![]() ![]()
![]() LazarX wrote:
I'll have a proper look at it, then. But they've not shown any enthusiasm for a move from 3.5 to pathfinder, so it might be too powerful as is. As for lack of a meat shield, I take care to avoid creatures that dish out huge amounts of damage. (In game, I figure no-one's going to give them a commission that requires a meat shield.) The rest of the party's a druid, wizard and monk. I can't ever hit the monk, the dice rolls turn against me when I try. ![]()
![]() Dark_Mistress wrote:
I'm fairly happy with what I run and when and they each run two characters pretty well (pairs of siblings). Its less 'too few chars' and more 'remember they don't have anyone with high BAB and HPs' (eg. Dire wolf bite damage is scary). And the players are both nicely paranoid, despite the fact I can't remember the last time I succeeded in inflicting damage on anyone. Actually, I do. I attacked them with 2 necrophidi(i?) but had picked up the giant spider card by mistake and inflicted the wrong poison damage. Which would have been OK except it was going to be the same poison damage when they met the spiders. Who never bit them anyway, so it didn't matter after all. I don't actually want to commit myself to a set time, as RL too often happens. I want to get better at having done enough prep and being organised that I can grab moments when otherwise we're getting bored. ![]()
![]() Nevynxxx wrote:
Thanks, will do ![]()
![]() Abraham spalding wrote:
Possibly picky of me, but I like to to be able to see at Amazon whether I will have everything, not trawl about the internet looking for confirmation. My thoughts are 'isn't that what the blurb is for?'. Though I guess checking the Paizo product page isn't a big deal.I've probably ignored good modules (not pathfinder) because they don't have guidlines on expected party levels. ![]()
![]() James Jacobs wrote:
. So far I have bought Paizo products from amazon uk. If it isn't in the amazon blurb I'm not going to see it. I haven't recently visited my nearest, very small games shops, but would expect Paizo stock to be limited at best. ![]()
![]() Wolfthulhu wrote:
(My first adventure into posting and am unaccountably nervous, so excuse errors (also too much coffee this morning)). I think it best to describe a typical(?) gaming session. I consider myself new to Gm'ing, so I probably make all the typical mistakes. 1. No fixed timetable for play. They spend every other weekend with their dad and school evenings, homework has to come first. On free weekends or evenings someone doesn't feel up to it,or any number of
2. As a consequence, it's normally 'lets play DnD (sorry. old habits) this weekend, or tomorrow, or in an hour, or what ever. It would be ideal for me if I could say, 'right, let's play in half an hour'. 3. Consequently, I prep the games as best I can, for play at some future date, and have probably forgotten important points by the time I get to play (yeah, yeah, better prep and notes, I know). 4. Running still makes me nervous, at least when we start up. I lose notes, forget where things are in the books, can't find the books, 'cause they've sidled off and hid under the sofa, etc. The fewer bits of paper I have to shuffle the happier I am. I am geting much better at statting up the monsters on cards before hand,instead of flicking through the book) so in theory for me its no big deal to do that at the computer and applying the simple templates looks easy enough. Not so clear, though, if this is true for a complete beginning DM, like me a year ago, say. 5. I would say a reccommended easy alternative is absolutely essental [/] (for me at least) as I have little confidence in picking an appropriate CR for a substitution. I am very, very reluctant to accidentally inflict a TPK on my two young teenagers, especially when I then have to live with them. And they don't have a martial character. Which probably makes this all baloney, since I'll have to vet monsters for too high AC's HPs and damage anyway (TPK, here we come). I have little concern about making other options available for others, as long as they are just that - [b] options. Having only got the core rule book and bestiary last month, and this being the first 'campaign' ever for my kids, I'm a long way from exhausting them. Which will be true for anybody starting out. (BTW, I played ADnD at Uni many, many moons ago, with an eccellent DM, whom I mentally thank nearly every session. I doubt i'd have managed at all otherwise). So, I am hopelessly disorganised (but slowly getting better) and the closer I can get to just needing the AP and core books, the less stressful it becomes, and the more I am likely to offer to run it at short notice. Why might this be a concern to Paizo? Get my kids hooked now and they're potential customers for life. ![]()
![]() Gregg Reece wrote:
I, on the other hand, am a single mother on a low budget, occasionally running games for her two teen-age school children. We have only the books I have bought for us, and the room containing our computer barely has enough room for all three of us to sit down, never mind play an rpg, so internet access during play is not an option. I do not have an i-phone or kindle (or a husband or partner with access to either) and neither do my children. My printer has an irritating habit of going wonky or running out of ink if I actually need to print something out. Buying the APG and bestiary II is a major outlay for me, and they are not at the top of my wish list (like APs for example so we've actually got adventures to play). Printing out the PDFs must also add up. I don't know how typical your own access to technology is, but I would hate for my family to be pushed out of pathfinder rpg due to assumptions about mine. And, obviously, people with no internet access can't post their opinions here at all. As for the actual question, while I can see wanting to use all the new stuff, there will (hopefully) always be newcomers, and for them (us?) it's essential that there are at least some APs or modules that only require the core rulebook and bestiary, and that they're easy to identify. It needs to be made very clear if they do not |