Javier Rivera's page

If I'm reading the note correctly, if I buy the pdf first and then this module it will cost me 40$, if I do it the other way it will be just 30$.

Does this make sense? This didn't happen for the other Foundry modules.

I disagree...

Even if Nualia had used her ability for another two rounds, she wouldn't TPK us. She would probably drop the Paladin, but all the other characters finish the combat with plenty hit points (even the other fighter at front line). The paladin was near dead, but the party, as a whole was far from defeat.

It has the same problem that all the area attacks, you need to "forget" the character laying in negative hit points, or you risk killing them.

Note that we also made some tactical mistakes, I didn't realised that "remove fear" was a range power until later in the combat. If I did, I could cast it on the bard, and she would be able to join the battle. Not only would this help to defeat Nualia, but also make the combat more enjoyable to her (the bard not Nualia ;).

I really believe that you could have pressed us a little bit more without killing the party.

But yes, I need to take that feat ASAP, it's a must-have for a cleric.

BTW, I was Averin the cleric, who probably needs to check the use of conditionals sentences in English.

The PCGen team is working on supporting Pathfinder RPG as good as possible.

These are great news. If there is some way that we can help, please don't hesitate to post it here.

Thank you very much.

Javier.

I'm interested in both PCGen and Maptools. We are using maptools to play "Rise of the Runelords" over the net. But I believe that maptools stuff (like characters and monster chips and maps) are more related to adventures than core books.

If Pathfinder is all OGL, us (the community) can make our own data sets. Maybe, asking for help and infrastructure (hosting, forums...) is wiser that asking Paizo to make more free content by their own.

Finally, I have no interested at all on Windows only software. Caming from the dark side of Linux here...

I believe that it would be a great idea to create a forum for playtest data. Not house-rules, rules suggestions or rule discussion. But real data and feeling from playtest games.

It's now quite difficult to find (the little bit) playtest data in this forums. It could be easier for the designer(s) too.

It could also make it easier to more people to share their experiences. After all this is a community playtest, not a community design ;).

Javier.

2. Named Bonuses
- Rather than the she-bang of Enhancement/Magic/Luck/Morale/Sacred/Deflection/Competence/Whatever crap;
- reduce it to just, say, Competence/Magic/Luck. Reclassify everything into those categories. Allows less things to stack, which is good IMO as it allows for better balancing.

I will spend my first post in this forums just to say:

"YES PLEASE".

This is a big needed simplification, alleviates the Christmas tree problem, is easy backwards compatible and tones down the power level (that way we can up it again with class and races features).

Javier.