Oak_Staff's page

I think I'll end up with the Elven Curve blade, while the Fauchard is a great weapon, I've just finished a level 7 - 13 campaign playing a Fauchard wielding Fighter.
I had not though of using an archer, and while I'll definitely save your idea in the Character's-I'll-Hopefully-get-to-play-one-day folder, it's not quite what I'm aiming for with this one.

It won't let me reply directly, it might because my internet or pc is slow :(

Currently making a melee tag team Summoner & Eidolon.

I'm split between the Greatsword, the Elven curve blade, the Flambard and the Falchion.

Feat wise it dosen't matter, all of them will cost me a feat, as i have nothing but simple weapon prof. The only difference is that the Elven curve blade and the Falchion would give me an additional language.

Statline is: 16,14,13,12,10,16

1) don't make them

2) its cheasy

3) don't make them because it's cheasy

4) see point 1.

I dosen't matter if it's cheasy. Though you are implying that it is possible ;)

Val'bryn2 wrote:

They stated a Continuous True Strike weapon in 3.5 edition. It cost 200,000 gp, if I recall correctly.

No sane GM would allow one for 5400, though it would actually be 1800, because you don't have to match the caster level for the feat, just to be able to cast it.

You only look at that table as a last resort. You first price it by similar items, which would be far, far, far more than you propose.

400,000 actually. This is one of those items that can be abused very easily.

I'm not that interested in the continuously true strike ability, as I don't even think it's possible in pathfinder.

- If a continuous item has an effect based on a spell with a duration measured in rounds, multiply the cost by 4. If the duration of the spell is 1 minute/level, multiply the cost by 2, and if the duration is 10 minutes/level, multiply the cost by 1.5. If the spell has a 24-hour duration or greater, divide the cost in half. -

If a spell doesn't have a duration, you can't make it continuous, right?

They stated a Continuous True Strike weapon in 3.5 edition. It cost 200,000 gp, if I recall correctly.

No sane GM would allow one for 5400, though it would actually be 1800, because you don't have to match the caster level for the feat, just to be able to cast it.

You only look at that table as a last resort. You first price it by similar items, which would be far, far, far more than you propose.

But a continuously True Strike ring is not possible to create, is it? It has to have an duration to make it into an continuous effect.

The price is determined by the casters level, as a caster would have to be at least 3rd level to get the feat, the price should be at least 1*3*1800. You cannot, in any way, have a 1st level caster creating wondrous items.

And as we've used the magic pricing table earlier in our campaign, i'll go with the listed pricing there.

I have 4 questions about true strike magic items.

1. True strike does not have a duration, does that not mean that it's impossible to create a continuously effect item with true strike.

2. Could you create it using the command word effect?

3. How long does i take to speak a command word (1 standart action if i remember correctly)

4. Would the price of a true strike command word item not be 5400?
( 1 level * 3rd level caster (craft feat requires 3rd level) * 1800)

Thanks in advance