Rudimus's page

Do your posts magically add the words "You can't use two-hand weapons when two weapon fighting" to the rules?

Cartigan, you are just being obtuse with this statement. Of course you can't use a two handed weapon when using the two weapon fighting feat. There is a Two Handed feat. There is nothing saying a Monk can not use a weapon two handed, but you can't use the Two Weapon Fighting feat when doing so, it doesn't have to say it. If you are using this way, you certainly have the right, but it is just plain ignorant.

On a slightly different note here, my DM said we can't use the Temple Sword when using Flurry of Blows, because it isn't specifically listed, and it has a 19-20 critical range. I have been browsing the forums and can't find where he found this. But, he is the DM so his word is law. I just want to find out where he got this rule.

I am also part of ObiDaveKenobi and Chadlee's gaming group. I was thinking of ObiDave's post of Rule/Spirit/Intent. What is a cleave? It is one big swing, chopping through 1 opponent into the others. I believe that is why Wizards made it a full attack, it is full effort. But I have to say I agree with the mechanic in Pathfinder. You take your one big swing, then it gives you the ability to move, or you can move, say with a charge, and call the cleave.

After reading the discussion here, I really believe that is what they meant to have happen.

Now what about Vital Strike? It could be the initial cleave attack, correct?

The power gamer in my says Cleave or Great Cleave is mathematically superior, to full attacking, but not as dynamic. You can pick any target in range with the full attack, they have to be adjacent for cleave.

I just read on channel energy and it no longer turns undead. Why would the most basic cleric ability be taken away. It was great in the Beta Pathfinder. What happened?