James,
Thank you again for taking all these questions from your users and fans! After having tried to communicate with developers in other companies, I have become only more appreciative of your willingness to engage with your community.
1) An artifact was introduced in my home game which took the form of a black tome with a special connection to an (unnamed) infernal lord. Its user may pen a question in blood inside the tome, and receive a clear and unambiguous answer six hours later from the fiend. Thus far it has operated with seemingly perfect omniscience, providing answers to certain intrigues and state secrets that may never have been revealed otherwise. How would you, were you the GM, spin such an artifact such that it remains consistent with its unusually candid and accurate replies, but at the same time is far more than a mere divinatory device?
2) Disregarding schemes for immortal rule, do you feel that Queen Abrogail Thrune would seek to perpetuate her ruling line by marrying a consort and producing an heir to the throne of Cheliax, or is merely the goal of "House Thrune remains in control" sufficient enough from her perspective to allow another relative to take over after her time? In the case of former, what sorts of characteristics, station and pedigree do you think feel she would find desirable? (For example, seeking to wed someone as or less ambitious than herself, or primarily pursuing the political advantages of bringing another vassal into Cheliax's sphere by marrying another monarch, etc.)
3) Would she or any other major ruler in Avistan contemplate wedding one of the more attractive and wealthy Runelords if given the chance? Say, Karzoug or Sorshen, on a voluntary basis (and I'm sure you must agree that Karzoug is a nice-looking gentleman with plenty of financial security).
4) If a mythic character takes the Legendary Item path ability, but later feels another item would be better served as their item of focus, would you as a GM allow them to retrain or alter their Legendary Item ability to apply to the new item instead?
4a) Let's also propose that a mythic character taking the Legendary Item ability wants to apply it to an item which is already a lesser or greater artifact. Do you think that the "item must be a lesser/greater artifact to select this ability" prerequisite for certain abilities would be met by default, or would you feel it more appropriate to require taking multiple instances of the Legendary Item path ability as normal so that an pre-existing artifact is not inherently advantaged over a non-artifact item when selecting its legendary abilities?
5) How do you feel the major Inner Sea nations (Cheliax, Andoran, Taldor, Qadira, and Osirion) would regard an Absalom that ushers in a highly nationalist government and began asserting its influence over its neighbors?
Lastly, this is something I have been thinking about for several weeks now and wanted to air out for you. In the past, you have maintained a degree of ambiguity as to just what the Peacock Spirit was/is, whether it was truly a deity or something else. It is also known that Runelord Xanderghul was a worshiper. Acknowledging and paying worship to an obscure power greater than himself - and from a position of rulership - seems slightly uncharacteristic for a Runelord of Pride. However, peacocks as you know are themselves popularly associated with pride... and, in an earlier series of answers, you mentioned that while a mythic character with Divine Source could technically worship himself, such an act would be astonishingly arrogant and worthy of only the most narcisisstic and excessively proud of beings. That so little is known of the Peacock Spirit, and that mythic Runelord Xanderghul, the paragon of pride (and "holder of the Peacock Throne" himself), would deign to both pay and promote its worship, could suggest a more fundamental connection between the two after certain analysis, might you say?