Rob80's page

That's different: interrupting a spell has a specific paragraph in the rules... That can even suggest that this rapresents an EXCEPTION to the standard rules: specific ovverides generic.

I reapeat: a 10-year child can kill a dire wolf with no scratch and a pen.

You cannot have 100% to dogde and attack. You cannot have 100% to dodge a charge, matadors can do that with years of training.

If any readied creature has 100% to dodge an attack or a charge from any other creatures, no matter who are the actors, well, this rule is a nonsense.

So I repeat: if there is room for interpretation you should use that room to make things right.

To people thinking that the character whose action was readied against can now choose to do a different action, that's not how it works: A caster can't decide to do something else just because somebody readied an action against their spell, the readied action INTERRUPTS it's target action before that target action completes, but that target action already has been initiated, and it already had to have it's initial parameters declared (for full attacks, subsequent iteratives are independently targetted after resolving the first one).