Yuriyuyeimi |
Hey everyone! Korskov the alchemist Here.
I'm currently running a grenadier (9th lvl) and I'm researching a spell to get a single huge explosion. I know going for more bombs via rapid bombs is the "meta", but this is just for the luls.
Please tell me what you think about the next spell:
Korskov's Kocktail Bomb admixture
School: Transmutation; Level: Alchemist 4
Casting Time: 1 standard action
Components: V,S,M, (1 dose of Unstable accelerant Cost 50 gp)
Range: Personal
Target: You
Duration: 1 Round/Lvl or until discharged.
Upon drinking an extract created with this formula, you make a significant change to your magical reserve that modifies the nature of all bombs you create and throw during this extract’s duration. This effect on your magical reserve has no effect on any discoveries that you use to modify your bombs, but you can only have one admixture effect (formula with the word “bomb admixture” in its title) active at a time. If you drink another bomb admixture, the effects of the former bomb admixture end and the new one becomes active.
When you throw a bomb and hit a direct target, it goes off in the most lovely of explosions, creating an additional Fireball effect centered on the target. While this admixture is in effect, you can't change the bomb's energy type damage or make use of the Precise Bombs" discovery.
Now, Would it be better to bump it to 4th lvl or is it good at 3rd?
Are the last two "conditions" enough? or are they too much? ( I know you could end up throwing lots of dice with this spell, but fire damage is the most resisted energy type, that's where Incendiary catalyst comes in, but that's unrelated.
For it's duration, I was actually thinking on putting another restriction on the spell, and it would be along the lines of "because of the volatility of this new compound, this bomb will go off at the end of your next round, wether you fire it or not." This would go in line with the flavor of my character who often crafts huge but unrealible explosives. But at that point it was getting heavy on restrictions and I thought it may be better that "because of it's instability the compound goes inert after one round", didn't end up adding it to the description though and went with the "or until discharged" clause. opinions on this topic?
Thanks in advance for any input.