it there?

:)

put it in the canteen pocket of your backpack - you know, the mesh one with the draw-string


I would say no.
My previous post was a bit tongue in cheek but I do have to ask the question, why?
I can visualise the character wandering around with his hand on fire looking, frankly, stupid. Is it just trying to get around holding a torch in his hand?

If you do allow it then be prepared for other players asking for unique items.
And have tubes of anusol turn up in the treasure for his "problem".

Sovereign Court

Spacelard wrote:

I would say no.

My previous post was a bit tongue in cheek but I do have to ask the question, why?
I can visualise the character wandering around with his hand on fire looking, frankly, stupid. Is it just trying to get around holding a torch in his hand?

Pretty much...yes...


Elf_NFB wrote:
Spacelard wrote:

I would say no.

My previous post was a bit tongue in cheek but I do have to ask the question, why?
I can visualise the character wandering around with his hand on fire looking, frankly, stupid. Is it just trying to get around holding a torch in his hand?
Pretty much...yes...

Just say No and have done with it.

Sounded like someone just trying to get around something. I'm very wary of players like that. IMO that is the main reason there is/was 150 Prestige Classes, "I want to cast spells and wear armor but don't want to use a metamagic feat so I'll swop out to EK".


yoda8myhead wrote:
Unless an "everburning ring" appears in one of the legal sources, it is not allowed. I can tell you with certainty that there are no "everburning rings" in any of the books listed in the Guide to Pathfinder Society Organized Play, so it is not legal. If he wants to buy an everburning torch, he can do so. Having a light source requires a free hand to hold it, so having it on a ring could be unbalancing. I suggest he ask a caster in the party to cast light (an at-will orison/cantrip) on his mundane ring instead.

This. And there are no item creation rules, so doubly this.

Scarab Sages

Spacelard wrote:
Sounded like someone just trying to get around something. I'm very wary of players like that.

Aren't ALL requests by players, attempts to get around something?

LOL

Sovereign Court

Snorter wrote:
Spacelard wrote:
Sounded like someone just trying to get around something. I'm very wary of players like that.

Aren't ALL requests by players, attempts to get around something?

LOL

Thanks for all the help, everyone... especially the massively over worked Joshua Frost. :)

Community / Forums / Organized Play / GM Discussion / Special Magic Item All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in GM Discussion