Alurad Sorizan

Opus Magus's page

10 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 2 aliases.


RSS


So, in one encounter he performed less than optimally. Even if it was by choice out of ignorance or understanding and desire, it was just the once, right? Until the situation reoccurs I would give him the benefit of doubt and assume he recognized the situation after the fact at least, then allow him the opportunity to make up for it in future encounters before asking for a verdict.


Maybe make it Illusion (Shadow) with a will save to disbelieve? Or maybe a partial negation.


Unfortunately something has occurred that has been requiring my attention and I don't think I'm going to have many opportunities to post, so before I potentially create inconsistencies within this campaign I am going to have to withdraw myself from it. I apologize and hope you guys enjoy yourselves. c:


5d6 ⇒ (5, 5, 3, 5, 6) = 24 x10gp = ranger monies


Base Change Racial Final

14 + 4 + 2 = 20
14 + 0 + 0 = 14
18 + 0 + 0 = 18
14 + 0 + 0 = 14
13 + 0 + 0 = 13
13 - 4 + 0 = 9

I've decided to run a half-orc TWF ranger. If the DM has a suggestion I will run the Urban Ranger archetype or Trapper archetype, if traps are going to be a big deal and depending on how urban or wild friendly the campaign may be. Though, if that seems too prying I understand. I just want to help fill in party needs if I can.

I'm thinking my character could have been formally trained at a military academy or by a renowned weapon master. I'm still working it over in my head.

I will work on my character's back story and come up with his name tonight and hopefully have everything fleshed out tomorrow, perhaps with a few chunks posted later tonight.


I'm wanting to create a martial two-weapon fighting character, though I'm not certain of the role I should fill yet.

I will, however, be avoiding feats/options that tie me to specific weapons as I want the character to be able to enjoy utilizing loot.


xD

I was debating whether or not to apologize for my 38 point buy before or after somebody said something.

I do apologize, though!


14
14
18
14
13
13

Sorry about the format, I didn't know doing all the rolls together would come out such a tangled mess.


4d6 ⇒ (5, 5, 4, 2) = 164d6 ⇒ (2, 4, 6, 4) = 164d6 ⇒ (6, 6, 6, 5) = 234d6 ⇒ (2, 2, 3, 1) = 84d6 ⇒ (4, 2, 1, 2) = 94d6 ⇒ (5, 4, 4, 5) = 184d6 ⇒ (5, 6, 2, 1) = 144d6 ⇒ (6, 4, 2, 3) = 15


I am quite interested.