Philousk |
Assuming that the game's creation is still in ebullition by sometimes borrowing extreme paths of design that a normal group of players could easily hate just to test certain limits, the alpha question for me is: This has been it really worth the trouble to base the game on a public issue rather than build the architecture internally?
I feel that not by noticing the atmosphere of negativity that reigns everywhere in the forum. I even wonder if Paizo would not have been too avarcious, because yes, the purpose of this large-scale survey allowed them to probe a lot of people, but it also allowed them to bail out their treasure chest. Because, let's face it, this also gave them the opportunity to sell the playtest books when these same rules or barely changed will be resold to us a year later or at the end of the playtest ...
Did not this translate into the symbolism of the double-edged knife that is just too sharp?
When the weeds begin to spread in the garden (innumerable complaints from the testers about the design of the game), it is laborious to give back to the earth all its vitality of yore.
Regardless of the pitfalls along the way, I wish PF2e that their fallow garden becomes, despite everything, a beautiful rose garden at the end ......
My apologies for my mediocre English.