| MinMaxer |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
First, thank you, Isabella, for the awesome work you’ve done. I’m a big fan of the classes/archetype/feats you’ve created. I appreciate your perspective on authorial intent.
If you don't have the prereq, you can't use the feat, absent a special ability overriding this.
I agree with the consensus view that prerequisites apply unless explicitly stated by the ability. I could’ve sworn I found another class or archetype that allowed you to share feats but did not specify that allies did not need to meet the prerequisites, but now I can’t seem to find any. Am I missing something?
If Sisterhood Style is the anomaly, I think that it deserves an errata for consistency, if nothing else. The feats themselves lose a lot of their punch since most teamwork feats carry prerequisites. I could see an argument that the style is meant to be taken by the Gray Maidens alone, therefore they all share similar training, but then why bother sharing feats at all? Besides, Isabella has already said the intent was to ignore prerequisites.
Had I been able to find another example of an ability that shared feats but not granted the ability to bypass prereqs, I would have suggested breaking those two abilities into distinct features that are granted at different levels. For example, you can share any teamwork feats you know at a lower level, but only after a certain, higher level could you share feats with prerequisites and allow the allies to ignore those prerequisites.