Malachi, Ciretose has stated he disagrees with Shallowsoul about a chaotic person being capable of holding a personal code. Ciretose is not the one who has claimed it is impossible for a chaotic person to hold to principle. Also where have you found Ciretose declaring himself as lawful neutral? You keep stating that and I've not seen it.
Malachi Silverclaw wrote:
Chaotic people do in fact have the option of going along with laws they find reasonable but when they are in conflict with some aspect it is likely they will ignore it or rebel against it if they are sufficiently motivated by something they see as an unjust restriction. I agree with Deadmoon's description of this disagreement as being one between minute variance in people's interpretations. In my experience when it gets to this elemental level it is hard to get either side to back down.
I'm not thinking of a normal PC, well technically a stand in for a PC and someone who has been played. This is how Merisiel actually behaves. This is an iconic example of a chaotic neutral character in Pathfinder, if perhaps one influenced strongly by her friends of other alignments. She does not betray friends. She chooses at times to obey rules that do not discomfit her, yet she is also an unrepentant thief for her own gain and will stab people she thinks are mean or jerks. A chaotic person can and will choose to do things that benefit others for the sake of themselves. They follow their hearts and minds, and don't necessarily act chaotically simply for the sake of chaos.
Even chaotic neutral people can have a set of lines they will not cross. They can refuse to betray a friend or stab people they feel do not deserve it. They can choose to obey laws that don't seem stupid to them. Chaotic people are not proteans. They're mortals and therefore the average person of chaotic alignment isn't going to be totally random, or totally unpredictable. A code need not be a formal written document, it can be as simple as unwritten or perhaps unspoken law.
Did the froghemoth win or did the dinosaur? The frog thing definitely has the dinosaur in what looks like a deathgrip, but the dinosaur has taken some nasty chunks out. From the position of the head it would be easy for the froghemoth to lose the eyestalk. Also while Valeros appears to not be having a good day at all in that picture would you have preferred to be the one in that Kyra hug?
I got the sense from reading certain that some people were misrepresenting the possible spectrum of chaotic action. If no one has actually presented that position then I will stop discussing it. I agree that a chaotic person isn't necessarily going to sit still for discipline to be enforced upon them by others if they think they know better, or that the law is stupid.
ciretose wrote:
That still doesn't mean every position they take is going to be unpredictable. Only a protean is that evershifting. As well, if you have a code and live by it, aren't you therefore following your code?
I believe the crux of this argument is that there are those claiming that one can hold personal beliefs that border on a personal law. For example, I will point to Merisiel, who hates the thought of betraying a friend and would throw all her knives to a rust monster rather than do so. Chaotic people can still hold principles, still possess lines they will not cross, even if they are not of Good alignment.
Can you appreciate the armor piercing potential of an estoc even if it is a longsword shaped thing probably more fitting for someone like Valeros, being that it is an ancestor of the delightful trophy you wield? Having read about what happened in the Crypt of the Everflame, is there anything around I could look to in terms of later adventures that isn't the comic or something such as that?
Merisiel Sillvari wrote:
I know you liked salty over sweet, but do you prefer salty or spicy flavors? What percentage of your magnificent collection of stabbery and amazement was or is gifted by a friend, if any, or do you accept knives from friends? |