Blakmane wrote:
Interestingly it diversifies the feats a caster might want to take to not only improve their A.o.E.'s but also increase them. Anything to diversify classes I'm, tacitly, in favour of. I agree with O.P. counterspelling should be easier and I like the idea of a pool of points like Psionics but I agree that the pool seems too big at higher levels. I feel like reducing the amount of points makes it more meaningful as a choice while also allowing the caster to have some fun because sometimes their spells will get through.
I'd say Pathfinder is more dense than 3.5 is but in a substantially superior way. 3.5 is great and PF recognizes that but Wizards never took full advantage of it. Paizo has created a campaign setting which they expand on constantly in a coherent fashion (unlike Greyhawk or Færûn) through novels, comics, short stories, one shot adventures, a videogame, and finally and most importantly:; Adventure Paths. Through it all they manage to include something for every player type (again, in a coherent fashion) which is far superior to what Wizards was ever willing to do with 3.5. or what they're willing to do with any edition of D&D. I do worry about the "bloat" from time to time but I've decided all I really want is the A.P.'s, I can just use the S.R.D. to build any charactor I could want without having to pay for the "bloat". |