Marduk_01's page

I don't mean to nitpick, but isn't that a top 9?

That's some bad luck. I'm sorry you lost him, I really like Sajan.

Maybe for your next adventure you could take two characters (or event three). The game isn't really intended to be played by a single character, wastes too many potential. Some classes have powers just to help other characters (Harsk, Lem, Valeros, Amiri, and lots of characters from class decks).

That's such an elegant fix.

Thanks for all the effort so we can have our fun! XD

Sorry for necroing the thread, but what about now, with S&S and class deck cards?

There is one card in particular that I found super powerful: Ivory Dice. 50% chance to succeed at a check even if you're rolling a d4 against any difficulty is just mind blowing.

But they wouldn't be in the same location anymore in that case.

Thanks for the welcome.

Well, I agree that it makes sense to treat Sajan differently, because he gets a recharge attempt instead of an automatic recharge.

But my doubt is regarding the ruling. So, according to the the ruling, you have to do the first action first. Potions wise, banishing. However, Sajan gets a recharge attempt instead of banishing.

If one combined the description of Sajan's power with, say, a Potion of Healing, it could be read as "(...)succeed at a Fortitude 6 check to recharge this card instead of banishing it and choose a character at your location to shuffle...".

I realize this is not a common wording for a boon, we see it mostly on banes, when they have special effects pre-encounter. Anyway, I think this conclusion is a possible one.

Again, I agree this is much more straight forward with Damiel. Simply read "banish" as "recharge" and it's done.

Hello guys, this is my first post here.

Does this solve the Sajan Drunken Master and Damiel issue?

Because most potions (if not all) say "banish this card to..."; so, replacing the "banish" with "recharge" for Damiel or "recharge attempt" for Sajan would mean they recharge the potion before activating its power.