Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
There's a big difference between 'teaching' situations with consumables in 1-4's and that sort of thing in a 5-8 for example. You want new players to learn that things exist and consumables can/should be considered in budgeting. By level 6 tho, you're 15-20 scenarios in and should have learned what to do and what not to do and shouldn't be expecting convenient consumables.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Darius Alazario wrote:
The magus just says: You choose these from the common spells on the arcane spell list or from other arcane spells you gain access to. The summoner says the same thing: You choose these from the common spells from the tradition corresponding to your eidolon, or from other spells from that tradition to which you have access. Oracle and Witch in the APG are similar. The restriction is Common Spells. That text combined with the transitive chain of access/commonality regarding Cleric/Druid STRONGLY suggests that the interpretation we have now regarding paying to Learn A Spell for Common Divine spells with Divine Casters is the wrong interpretation. We now have a second non-CRB sourcebook with Common classes that have access to Common spells across all books. For CRB classes to be treated differently is nonsense.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
TOZ wrote:
Easy! In the first case, the museum would've been better off without him in charge. In the second case, the museum would be far worse off if he wasn't in charge. Or was it the other way around?
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
This strikes me as an offhanded comment by someone who didn't understand the context of the question. And it /still/ doesn't answer the disparity between CRB classes and APG (and presumably future classes in other books). The Witch and Oracle have no such limitations on having to buy access to Common spells in the APG. It makes no sense that CRB classes would have that limitation on Common spells. They're common for a reason.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Mike Bramnik wrote:
I take a slightly different view. Bolded for emphasis. You'd have access to the spells in the APG because their rarity is Common. Nothing changes in this regard, though the sentence can certainly be read in a more restrictive way. |