Got my PDF. I know nobody asked, but Dead Weight got a massive improvement. It now has the Thrall move up to 15 feat, is a fortitude save that destroys the thrall, but on a success they are Off-Guard, on failure they are Slowed 1 & Off-Guard, on a Crit Failure they are Slowed 2 & Off-Guard.
Even then I don't think its the right name. Magi aren't just mages they're also hitting you over the head with something.I'm also not a massive fan of Magus as a name because it's an IRL term for priests in Zoroastrianism that don't really have much to do with the spellsword angle.It's also just an IRL fancy synonym for mage. I mean, you may not like it, but the term has been in use for a spellsword type for many years now. Sure, Pathfinder 1 & 2 have used it, but also things like Chrono Trigger, Supreme Magus, Shadowrun Returns, Fate, The Irregular at Magic High School, That Time I got Reincarnated as a Slime, Adam Warlock and the Magus, etc. just to name a few. All of these modern usages (modern being a stretch because some of these examples are from the late 90s...damn I'm old) refer to this person or role as a blend of magical and physical. Words change over time based on mainstream usage, especially when dealing with fantasy settings.
As to the Runesmith preview and lack of discussion overall I think the article was poorly done. It was posted on a site with oppressive and aggressive ads, making it hard to read. They talked briefly about it being changed from the playtest, but gave no recap or summary of the playtest and how it relates to the current version. It just sort of dumped a ton of information, but didn't contexualize or comment on much of it. Over all, it was a hard read and felt like it was written by somebody who was simply told to do it rather than by somebody who was actually interested in the class or even the game. The other previews we've had so far were more enthusiastic and informative to the audience rather than just a data dump style.
Im not Paizo and I'm not in the books business so I could be wrong, but being a ttrpg player and having been in ttrpgs for over 20 years, I am 80% sure if you made a book called "oops all feats" and just stuck in a bunch of feats for all the existing classes and races it would sell really well.I think the system is ready for an occult focused book that really plays up the weird and can have the space necessary to fix the psychic along side getting 2 new classes. Obviously not and to even think that would be an option is crazy to me. Of course, like existing books, it would need a theme, more content, spells, items, and a narrative. All I'm saying is that the page space currently devoted to new classes would be devoted, instead, to an expansion of the existing classes. Think similar to many expansions or DLCs to games. Guild Wars 2 (one of the most popular MMOs on the market) don't add new classes with every expansion. Instead they add class expansions that equate to new sub-classes or class archetypes and skills (feats) to existing classes. This, is a primary driver of excitement and sales. It all comes down to presentation, marketing, and quality of content. A book of "oops all feats" as you put it would obviously flop and would signal to me that Paizo gave up trying. However, a book of heroes finding new ways to defeat the ever present and growing dangers, or a book of ancient knowledge uncovered, or a book of cosmic exploration into various planes where the natives have different approaches to what it means to be a [insert existing class], should be one to grab the attention of a similar audience base who buys the new books today.
I think the system is ready for an occult focused book that really plays up the weird and can have the space necessary to fix the psychic along side getting 2 new classes. Yes, this! I really want to go at least a year or two of no new classes. Instead having a book that focusses on expanding out Class Archetypes for each and every class. Then add more feats for each class. Rework a few things that need it *cough* Inventor *cough* Ancestries are another thing I'd love to see get expanded with a similar treatment. Then, more general archetypes are fine with me too. I think there is enough content to fill a regular sized rulebook with these things and then some. As for demand, I believe if it was advertised as adding more Class Archetypes and/or sub-classes people would still be very interested. I know my tables would flock to this sort of thing.
Well, I was wrong. RIP wave casting I guess. F@%#. That's true, the real buff is to Summoner. Unlike Magus, they didn't get the extra spell slots to work with built in (could take Fey Eidolon to get more at physical cost, or take a feat for an extra summoning spell, but tjat was about it). I feel good for them.
This is from my post on the new Blog that Paizo dropped. In the encounter we see a number of abilities used, but the one that really caught my interest is the lore on how Thrall creation works. Seems that the thralls are simulacra rather than the actual raising of the person. He's still using necromantic energy and he is using the actual remains of the person to draw the power, but he's using it to create a copy of them as a thrall. To me, this is a major distinction. Even in the story it implies that he calls the same people (or rather copies them) for each specific task over and over. Frankly, I'm a big fan of this approach to the lore.
The lore on how Thrall creation works is interesting to me here. Seems that the thralls are simulacra rather than the actual raising of the person. He's still using necromantic energy and he is using the actual remains of the person, but he's using it to create a copy of them as a thrall. To me, this is a major distinction. Even in the story it implies that he calls the same people (or rather copies them) for each specific task over and over. Frankly, I'm a big fan of this approach to the lore.
Getting back on the topics of mechanics of the Necromancer and its hype, I just came across a small post by Know Direction with another awesome tidbit. Seems there is a 6th level feat that gives Necromancer an extra spell slot, always at your highest rank, that can only be used for Summon Undead. Apparently it does something else too, but they said they had an article next week that will cover it in more detail. Whatever else it does is bonus to me. An extra spell to summon undead at highest rank...yes to more to add to my growing horde! I'm going to find it likely hard to pass up, but man all the feats I've seen so far are between good and phenomenal. No duds so far, so can't wait to see what else is coming!
A post I made in another thread reminded me of a character concept from my old D&D 3.x day I plan to recreate with the Necromancer. For those who remember the 3.x prestige class, the Malconvoker, you should see where I'm going (just with undead rather than demons/devils). He knows how much of the world views undead and the Necromancers that make them. Pure evil, or at best vile. And sure, most of the undead he's encountered and even creates are less than benevolent. But he leans into that. He's learned to create undead, both mindless and with their own will, and use their destructive and vile nature to do good. The mindless ones are easy to manipulate, just be sure to point them at the greater evil and let them do what comes naturally. The ones with a will of their own require a masterful tongue to convince them that their goals and his align. While more difficult to control than the mindless ones, the payoff is that much greater and ultimately the greater good they can reap. He knows he will be reviled for his methods, but that is OK by him. His reward is in the deeds he does, and in the satisfaction of bending these repulsive creatures to his will and leave the world a better place for it. Of course, once the task is done, he is sure to clean up his mess by destroying the foul creatures he tricked into doing a good deed.
I seem to remember reading when the undead PC options were released that the nature of the negative (void) energy that sustained them was a constant corrupting force. That some rare undead are able to stave off the corrupting affects through willpower or exceptional purpose or force of their personality at least for a time, years, sometimes even centuries, but that it was an inevitability that they would eventually be fully corrupted by it. Frankly, I liked this description. I also like that it came from an in-world source so there could always be wiggle room. As for the other part of this discussion, I think it is fair that some people in the world would react poorly based on the region. Obviously a necromancer in my Iruxi or Kholo societies wouldn't get a second look. Even more pragmatic or power based human societies would be ok with it. Those who are closer to Pharasma or who are not exposed to it much would find it revolting. And that's ok to me, makes the world seem more real rather than accommodating to how we, as players, feel. As to me personally, I can definitely see myself playing a more "good" Necromancer. Either because they come from a culture that doesn't view it as evil, or by using it as a means to an end in a pragmatic way. For example, one of my favorite D&D 3.x classes was the Malconvoker. They specifically had to be good aligned, but their schtick was that they summoned demons and devils to fight their enemies. Forcing evil beings to work for the greater good.
I agree with everything you list, but feel I have to add one thing. They need to make Tandem Movement a class feature rather than a feat. Summoner plays so much smoother with it, and the feat is so good that it makes it almost mandatory for nearly any build. Aside from that, my hopes are simple. The feats that give the eidolon monster abilities (grab, knockdown, etc.) got nerfed in the remaster due to how those abilities were changed. Hope they do something to compensate for that. Also, would love a proper and balanced Synthesis feat tree and/or Eidolon built around the Synthesis idea.
Couldn't agree more. I came here hoping for Necromancer, Runesmith, or other new content speculation and discussion, and what I found was just more the the exact same Magus/Psychic discussion that has dominated so many other threads. Given how big of a discussion topic it seems to be, I agree that it was probably too much (or people just theory crafting and like to complain about theoretical). I GMed a Magus for 11 levels and they never used Psychic archetype and also never felt underpowered. Sure, they were feast or famine type, but they never seemed to lack in power between spellslots and Gouging Claw.
I'm well aware I may be flamed for this post, but I'm going to post this anyway. I miss the playtests with Dev. interactions. It has become less with more recent playtests and while I get it, they want unbiased and raw feedback, the lack of any dev. interaction on this playtest has been deafeningly silent. I miss the playtests where a dev. would occasionally pop into the forums and make a clarification on a poorly written feature or feat, or an acknowledgement of an unintended interaction, a question to induce conversation, or even a "thank you" and quick comment about some feedback. All of these things made the playtests feel interactive and important to Paizo. The playtest going on now, with lack of any seeming interest by the dev. team just seems bland, even though it is with some extremely exciting classes and mechanics. I don't know, I just miss playtests like we had with the Summoner/Magus where it was obvious that the Paizo team was following it with great attention and fervor. Where it was clear they were proud of their creation and genuinely wanted to hear the feedback from the playtesters. All that said, I'm sure they are taking all of our feedback and will do great things, I just can't shake how this one feels different is all. Heck, we are a month in and they still haven't even said boo on what makes it an "Impossible" playtest, not even teasingly.
I can totally understand why people who want the occult spell list are voicing their opinions, but why would anyone try to shut down others from having the option to choose between the two lists? If you don't like divine spells, then just choose to play occult. You're right. While on the topic, I think my Fighter should have the choice to trade weapon expertise for Sneak Attack. Rage, or Exploit Vulnerability. Don't limit my choices!
Thos is exactly what ive seen in my actual play playtests. Pre-Level 7, the class is clunky and a little painful at times. Level 7 and beyond, it feels smooth and interesting. I REALLY hope they adjust this in the final. I've seen nothing in my level 3 (as a player) or 5 playtests (as a GM and posted here with play-by-play) that suggest 2 thralls at that level de-balances anything.
My two cents then I'll leave. I respectfully disagree. Occult works with Necromancer theme and has most of what the Necromancer would want as has been thoroughly discussed and debated in another thread (frankly to an exhausting level). The gaps we see in the Necromancer's toolkit, I thoroughly believe, will be filled in the book that Necromancer comes out in by no doubt adding additional on theme spells. My breakdown:
Primal: Nothing to do with Necromancy as a rule Arcane: possibly, but it is more of a wide tradition and at a personal level I think Occult simply jives with the Necromancer theme better
Unfortunately there are a lot of undead it won't work on though. Many are immune to Mental abilities and Soothe has the Mental trait. Thos includes Thralls (so no healing the special thralls with Soothe).Soothe having the mental trait is one of those things that makes the occult list feel like a poor fit thematically While I agree that Soothe isn't a great fit, I actually like the Occult list for Necromancer. I have no doubt that the book in which Necromancer is released will have plenty of new and on-theme Occult spells to add to the spooky and necromancy utility and undead feel.
It might have Soothe since it can heal Undead and living creatures.They wouldn't and shouldn't. Heal is necromancy, soothe isn't. My take has been that the necromancer should be divine. No toes are being stepped on, necromancy is power over life and death and divine does it the best Unfortunately there are a lot of undead it won't work on though. Many are immune to Mental abilities and Soothe has the Mental trait. Thos includes Thralls (so no healing the special thralls with Soothe).
Thanks for the feedback! I don't wanna only hone in on a small part of what you said, but IIRC isn't the Summon Thrall attack optional? You can create a Thrall, choose not to attack, then two action spell attack at no MAP right?Yes, it's optional, and the best option if you want to use a spell with a spell attack. But it's obvious that you're giving up the possibility of dealing this extra damage, even if it's not that great. I think that incentivizes the use of spells with a save. 100% this! Not attacking with your thrall so you can do an attack spell, basically negates part of the reason to summon the thrall. It basically makes your focus spell simply a 3 action spell, and as they are, they aren't worth three actions on their own (granted I know they can still flank, but still...)
with those I can see an issue with Ghost not interacting with MAP like the other two and, if using Demoralize rules, each creature targeted would then be immune for 10 mins I dont see it not interacting with MAP as a problem as Demoralize is a legit 1 action tactics you or anybody can do anyway. Frankly I see it as action compression like so many other actions various classes get (thrall plus demoralize). As to being immune for 10 minutes, that's an issue, but can be approached a few ways. If you rule it is the thrall (not Necromancer) making the Demoralize attempt, then a new thrall could do it just fine. This may be a bit too powerful though. If you rule it is the Necromancer making the Demoralize, then they would be immune, though it is similar to the Braggart Swashbucker and their Intimidation to gain Panache.
Here's a thought. Perhaps thralls differ based on the type summoned and thus feel more mechanically useful and varied. When you create thrall you get the initial choice of: Skeleton - attacks when summoned
All would use your SA modifier and all would then be treated exactly the same after the initial roll. All of these things are things any PC can do from lvl 1 so I don't see it as OP, but it would make for some cool variety and make my thralls feel special. If thos is too strong by some accounts, perhaps that is based on the initial Grim Facination you choose and then there are level 1 feats you can get to add the other choices.
100% agree. That said, I wouldn't say no to a level 8 feat or lvl 9 class feature that let thralls hover in place in the air.
To me it comes down to a Recall Knowledge check. They can do Recall Knowledge about you (the Necromancer) to understand what thralls are and the likelihood that what you summon is one. Or they can Recall Knowledge on the thrall which will have a DC by level of 13 (lvl -1) to identify it. If an enemy did this, as a GM I would probably let them do a Recall Knowledge against one of them and then be able to recognize any other thrall as a thrall (as no matter how hard you try, they won't look exactly like another undead) given they know what they are about now.
The prevalence of Necrotic Bomb use is a bit…narratively underwhelming. I guess, when mapped to an RPG being a Necromancer, turning your undead minions into exploding void-stuff makes sense, but it definitely feels very video-gamey. And much more akin to an Alchemist lobbing a different kind of bomb. Creat your thrall, have them attack and then…at the end of your turn…when well positioned between a bunch of enemies…blammo. And…repeat. I agree with most of that, though I think I am fine with the fantasy of blowing up my minions. That said, you are spot-on with the prevalence of Necrotic Bomb and my players definitely felt this. In this playthrough Fleshy's player definitely felt more powerful than Bony's player did. Bony Barrage had its moment, but still felt like he was missing out on the big trigger of Necrotic Bomb. And to be clear, I think other, more interesting options needs to be brought up to Necrotic Bomb level rather than Necrotic Bomb taken down. Even with that option, the damage output was at around un-optimized Kineticist level and without it the damage was below even that. One piece we talked about was how the Living Graveyard was really cool, but not level 20 cool. More options like that toned to be throughout the leveling career would be neat to have. I mean heck, most of our games spends most of it's time at levels 4-8 and we want fun variety there too.
I posted this in a similar thread, but will put here too for relevance This came up in my playtest game Actual Play Scenario - Necromancers - Lvl 5 The players found a trapped door, but didn't have the skill to disable it. Necromancer summoned a thrall, but since the trap triggered on the door opening, all the thrall could do was stand there with it's nose on the door and stare. The players thought it was absolutely stupid that they could make the thrall attack somebody, but couldn't teach it how to simply push on a door.
This came up in my playtest game Actual Play Scenario - Necromancers - Lvl 5 The players found a trapped door, but didn't have the skill to disable it. Necromancer summoned a thrall, but since the trap triggered on the door opening, all the thrall could do was stand there with it's nose on the door and stare. The players thought it was absolutely stupid that they could make the thrall attack somebody, but couldn't teach it how to simply push on a door.
I'm all about the Necromancer being INT and having to study the dead and the balance between life and death. As for the dirge, it is a song often composed for funeral rites. A song doesn't have to be off-the-cuff or done through feeling alone. I think Necromancers more as a composer and some of the best music composers in history have used mathematics and learning to compose their songs (Mozart, Xenakis, Cage, Bach, etc.) In other words, music doesn't have to mean charisma.
Good advice and I agree they should have used their cantrips a bit more on this, though each fight was relatively short, so they wanted to use their big guns. Additionally, their cantrips were SA as well and so would be penalized by MAP (or their thrall would get MAP) as they had Needle Darts and Telekinetic Projectile as their damage ones given the Occult list. Void Warp should have been used though in retrospect.Another interesting alternative if they are playing with humans, elves or gnomes (and any other class that can take primal/arcane cantrips via ancestry feat/heritage) is to take Electric Arc (or similar like Scatter Scree, but let be honest it's hard to overcome the efficiency of EA in this game). It's something that I do basically with every non-arcane/primal casters that I made. Good thought, though we didn't for two reasons. 1) For the playtest we decided to rely as little as possible on specific ancestry or equipment, just trying to stay basic to see the class on its own merits only. 2) Since Necromancer is an INT based class and those things give innate casting, it makes the DCs lower (given all innate casting uses CHA). For one Necromancer this would have only been one lower than their normal DC, but for the other, who dumped CHA, it would have been near useless at being 4 lower of a DC. That said, using a Spellheart would work fine and something we often do, but it was decided against for this game.
Yes, we realized that towards the end of the fight, but my players then felt like the Grave Spell was basically a three action spell and its power level was pretty weak for a three action spell. -Did they get any use out of inevitable return? I don't notice any mention of that reaction. They did when the first squirrel died in the moderate encounter. However it was significant distance away from the second one and so didn't play a factor. It did raise a discussion I forgot to include though. We had two Necromancers who procced that and we assume the thrall raises in the square of the dead enemy. So I just ruled one rose in that square, and the other rose adjacent to it. No thrall was created when the Crawling Hand Swarm was taken down because it was undead and technically they don't die, but are destroyed. Wording in Raw says one won't raise for destroyed undead. -Did the players feel like the class had a lot of options to juggle, in a bad way? I'm curious if they felt like it was too difficult to pick up. Forgetting spells and reactions can indicate they're new to the class, sure, but it could also indicate the class felt cluttered in play or had more options than the players felt was appropriate. Is that some of what they were getting at with the bounded caster comment? Actually they loved the complexity. That was one of their favorite parts. My group is pretty well experienced and get bored with straight forward classes as a rule. The Gunslinger, for example, was getting bored to tears (he figured he'd try it since this was a one shot). Forgetting about the spells was less about inexperience I think, and more about the focus of the class is very much thrall creation, usage, and battlefield placement. They were having fun with that side of it and never felt the need to dip into the handful of spells they prepared. What we were getting at with the Bounded Caster discussion was that the power really didn't seem to be much in the spells or even want to be in the spells. We can't see a Necromancer getting rid of spellcasting as that would feel off, but we thought that it would allow more power budget to be allocated to class features that perhaps did more with thralls and didn't require a focus point (like Consume) and/or ramp up the grave spells power level so that the extra resource cost felt more powerful. It probably also goes to show that one player's favorite class is Magus and my favorite class is Summoner (such a misunderstood class), so bounded casting doesn't feel like a disadvantage, but an interesting play style. They can summon more than one thrall at level 1 by spending more than one action. Yes, they realized this, but felt that it was not very well rewarding at this level in part because the MAP on the second SA roll almost guaranteed a miss and they simply weren't needed for flanking. There was only one Melee character besides the Thralls and so they often had the flanking. Not to mention that the Kineticist had other options besides an attack roll if the thrall wasn't there to flank for whatever reason. Instead just use a normal cantrip/spellslot spell and create a thrall in the first turn. This will allow then to keep the flanking and in the next round you can use the existing thrall to use Bone Spear and then create a new one to repeat the cicle. Good advice and I agree they should have used their cantrips a bit more on this, though each fight was relatively short, so they wanted to use their big guns. Additionally, their cantrips were SA as well and so would be penalized by MAP (or their thrall would get MAP) as they had Needle Darts and Telekinetic Projectile as their damage ones given the Occult list. Void Warp should have been used though in retrospect. Beyond that though, the rounds where they did keep their thralls "alive" they were destroyed before they could be used. The squirrels had AoEs that popped them and the dragon used its -10 MAP frenzy to pop them. It did do a great job of wasting two actions for the Crawling Hand Swarm though. With the second fight specifically, this is again where they felt having more than one thrall without having to spend two full actions (thus no spell or cantrip) would have felt better. That said, they could have used the Aid action or something like shield or guidance, but again, that just didn't fit with what they wanted to do out of the class.
I ran a short scenario to playtest the Necromancer as a few of my players were really interested in how the class played. We played a moderate and a severe encounter. Party Composition:
*Necromancer - Bone Shaper Bone Spear Bone Speaker Bony Barrage *Necromancer - Flesh Magician
*Kineticist - Fire/Earth
*Gunslinger - Sniper
Our nefarious band of fortune seekers have heard of a cave where a horde of precious gemstones could bring them a fortune, so of course they decide to find the danger and ignore the warnings of certain death to obtain it. Besides, two members of the party are intimate "friends" with death itself, so they fear not! Moderate Encounter:
* Two Taldan Cave Squirrels While the Sniper successfully avoids notice, the rest of the party aren't exactly quiet and so shortly after entering the cave one cave squirrel sees them and uses their Defensive Scream to alert his mate who was burrowing for more gemstones to add to their collection. Round 1
Gunslinger (Gun) has no targets in site, but saw the squirrel burrow, so readies an action to attack if an enemy resurfaces Squirrel 2 (S2) pops out of the ground and takes a devastating critical attack from the gunslinger for 34 damage. It then attacks the Flesh Necromancer (Fleshy) and hits. It uses its last action to successfully grab him. Fleshy succeeds at his acrobatics check to escape, moves away, then uses Create Thrall. The attack misses by 3 (due to the MAP). Kin uses Lava Leap to get to S2 who succeeds her Ref. save and takes 4 damage. He ended his leap so as not to hit the thrall and was 10 feet away from the S2. He then renews his aura and throws a blast that misses the S2. Bone Necromancer (Bony) creates a thrall and hits for 8 damage. He then goes to use Bone Spear. However I remind the player it only has a 10ft range, so he decides to get closer and moves within range. Since he doesn't have the actions for bone spear now, he decides to intimidate the squirrel (he has intimidating glare) and succeeds. Round 2 S1 resurfaces and spits at Fleshy dealing 12 damage (Fleshy succeeds his fortitude save). It spits again and hits (because Fleshy is off-guard) for another 11 damage (he again saves his fortitude). Gun reloads and hides, shoots at S2 for 5 damage, then running reloads to get further away. S2 claws Fleshy for a crit and 18 damage. It tries to maintain the grab and fails and then does a Screaming Force for damage in a 30 foot emanation (that doesn't hurt squirrel friends). This is basic save for 11 damage. Fleshy succeeds, Bony Fails, Kin Succeeds, and both thralls pop. Fleshy wants to hurt the squirrel, but also has to be warry of friendly fire. So he creates a thrall 10 feet from the squirrel, which unfortunately can't reach to attack. He then blows it up with Necrotic Bomb. The S2 fails its save and takes 22 damage. Unfortunately this took all his actions (and a focus point) and so he can't move away from S2. Kin moves into flanking with Fleshy and does a 2 action melee blast that hits (because S2 is off-guard) dealing 19 damage. Bony is annoyed his thrall is gone, but really wants to get Bone Spear off so creates another one (but he can't flank due to positioning of Kin and Fleshy). The thrall hits for 10 damage which is enough to kill S2. So, Bony moves close to S1 and creates another thrall, which misses its attack. Round 3
Gun shoots for another big crit doing 45 damage! He then hides/reloads and shoots again (almost critting again, but was 1 off) for 11 damage. Fleshy creates a thrall next to S1 and hits with the attack for 4 damage. He then blows it up for 18 damage (S1 failed its save). Kin lava leaps for 13 damage (S1 makes his save so only takes 6). He then renews his aura and makes a melee blast that misses Bony really wants to use Bone Spear, but realizes that if he creates the thrall in a flanking position he would hit his ally. So he creates the thrall in a non-flanking position. Its attack hits for 8 damage and he then uses Bone Spear which misses due to MAP (missed by 4) Round 4 S1 is in a dire spot and burrows, then runs away, ending combat. Between Combat:
* party heals up by Gun using medicine * both Necromancers refocus * Kineticist makes a fire for them to chill around during this time. * Party continues on their way and come across an old set of large double-doors and inspect it realizing it is trapped. * Unfortunately nobody has any thieves tools (Gun kicks himself for not putting ranks in Thievery) * Bony decides to use a thrall to set off the trap, but after creating it, we realize that it actually can't set off the trap because it can't open the door (no actions and no way to give it a manipulate action to open the door in front of it). After some argument about how dumb that is that it can attack, but can't push on a door, I rule that this is a playtest and we are playing it by RAW. * So, after lengthy discussion they do rock-paper-scissors to decide who opens the door while the others stand back. * Kin loses and opens the door which sets off a trap that sprays gas into his face. * Kin succeeds his Fort save, but is still sickened 1 * Immediately upon opening the door Kin is hit by a large pink set of jaws for 20 damage due to the dragon inside waiting for the doors to open after hearing the bickering and commotion from the other side of the door. Severe Encounter:
* Young Omen Dragon * Crawling Hand Swarm Round 1
Dragon (Pinky) takes a step forward and breaths to catch Kin, Fleshy, and Bony in its breath for 28 damage. Kin crit fails, but uses a Hero Point to reroll that into a regular failure. Fleshy and Bony both fail and so all three are Slowed 1 Bony creates a thrall which misses the dragon, then uses his only other action to go into the large room. That's when he sees a swarm of undead hands writhing in the corner and alerts his party. Fleshy goes into the room in the opposite direction of the creepy hands and uses Reach of the Dead to create a thrall next to the swarm. It attacks and hits, but most of the 9 damage is resisted (he made it slashing) which allowed 4 damage to go through. Crawling Hand Swarm (Handy) moves to encompass the thrall and attacks it, killing it. Fleshy smiles as that is exactly what he was hoping to do (eat up 2 of the swarms actions) and then it moves to encompass Bony, but it doesn't have the actions left to attack. Kin immediately wretches with his first action and then with his only other action moves into the room. Round 2 Gun reloads, shoots at Pinky and hits for 11 damage and then hides/reloads in the rubble Pinky Moves and uses Draconic Frenzy to hit Kin with a wing for 15 damage, hit Bony with a claw for 16 damage, and destroys the thrall with a claw Bony does a recall knowledge on the dragon using Undead Lore (with Bone Speaker) and learns it's worst save is Reflex (which is relayed to the group). This helps as 3 of the players have the ability to target different saves. He then creates moves out of Handy's swarm and uses his last action to create a thrall on the other side of Handy. The attack misses. Fleshy creates a thrall, but ops for positioning over attacking. He creates the thrall between Handy and Pinky in such a way that his Necrotic Bomb can hit them both without hitting Kin or Fleshy. Unfortunately this means it is not within reach to make its attack. He then blows it up for 25 damage. Both fail their reflex saves and since all Necromancers have Mastery of Life and Death, this deals vitality damage to Handy. It also triggers Handy's area damage weakness for a very satisfying turn. Handy has three fairly close targets (Bony, Kin & Thrall), but none spaced to where he can get more than one. So I roll a die to determine where he goes and he goes for Kin. He moves, then does two Pummeling Grasps. The first hits for half damage doing 4 damage and the other hits for full damage doing 9 damage and knocking Kin prone. Kin opts to stay on the ground (gutsy) to activate Thermal Nimbus and then uses Flying Flame which can hit both Handy and Pinky. Pinky succeeds his save taking 8 damage and Handy fails taking 16 damage plus triggering its area weakness. Round 3 Gun no longer has any line of sight on bad guys in the room, so spends two actions to double move into the room and in a corner. He then shoots at the swarm as he sees a lot of the hands are not moving and the swarm is thinning out pretty badly. He hits dealing 11 bludgeoning damage which is enough to kill it despite it's resistance (it only had 2 HP left). Pinky takes 2 damage from Thermal Nimbus and then can't resist the Kin on the ground prone. It attacks with a jaw and crits for 36 damage. It attacks with a Wing and hits for 14 damage. It attacks with a claw and misses and then rolls a Nat. 20 for its last claw attack to finish up Draconic Frenzy and does 38 more damage taking the Kin down to dying 2 Bony decides to creates a thrall next to the dragon whose attack misses and then activates Bony Barrage and Pinky fails the Reflex save taking 12 damage. Fleshy uses Sooth to bring Kin back up on his feet and then creates a thrall next to the dragon. The attack misses Round 4 Gun uses Running Reload to move to a corner with a lot of rubble, then attacks dealing 18 damage and then uses hide/reload. Kin stubbornly stays on the ground and turns his aura back on and activates Thermal Nimbus again. Then uses Flying Flame on Pinky. Pinky succeeds their save and takes 7 damage. Pinky moves and positions itself so it can get the thrall, Bony, and Kin in its breath attack. The thrall is immune so sticks around. Kin fails his save and Bony succeeds. Kin takes 22 damage and goes unconscious (not dying since it is mental damage) and Bony takes 11 damage. Pinky looks disappointed. Bony creates a thrall which hits for 5 damage. Then uses it for Bony Barrage which Pinky succeeds against, but still takes 7 damage which is exactly enough to kill Pinky. With combat over, they get Kin up off the ground and start looting Pinky's hoard! Our Conclusions:
* Overall feel, both players enjoyed the Necromancer class and felt their rounds gave them options to think about and interesting choices. * Both players commented that they almost forgot they had spells though (except the one use of Sooth) which sparked a conversation about how this class could probably due even better as a Bounded Caster which would allow a bit more power in the thralls and Grave spells * Only creating 1 thrall at a time until level 7 is rough on action economy and feels bad in a game that emphasizes tactical movement and spells with the attack trait THIS WAS THE BIGGEST COMPLAINT BY FAR .
* Both Necromancer players were a little disappointed they couldn't get a small horde going because the thralls died either before they could make another and sometimes before they could use them. Going back to the point above, being able to create 2 at lvl 1 doesn't seem broken, but would REALLY help the class feel better. * Bone Spear looks awesome, but that 10ft range is an HUGE downer. 30 Ft range (keeping the line the same size) would be fine. Additionally, as an attack that uses a thrall, if you don't have a thrall already in place from a previous round, the attack is hard to land because of MAP caused by creating the thrall that round. * Necrotic Bomb was very fun to use both mechanically and thematically * Bone Speaker was very cool and did help on the dragon fight to know what save to target. Though most of the table thought it would be nice if this was a built in feature rather than a feat, given it is limited to creatures and some other specifics. * Positioning was always in the forefront of the Necromancer players' minds. * Even for focus spells that required saves, it was often hard to get both the thrall attack and grave spell off effectively. Thralls seem like they want to be flanking buddies, however the abilities that use them often do area damage that would hit their flanking buddy. So more than once the thrall was summoned in a place where it couldn't reach to attack so that the spell wouldn't hit their friend. I don't know how I feel about this, whether it is strategic, or overly punishing. My table was split on the opinions. * Damage output was on par with the Kineticist from what I could tell * We were disappointed that Dead Weight didn't come up for a good time to use it, it seems fun. * Frankly we forgot about the Flesh Magician enhancement that makes destroyed thralls difficult terrain, however in retrospect, I don't think it would have impacted any of the fights. We did remember the Bone Shaper's enhancement, but none of the damage to them required a Reflex save, so it never came up (squirrels called for Fort and Dragon called for Will) * Not being able to use the thralls at all, even for basic RP or menial tasks like opening the door really detracted from the fantasy. This was especially prevalent when they tried to use the thrall to spring the trap and all it could do was stand there with its nose on the door, unable to push it open. CONCLUSION - I really like the Necromancer as a whole, but feel there are some clunky gameplay that needs to be worked out for it to shine. Thralls are very cool and with some tweaks will be great. We all agreed that a lvl 7 Necromancer would play much smoother due to creating multiple thralls, but that waiting for it to come online at level 7 is not great. We had a lot of fun creating and playing this class and I hope this real world example can help mold the class for its future release. I, for one, can't wait to get my hands on a, hopefully, smoother version when it comes out fully fleshed out (pun intended).
For me, getting rid of an unwanted Thrall without the need for a focus point gets me two things. 1) something else interesting to do when I don't have or want to spend a hero point and 2) ensures that if a Thrall is where an ally wants to go, I can be a team player and get rid of the Thrall. I'd love to see an ability built into the class that does something like: 1 action
The place feels deserted os a good way to say it. I thought the same thing when I posted on Monday. In past playtests I felt the Debs were engaging. Sometimes clarifying an oddly worded rule, sometimes weighing in on designer thought process. That's something I really appreciated about Paizo and their willingness to engage with their player base. This just seems...odd.
I don't get thos take as it os clearly written (nearly identicalto the wizard). Learn a Spell is a very specific activity and is capitalized in the text for a reason. Necromancers use this activity the same as Wizards do. Their Dirge expands pretty easily. I saw the BadLuckGamer video where he ranted about this and I was yelling at my screen that he was spreading misinformation due to his lack of understanding the rules. I knew this would come up after that video.
No, the stickler here is that Void Warp has a target that specifically says "Targets 1 living creature" since that skeleton is not a living creature, it still cannot be targeted by Void Warp as the ability says nothing about changing the targeting parameters.
I'm very excited for the Necromancer's interactions with Thralls and believe this is a great way to get the feel of a horde with the mechanical balance of PF2e. I'll start off by listing my personal Pros/Cons on how I think this is implemented and will give more as I do real world playtests and hope others will add to the discussion as well. Pros:
- Interactions with focus spells are awesome and very flavorful. I want my minions to be expendable - Battlefield control is the Necromancer's vibe and these are a great way to do it. - Bone Spear! - Life Tap! - I'm going to stop there...most of the feats look really fun Cons:
- There is no way to get rid of unwanted Thralls if you don't have the right focus spell and have already used the Consume Thrall ability in the last 10 minutes. - Potential Solution - Give the necromancer an action that is not on a cooldown and doesn't use a focus point that destroys a thrall for a minor benefit. - What do I do with my thralls when I'm out of focus points? - Would like a little more variety on the saves they can target, fortitude is often pretty problematic (mathematically speaking) Questions:
- Dead Weight is a cool ability, but why would a creature try to "escape" when they can auto-succeed at attacking it and get rid of the condition? I'm sure I'll have more as I get my hands on this class in a game!
As info creeps in I'm loving Necromancer 1-action cantrip to summon a Thrall that can flank, gets to attack upon being summoned, takes up a square, has no apparent limit on how many you can have, scales in damage, scales at proficiency ranks for how many it summons, and fuels feats and focus spells or to replenish a focus point! Psychic progression spells that allow for more power budget to go to class feats and class abilities while still giving decent slots Int based class (I personally love Int based classes) Scaling undead lore with a feat that lets it be used on any creature with a skeleton! What's not to love so far?
Not only all of that, but higher level characters in a Mythoc campaign have more options to use their Mythic Points on. Basically, at low levels, this is great and usually optimal. At higher levels, you probably want to use those Mythoc Points for something else.
I can understand sometimes a bystander familiar getting caught in an AoE. But, as an example, having the enemy who's fighting for his life against a player party suddenly stop hitting the things that are killing it and focusing his attention on the tiny animal that just sits there and isn't a threat seems kinda... insane (to be polite)?Sometimes the enemy both isn't actually fighting for their life and is also a prick. If they're pretty clearly winning and being cruel is in character it's 100% on the table. Maybe within character, but still a dick move by the GM. This sounds too much like the toxic "that's what my character would do" to me.
I can understand sometimes a bystander familiar getting caught in an AoE. But, as an example, having the enemy who's fighting for his life against a player party suddenly stop hitting the things that are killing it and focusing his attention on the tiny animal that just sits there and isn't a threat seems kinda... insane (to be polite)? Exactly. Even if the Familiar is technically in an AoE (such as on the character's person) I won't have the AoE impact them. That is, unless they have made the familiar an active participant in the fight, but that is rare (outside of the Witch). It's just rude to shut down a familiar, especially when it is primarily for out-of-combat coolness.
Can someone give us an overview of the Callings? You can take a calling as early as lvl 1 if you are playing with Mythic rules and basically they give an extra Edict and Anathema you have to follow. Then, each one time you do crit succeed at something specifically called out by your Calling, you gain a Mythic Point. Additionally, some of the mythic feats below 12th level have prerequisites that you have a certain Calling. Most of the callings are pretty self explanatory in what their themes are based on their names. Hunter's Calling, for example, is focused on hunting and tracking. Thief's calling is focused on picking locks & stealing. For a full list of Callings, I listed them all out earlier in this thread.
It's on the grid, it's a target.The downside though, is your primary apparition IS the familiar, so if it dies, you lose a lot until you get it back the next day. Yeah, I typically play it that way as well and so do most GMs I know. However, most, myself included, don't put them on the grid unless the player specifically starts doing something with them in combat. Outside of that, I typically just consider them hanging out inside their coat or under their hat or something and basically protected.
I'll focus on this part of your post. Prophesied Monarch is less about prophesy and more about the person of myth to lead us in our time of need trope. It even calls out that while the prophesies are gone, these people still exist. Basically it is about a soul born in a time of great need to lead their people through a hardship or to a destiny. Even if/when you die, your memory lives on and your soul does not move through the river of souls. It simply waits to be reborn again to take up the mantle and lead once more when next they are needed.
So what's the capstone feat (L20) for archfiend like? Curious how the mythic archetype capstones stack up to normal class ones. Fiend Eternal: You become a true Archfiend and stop aging. You're realm is fully created and within Hell, the Outer Rifts, The Netherlands, or some other demiplane with fiendish tendencies you wish with you ruling it. You can transport there at will and if you ever hit 0 HP you become unconscious, but are transported to your Seat of Power in your realm and wake up an hour later. You also get a small group of fiendish followers who live in your realm. Flavor is awesome and one of my favorites. Mechanically it is very good as well. I also love that our Witch iconic is the one pictured in the art as becoming the Archfiend. |
