| Nighthawwk |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
The way the 2nd restatement uses "the enemy must succeed at the Athletics check" shows that there is only 1 check that the ability can prompt. An Athletics check to Force Open.
While this does mean any foe must pass the Force Open check to move or Stand, they can still do other things, like Strike, cast spells, etc.
And yes, Force Open is it's own 1A thing, and does not have a 2nd action included in that check. It's somewhat like Sickened and Retching in that way, the entire action is a fail-able chance to remove the imposed penalty.
And yes, the interaction with the attack trait means that this action-tax is pretty nasty for a lot of foes, needing to pick between attacking someone or escaping the restraint with their fresh MAP 0 action.
.
Do note that this does have 2 main downsides, that the foe must be Prone first, and that you need to leave your Ikon upon the foe and cannot use it while it's holding them down.
.
What is kinda wild, and what I totally forgot before re-reading it now, is that Force Open has a -2 penalty baked in to all attempts.
Quote:Using your body, a lever, or some other tool, you attempt to forcefully open a door, window, container or heavy gate. With a high enough result, you can even smash through walls. Without a crowbar, prying something open takes a –2 item penalty to the Athletics check to Force Open.So, uh, I think RaW this penalty should be there due to Force Open being specifically invoked like that.
There's no text to indicate you skip the -2 for the feat, and it could have been written to use any other invocation of Athletics that was not Force Open.
Do you think that the -2 penalty would apply here? The -2 penalty is stated for prying something open. Example, of when it says with a high enough check you can smash through a wall. I don't think a crowbar is helping you smash through that wall. The check is to move the object not actually pry open the object.