
Craig Clark |

It remains to be seen, honestly. If I get my way it will be "set" in Greyhawk but easily adaptable to the Realms or Eberron, with appendices of conversion notes for each.
I may not get my way. It is not 100% up to me.
--Erik Mona
Editor-in-Chief
Dragon & Dungeon
Well lets hope you get your way then, Erik. My Dungeon subscription is pretty much contingent on Greyhawk content and so far I feel the magazine has been well above my expectations.

Big Mac |
I think it is great idea to set the new adventure path firmly in the realm of greyhawk. I and my players are really enjoying the first path. My only gripe was it was to generic. I also feel that your idea to have appendices of conversion notes is a bullseye idea. We all know DMing is a lot of work, however many of us just don't have the time to undergo a conversion of this size. Looking forward to path 2. Keep up the great work
Big Mac

Craig Clark |

Hopefully this will get clarified soon, obviously I am rooting for some new setting information for Greyhawk... the more detailed the better.
My sources on the situation (mainly rumor and innuendo) have the feeling the LG and it's Triads don't want Dungeon stepping on their toes.
Lets hope cooler heads and the huge fanbase of Greyhawk win the day.

zoroaster100 |

I would like to see the next Adventure Path set in Greyhawk. I think it would be smart not to tie the adventures too much into Greyhawk specific stuff which is hard to convert to Forgotten Realms or Eberron, but it would be nice to have definite Greyhawk locations associated with all the Adventure Path adventures in this next series.