cheechako's page

Organized Play Member. 95 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.



1 person marked this as a favorite.
Ulfen Death Squad wrote:

A bard whose performance is with spoons and the ssoundgardensong: spoon man

Just team up with a Knife Master and someone wielding a Fighter's Fork, and you're all set!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
wraithstrike wrote:
Yeah it works, but I dont think you can use a wand with spellstrike because you are not casting the spell.
FAQ wrote:
Other than deploying the spell with a melee weapon attack instead of a melee touch attack, the magus spellstrike ability doesn’t change the normal rules for using touch spells in combat

So, if you use a wand of touch-spell, you get a free attack. Spellstrike allows the magus to deliver the charge from a touch spell via their melee weapon. That is all spellstrike does.

If the spell is a Magus spell (and Spell Blending puts it on the list) and the weapon is a Magus/spellstrike weapon, then the wand can be used (no UMD needed) and the touch can be delivered through the weapon.

Since the spell in question is a Ray, then Close Range would also be needed. Just remember that Close Range only gives you one touch - you loose the other rays from any spell that has multiple.

Wand Wielder is required if you want to attempt this in Spell Combat. Without that arcana, you must cast the spell.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I don't recommend the low WIS. However, it is a legal way of not getting spells, so technically that is one of your options.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Revolving Door Alternate wrote:
Plus real life being what it is, I’m quite sure we won’t all always be able to make all the game times.

So it is really just attempted murder.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Jordo13 wrote:
In closing, based on the facts of what Spellcraft does, it seems it should be a logical alternative to Use Magic Device. The same way Wizards and Sorcerers both draw on Arcane Magic, though in two entirely different ways. Study Vs. Intuitive.

Did someone say study? Pragmatic Activator trait


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I once stored my motorcycle in a storage unit. When I took it out, there was an identical motorcycle still stored in there.

Well, not really, because that is not what "storing" means.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Barong wrote:
Elohim is a name used for god. It's like slapping the name 'Jesus' on a monster that is made up of man-eating daisies.

And Elohim are also (supposedly) a species of extraterrestrials that created and populated the Earth. The one eye seems very Illuminati too, although Illuminati has nothing to do with Raelism.

This whole create a place, populate it, and then leave is obviously based on some rough concept of Rael's space-aliens. I am unfamiliar with any Judeo-Christian faiths that claim on the seventh day, God just up and left, so I don't see the connection between the PF Elohim and that God.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Thelemic_Noun wrote:
So, I don't think anyone could possibly claim that the elohim is not modeled directly off of the Judeo-Chrisitian God

I could, but then again, I've heard of Raelians before.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Exocrat wrote:


- give the witch a small but cumulative arcane spell failure chance as her voice gets raspy from all the cackling. Say, 5% per ten minutes;

I think it would be fair to use the same chance the fighter has to get chaffed from all the armor wearing and suddenly have to stop doing that.

Cackling is noisy. It shows that the character is doing something, and is probably someone to be targeted. The obvious stuff is obvious. The penalties you listed are not penalties - they are the dangers and difficulties of using the ability.

A house-ruled 5% cumulative penalty per turn because you are using a class ability seems very wrong.