Kyrrion's page

The paladin rummages through the dragon's hoard, but instead of filling his pocket he appears to be searching for a particular object. Grunts of his frustration can be heard by the members of his adventuring party, prompting the wizard to approach the holy warrior with concern. Normally the paladin would be cheerfully boasting about the group's latest accomplishment, he wasn't one to prioritize material possessions.

Wizard: What precisely are you searching for?

The paladin lets out a long sigh and turns to the wizard.

Paladin: I'm searching for the dragon's will, have you seen it? Now that we have slain it for its foul deeds, it's only proper procedure for us to find and execute his last will!

The wizard stops in his tracks and gives the paladin a blank look, then shuffles away without saying a word.

Now the real question is whether the paladin is searching for the dragon's will due to his dumped Wisdom or the strict and literal adherence to his alignment. Either way, searching for the last will and testament of a dragon, let alone the common bandit, seems ridiculous.

maybe come up with a different name like 'AM STATUS EFFECT' or something?

Given the array of status effects given, I think the "Nutcracker Kick" or the "Johnny Cage Special" would be more appropriate. I'm definitely feeling a "hit to the groin" vibe from this.

Proclaim a manly 1 on 1 bare knuckle boxing duel with a ruffian that has soiled the honor of you, your family, or you friends (or provoke said duel by becoming a ruffian who had soiled the honor of another, their family, or their friends), that is to take place on a worn down rickety 3 foot wide rope bridge that precariously hangs over an active volcano or other large precipice of which a fall would inevitably lead to either party's demise (bonus points if the valley is full of pointy stalagmites), then duke it out shirtless because if your body isn't a perfectly sculpted statue of muscle you're not manly enough.

I don't think you can go wrong with bare knuckle boxing.

Shadow Knight 12 wrote:

Skreeeeeeeeee wrote:

Similarly, anytime a chaotic character follows the laws, they should risk shifting to neutral/lawful alignments. Paid for your meal? Lawful. Didn't murder the maid who looked at you funny? Lawful. Wore clothes, thus following public indecency laws? Oh boy, you can bet that's a lawful act.

Chaotic is not Evil. Murder is an evil act, not a chaotic one. "There's a law against this" doesn't automatically make that thing chaotic when committed.

This a thread for the absurd and the stupid, it totally counts.

Antipaladin falls because he looked both ways before crossing the street.

Chaotic alignment has now been replaced with the YOLO alignment.

I am still curious of the intent behind this change.

Intuitive ruling.

I seriously thought this was the way it was supposed to work prior to reading the FAQ. It never made sense to me that having an SLA (which doesn't even really count as a spell to begin with since you don't need any of the components) would put you on the same level as someone with X-level spellcasting.

Yes, using the feat you prepare the spell with it ahead of time, if you are a caster that prepare spells. So, for example, a Magic Missile using the Silent Metamagic feat, would be a Silent Magic Missile and would be placed in a second level slot.

Rods you use as you cast the spell, so if you had a rod of Lesser Silent Metamagic, you could cast any of your 1st through 3rd level spells as a Silent spell, but only 3 spells/day.

And as a reminder to add more to the post above, you do not need the matching metamagic feat to use a metamagic rod or a metamagic rod to use the matching metamagic feat.

You can use both of them for one spell, as they are independent from each other.

135. They rarely, if ever, actually take the time to eat. They merely absorb food in their backpack via osmosis when their bodies need nourishment.

The lance should be treated as two-handed weapon when dismounted, regardless of Spinning Lance. You might treat the butt end as a club, but you have to have the lance equipped to actually gain access to use the end as a club. You can't just equip and wield "half" of the lance.

Since you do have a two-handed weapon equipped and are wielding it, Shield of Strikes should work regardless if you attack with the butt end or not.

That's the way I see it working - it utterly does not make sense to me to be able to wield the butt end as a one-handed club weapon with a shield. The other side of the lance with the main head of the weapon would be a very clumsy counterbalance to a weapon that doesn't have a counter balance.

Mikaze wrote:

That does it, I'm taking on a self-imposed challenge to write a female monk vs. succubus fight scene tonight while staying on the high ground and have the succubus entirely in character and make it classy.

Ok, where I can find this?

I don't think such a feat could be successfully undertaken by anyone.

I don't think even M. Night Shyamalan could write such a plot twist to make an encounter with a succubus classy.