Drake_rocket's page

Organized Play Member. 26 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS


Question, and perhaps an overly simplistic one. How does Lweoh manage to enchant a colossal animated object? Does it not require CL 13?


A stat-boosting item does not follow the same rules as armor and weapon enhancements. For one, they don't come in +3 only in +2 and +4 (and higher).


AM BARBARIAN wrote:
Drake_rocket wrote:

I would personally have much more fun running for or playing a party at 15th level if it was composed of 3-4 selected from fighter/ranger/paladin/alchemist/bard/rogue/monk/gunslinger/barbarian/oracl e/magus for example as none of those classes manage to fundamentally alter the way the game works to quite the degree that a wizard does.

Just a personal flavor opinion though, rather than one based in theorycrafting.

GM NEVER SEEN NON-CRAPPY BARBARIAN. GM BEG FOR WIZARDS TO COME BACK.

Well that's true. Barbarians can break the game by physically breaking the game world in half with their fury.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Since I have yet to see anyone try straight arcane spellcasters in this, I'll give it a go.

Padma the Pyromancer
Gnome Sorc (Crossblooded Red Dragon/Elemental [primal, fire]) 10

ST: 6
DX: 18 (+2 4th/8th level +2 item)
CN: 14
IN: 11
WS: 12
CH: 21 (+4 item)

AC: 23 (+1 size, +4 dex, +4 mage armor, +3 shield, +1 dodge)
HP: 92 (77 base + 15 false life)
Saves: Fort: +9 Ref: +9 Will: +9

Gnome Racial trait pyromancer: +1 caster level with fire spells
Traits: Magical Lineage (scorching ray), Animal friend

Feats: Empower Spell, Point Blank Shot, Toughness, Maximize spell, Great Fortitude(free), Weapon Focus: Ray

Spells: Mage Armor, Scorching Ray, False life, other stuff

Skill: Some skills

Stuff:
+2 darkwood shield
+4 Headband of charisma
+2 belt of dex
+2 cloak of resistance
2 lesser metamagic rods of maximize
Other stuff, a decent amount of

Main attack: 3 Maximized Scorching Rays (CL: 11): +12 to hit (+1 size, +1 PBS, +1 WF, +4 DX, +5 BA) for 33 damage each (24 base, +1/die for each blood line, +1 point blank shot).

DPR: 97.15~

This can be sustained for up to 10 rounds violating none of the rules and up to 16 rounds if the two metamagic rods are allowed (this is not an unreasonable portion of wealth). The first is probably enough for most days, forcing you to drop to normal scorching rays (somewhere in the upper 50s for dpr) for the rest of the day (up to 14 more rounds), the second is most likely enough. Despite being a spellcaster primary, Padma meets the save and AC requirements, along with a good chunk of hit points compared to most builds here.

Padma is also capable of stealing the animal companion from Omelite, by dropping Empower Spell, Weapon Focus Ray (which she doesn't actually need to hit 95% of the time within 30 feet) and toughness to add 42.9. There by raising her DPR to 140.05

She certainly can't compete with some out there, but the girl really can hold her own, all while sticking out her tongue at the people who say arcane-types can't blast-o-mance anymore. She also can use her 1st-3rd level spells for other stuff, making her considerably more flexible than most builds.


Oddly enough, I hate wizards the most.

Largely, I dislike the fact that I find them to be the things most inhibiting the fun of playing games past say level 12 give or take. A fighter, even a druid or gunslinger or other high-damage class can certainly deal a lot of damage, but I tend to find it far simpler to create scary challenging monsters than I do to routinely block a wizard's bag of tricks when it comes to solving plots and playing god. Not to say it's impossible; a clever GM can do anything, but their progression of tools to solve problems and circumvent mortal and RP concerns gets out of hand faster than anyone else's.

Certainly sorcerers suffer this as well, along with witches and even clerics/summoners/druids, but for the most part the more limited spell selections and themes inhibit them a bit more than the same things do for wizards.

I would personally have much more fun running for or playing a party at 15th level if it was composed of 3-4 selected from fighter/ranger/paladin/alchemist/bard/rogue/monk/gunslinger/barbarian/oracl e/magus for example as none of those classes manage to fundamentally alter the way the game works to quite the degree that a wizard does.

Just a personal flavor opinion though, rather than one based in theorycrafting.


Maezer wrote:
Also the decision to discharge the stored spell is made by the wielder after the hit is determined. Its fairly rare for someone to still be wielding ammunition after its hit its target.

Mmm, not sure if I buy that. That would also mean that evil people could use holy arrows without having a negative level, since it would leave the moment they fired. And that's probably only one of many things that such an interpretation would cause. I'm pretty sure you're considered the wielder of an arrow you shoot, even RAW.


Allia Thren wrote:

It's under "Melee Weapon Special Abilities" and theres an extra list for Ranged weapons, where Spell storing is not mentioned.

I would assume ammunition can only be enchanted with those from the ranged list.

That's only a table of random items, not really a ruling of any kind. By that logic, ranged weapons and ammo also couldn't be ghost touch or keen, which makes very little sense


I don't doubt that someone's already come up with this, but when I was thinking through archery matters for a juju oracle of all things, I stumbled across the notion of carrying around +1 spell storing arrows. Is it just me or is it perfectly legal to load up each individual one with a spell? Certainly, they would be expended afterward, but it still seems like an effective trick to take a few days of casting and then proceed to have 15 +1 spell storing arrows each with a Bestow Curse in them, let's say.

Nothing about spell storing suggests it is melee-only and this would seem to be how ammunition would work.


BigNorseWolf wrote:
Quote:
I'm not trying to misrepresent the situation.

I'm not saying you're misrepresenting it. I'm saying that your situation is born of some unusual circumstances, and that if those circumstances were different you would be getting vastly different results.

Quote:
I do want to say, though, that I most frequently play Clerics and Life Oracles, and I have absolutely no problem using spell slots to heal my companions. It's a team sport. I still get to swing a weapon if I want to, or help with flanking, or become a knowledge: religion monster, or any amount of other things that are fun for me as a player. Saying "Nobody wants to do" something is usually not a truism.

Nobody sane wants to do it? *ducks*

The widespread use of wands has helped to somewhat reduce the "Awww man i have to play the healer" phenomenon. You CAN get by with just a wand, or better yet a wand and a secondary healer (alchemist, druid, paladin, inquisitor) I have no problem being a team player, but i want to be an individual too.

This isn't an argument about a mandatory healer. =/ I wish people would stop bringing it up. It is more, at this point, about asking whether there isn't a better solution to the issue than Wands of Cure Light Wounds and a few other things as well. It is not about demanding someone play a devoted healer because, frankly even a devoted healer probably couldn't even live up to the job.


Cartigan wrote:
Jeremiziah wrote:
Drake_rocket wrote:

Good Stuff

This seems like a hole in the system and wands of cure light wounds look more like a wad of chewing gum stuck in the hole. They work, but I can't help but feel like there is a better way.

This post was right on. Spot on. Applause.

Many groups, as previously identified, want to consistently top off after a fight, and refuse (to whatever degree they're able) to continue until they're fully healed. The fact that they feel that this is necessary is the crack in the system, and is the problem that causes wands of CLW to be necessary. In turn, the reason they feel this way is related to the massive damage some monsters can inflict with a single hit.

Essentially, I blame the concept of critical hits.

Critical hits? I've lost a half of my hit points as a Fighter with good con to two blows from a single creature of appropriate CR. The problem isn't wanting to heal up to full after every fight. That is not what is happening. What is happening is people want to heal themselves up so they can actually fight more than one fight in a day. Without the ability to heal, you have a 15 minute adventuring day just so people don't drop like flies against CR appropriate creatures.

I wasn't really going for critical hits as being the core of the worry, but a sort of more elaborate concern.


I'm not actually looking to disagree with the idea that people should be able to build a survivable (if not somewhat suboptimal) party without a devoted healer, much like I think that people should be able to build one without a devoted spell caster or melee fighter. I think if no one in your party wants to play a healer, they shouldn't be forced to, much like if no one wants to play a melee fighter they shouldn't be forced to.

Let's also, for the moment, set aside homebrews and other less RAW styles of play. I think we can all acknowledge that certain campaign styles, running styles and house rules can amend these worries, but that is true of pretty much every "problem" in PF.

Let's narrow the question to this: do we like this as a format for HP recovery? We can acknowledge that people healing to full or nearly full for many Adventure paths and PFS play is in the opinion of many required. We can even acknowledge that it would be good to not have to rely on just one specific class to do this and the assumption that people don't want to be "heal bots".

But even if people like the benefits of wands of CLW, isn't there a better way to handle this? Why is such a low level magic item so critical across so many levels? Is it really the best tool that could be designed to fill this job? Sure you might like not having to have a devoted healer, but does anyone actually enjoy tapping people with pixie sticks 10 times after every fight? It almost seems like you might as well just say everyone heals back to full after every fight and stuff costs 5% more to buy (representing the CLW wands tax).

I can acknowledge that just having to have a cleric would be lame. But right now there are what, 7 classes that have access to healing starting from first level (Cleric, bard, druid, oracle, alchemist, witch, paladin at level 2)? A much broader spread than in any prior edition.

I think that one might even conclude PC healing is chronically unable to keep pace with what it is expected to do. Let's say there was a feat that came out that said: This feat triples the healing of all Cure Spells and Infusions cast without a spell trigger and all healing done by Lay on Hands, while increasing the casting time to 1 minute. Would that even be broken? Would it make it possible to play without Wands in a PFS type game? That seems by all estimates a very powerful feat, but I'm not sure it would be enough. Would witches and alchemists and druids and bards take it?

This seems like a hole in the system and wands of cure light wounds look more like a wad of chewing gum stuck in the hole. They work, but I can't help but feel like there is a better way.


...Name says it all! Is there one? Couldn't find it in the base book.


Suggesting that the role of healer makes someone less is sort of a silly notion. A healer is a walking bandaid in the sense that a ranger is a walking pea shooter or a defense-oriented fighter is a walking hunk of meat. There are derisive ways you can phrase any role. Millions of mmo players and probably at least tens of thousands of D&D characters oriented towards healing would disagree with the sentiment that healing is invalid. You might not personally enjoy it, but that doesn't mean it isn't enjoyable.

In essence the issue is is that you're not substantially better off playing this role because a low-level magic item can do it better. You might not love the idea that one of the four members of a party has to be a healer, but its certainly not an uncommon one. Combat healing is of limited efficacy as has been pointed out and certainly isn't all there is to healing traditionally.

I tend to think that if an item can wholly substitute for an entire role at a very small cost it is probably not balanced well. I mean, let's say no one wanted to play a melee character or use summon spells. Would you advocate for a 1st wand that could make a party of an archer two wizards and a witch work? You could argue that it might be viable, but only about as much as a party without a healer And it is clear that the game is designed with a lot of healing on character sheets in mind, PF having vastly expanded who can heal...yet it still isn't player-reliant because of one single magic item.


Often times, in fact in virtually every guide that talks about healing even peripherally, we speak about Wands of Cure Light wounds as the main source of healing in PF. From a calculation, statistical and RAW point of view, this is a logical conclusion. But is it how things are meant to be?

Healing has been a role for a very long time across virtually every scope of fantasy gaming. Now you might combine it with something else to add a bit more flavor, but it is as tried and true an idea as a fighter or a wizard is. But both in 3.5 and now in Pathfinder, we find this concept being boiled down to a twig because, frankly it does the job better than any class.

Would we accept this if a wand of magic missile managed something similar for damage? Naturally there are all sorts of reasons why it doesn't, but let's say it was just as able to substitute for killing your enemies as well as a wand of CLW substitutes for keeping your friends alive (which is to say, in the long run, the wand is better than all but the most dedicated of classes and builds). Would it be accepted so easily? There is certainly one school of thought that suggests devoted healer or "support" shouldn't be a role, but let's leave that out of this talk for the moment. Leadership is often spoken of as a feat that is so powerful, every build should take it and most games ban it:

Is a wand of CLW not approaching the same level? Certainly people use things like rings of protection a lot as well, but at least they use -different levels- of rings of protection (we don't even use wands of cure serious wounds) and they aren't the sole source of what was once a primary purpose. Is it really in the spirit of things to carry around 20 healing twigs as a main source of mending? Is it really any fun or how anyone imagines heroic characters?


I also tend to think the whole using giant firearms thing will get errata'd. As for the weapon cords spoken of earlier, I'm not really sure I've seen where those come from, but they seem kind of abusive.


leo1925 wrote:
Although i congratulate you for going through all the headache to create a gunslinger guide, don't you think you should wait for the lightning reload and double barrel pistol clarifications/FAQ before creating the guide.

It's a starting point and while there are some holes, I think it has quite a bit of useful info. At least I like to think so.


I go for the sorceress. The witch costume has excellent detail and looks awesome, but is ultimately not very complex to compose (since many of the parts are modern clothing you can buy at hot topic...it's also part of why you see her cosplayed so much) or hard to wear. The gray maiden was also very impressive, but given that she's said she couldn't wear it for more than an hour or two means it's not really a functional costume. It might seem nit picky, but the idea behind cosplay often is to build something actually wear-able. Very pretty none the less.

The sorceress managed enthusiasm, an outfit whose major pieces could not just be picked up off the rack, involved well-done body paint and was functional to wear all day long.


Jadeite wrote:

How isn't the gun tank horrible? He replaces his dodge bonus with a situational deflection bonus (that doesn't stack with a ring of protection). Worse, he loses five bonus feats and replaces them with a nerfed version of armor training (no speed increase). Considering that the gun tank still needs dexterity to hit and deal damage, the ability to wear heavy armor isn't going to be that useful.

Why no mention of double barreled pistols? They nearly double the pistolero's DPR at high levels.

As for bucklers, a mithral buckler has no armor check penalty, so you can use them without problems even if you don't have the proficiency.

Gun tank horrible-ness was largely in the context of a mysterious stranger, which is a good bit -more- horrible. You'll notice it certainly wasn't made into any builds, but it can provide an edge at lower levels of game play due to the higher starting AC. A lot of people care about lower levels more than extremely high levels. But it's not really advisable, no.

As to double barreled pistols, that's a good catch I didn't speak much over. I'll put mention of it in the next edition. I confess, the firing two barrels at once rules seem a little odd to me, quirky at best.


Starbuck_II wrote:
Kung-Fu Joe wrote:


Rapid reload + Alchemy cartiridges (raises Misfire but all reduce reloading by 1 degree).

A Pistol is a 1 handed firearm. Standard action reload -2 actions = Free action.
Yes, it is more expensive to craft alchemical cartriges (6 gold crafted compared to 1 sp of a bullet crafted), but it helps reload a huge amount.

On a side note:
Remember size doesn't affect how many hands to use (only gives a penalty to hit and increases/decreases cost, depending if making bigger or smaller).
You could have large pistols in both hands as level 1 Pisterlo (if you didn't mind -2 hit penalty from a weapon inappropriately sized). It would increase damage, weight, and cost. But it is legal.

I'm not a huge fan of that kind of finegaling, but it might be valid for some.


Golden-Esque wrote:
Drake_rocket wrote:
I confess, I did not have time to fully digest UC feats. The deed feats were examined because they are very likely to be the first things looked at. I would not say this guide is comprehensive for feats from UC or UM.
It's no problem; Ultimate Combat JUST came out last week, and a lot of people haven't had the time to actually test all of the new rules and options. I think it's a little early for a definitive guide to the Gunslinger, especially when their their strengths, as you mentioned, are extremely different from any other weapon-based class in the game.

In my mind, one of the better ways to perfect and refine a guide is to start with a well thought out set of ideas, and then expose them to public discussion and review by capable co-gamers. That's the current process. This is particularly true for a new concept rather than ones with ancient roots that weight perceptions of them in all sorts of ways (wizards monks and druids from another guide come to mind ^.~).


DarkHomer420 wrote:
Drake, though I'm not a fan of the pre reqs, Dodge and Mobility, I am curious there was no mention of Deft Shootist. While the shooting AoO can be avoided by moving before firing I think the no AoO from reloading might be handy. Also, while Mysterious Stranger may be a sub par DPR choice it can help alleviate some MAD if going for a Holy Gun or Bard/Gunslinger build (something I myself am looking at).

A very good catch! It happened to be on the prior page where I did not think grit feats began.

I'm going to give it a *** rating despite the two feats. I would say it is stronger for the pistol build, because it is more at risk for AoOs (it will be particularly useful for lining up your cones if you want to AoE). It will be something you don't acquire till mid to late levels. It is definitely worth three feats later on once you have feats to burn; avoiding AoOs is very impressive and dodge and mobility hardly suck for you. I'll include this in the google doc when I get around to it.

For any instance where you plan to take fewer than 5 levels of gunslinger, Mysterious Stranger is perfectly viable and quite possibly optimal, because its biggest downside doesn't affect you. I could see the potential of a bard that dips a bit of gunslinger. I can mention this in the guide, but this was meant as a gunslinger-focused guide, rather than a general guide to gun use-ing options.


Areteas wrote:
Weapon Focus is good for one thing you have omitted here... prereq for the feat tree (believe it's called snapshot; don't have UC in front of me and it's not up in d20pfsrd.com yet) that lets you threaten with ranged weapons at 5-10 feet, which is nice for a gunslinger (particularly with combat reflexes). Maybe more useful for a pistolero type that's consistently going to be at mid- to short-range for engagements (as s/he'll be closed with more).

I confess, I did not have time to fully digest UC feats. The deed feats were examined because they are very likely to be the first things looked at. I would not say this guide is comprehensive for feats from UC or UM.


bartgroks wrote:
Drake_rocket wrote:
The bigger issue though, is having to wait till 11th level to get a stat to your damage.
Actually the mysterious stranger gets to add a stat to his damage at level 1. As long as he spends a grit or takes the signature deed feat.

Let us then amend the statement to "Consistently get a stat to your damage" to negate the idea that you could do meaningfully maintain expending grit to do this.

Signature deed requires level 11. It is clearly stated in the books and in the guide.


Golden-Esque wrote:

I actually don't agree with your assessment on the Gunslinger archetype, Mysterious Stranger. I have a player that is using it to great effect currently.

For those of you who do not know, the Mysterious Stranger does the following:

Trades:
Wisdom-Based Grit
1st level: Quick Clear, a deed used to fix firearms after they malfunction.
2nd level: Nimble: Dodge bonus to AC.
5th Level: Gun Training: An ability that allows the Gunslinger to add their Dexterity bonus to attacks made with a specific firearm.

Gains:
Charisma-Based Grit
1st level: Focused Aim, allows the gunslinger to spend grit to add their Charisma to attack rolls made with ANY firearm.
2nd Level: Lucky, bonus to Will saves.
5t Level: Fortune, fix a misfired weapon as a free action a number of times per day equal to Charisma mod.
11th Level, Clipping Shot, missed attacks deal half damage.

Ultimately, a Mysterious Stranger trades passive damage for a passive ability to fix their firearm. In my opinion, they're also better-rounded and more versatile then the standard Gunslinger. For one, they trade an AC bonus (not super important for a ranged character) and a Reflex save bonus (Gunslingers have this in spades) for a Will bonus (offsets them having a lower Wisdom AND is a weakness in the class to begin with). Not to mention their clearing mechanic does not require an action nor grit points, and although one can argue that you cannot do it as often (Charisma mod is going to be less then your grit total, even as a regular Wisdom-based Gunslinger), but in the long run, you're pretty unlucky if you misfire more then 3 - 5 times per day (16 to 20 is a fairly tame range to assume that a Charisma-relent character will possess.

Also, although the Mysterious Stranger needs to pay grit to add their ability modifier to their attack rolls (a downside), a benefit is that they can do this to ANY FIREARM THEY WIELD. This means that, especially in a campaign setting where firearms are fairly abundant, a Mysterious Stranger is much more versatile....

That is certainly an interesting take on it. Truthfully, most designs I would go with involve taking a reliable weapon early on (right after the distance enchantment). For pistol users, this means no misfires and for muskets it means 5%. This limits the usefulness of an auto-clear power. Even if you don't do this, there are several options you have later on for actions if you must spend a move to clear your gun.

My biggest problem ends up being the lack of real tangible benefit. Mysterious strangers trade one of the most powerful abilities for really nothing exciting. You're losing anywhere from 4-7 damage per shot on all of your attacks. Given that you pride yourself on shooting often, that really adds up. They don't get anything WOW to make up for it. Maybe if they picked up more class skills (stealth in particular) and a few appropriate spells (like invisibility, alter self, disguise self, fog cloud, etc) I'd be more impressed.

As for using your signature deed, well, that's a real waste. If you're a pistelero you get 3d6 on every attack (goes up to 5d6) and I sort of find clearing out your gun 3-4 times a day as a free action to be pretty weak compared to on-demand Targeting or being able to function long range. The bigger issue though, is having to wait till 11th level to get a stat to your damage.

Also, why you are correct that they can apply their damage bonus to any weapon they wield, only musket masters can functionally use two handed weapons (as others cannot reduce the reload time to free action). So they are limited to applying it to one-handers: ...which Pisteleros can already do to all of them.


Since it's been asked I'll go ahead and add

Far Shot **: Not worth your time early on and only okay later on if you picked deadeye as your signature deed. In reality, you just shouldn't be firing from outside of your first range increment and you don't need hit bonuses either.

Shot on the Run **: This is also very much in the meh-to-okay area. You can't manyshot with a gun, even though you do like anything that potentially enhances your mobility. The expensive feat chain that precedes it makes it at best an option for higher levels when you have feats out the ears.


36 people marked this as a favorite.

DrakeRocket's Gunslinger guide

Note on how I write guides: I am writing this to guide you to how to play an efficient combat-effective gunslinger. I don't actually like playing these sorts of characters myself, but I recognize that posting guides to how to play "the coolest RP gunslinger" is highly subjective, where as numbers are much less so. Please do not comment suggesting what follows is "no fun" or diminishing "style". I acknowledge this isn't based around those things and will only include notes about those things if they coincide with what is optimal.

What you need to know: As a gunslinger, your role is to kill things. You're reasonably tough, though not as much as a fighter, so you can take more punishment than many: after all, you've got your d10 hit dice and a passable AC. In function, though, you're closer to a ranger, only you lack much in the way of a ranger's versatility as a scout or nice things like spells or animal companion. You also don't have nearly the ranger's range if he is an archer or switch hitter. So why bother with a gunslinger? Well, for one, it's darn cool to use flintlocks and there is a lot to be said for theme. But if you want a statistical reason here is the big one: You are able to deal out huge damage more -consistently- than any other class. On a secondary note, you eventually develop quite a decent amount of utility in combat, though not much outside of it.

Note that this guide assumes middle gun rarity. Advanced guns make gunslingers very potent in some ways and truly rare guns make them too weak. I personally feel gunslingers are "meant" to be played at the middle rarity.

Stat Priorities:

St: This doesn't hold much use to a gunslinger unless you plan to melee a lot (which isn't a very good idea).

Dex: This is your go-to stat. It is more awesome for you than any other class.

Cn: You'll be closer to melee than many ranged fighters, so it's not good to totally trash this. Still, you have a d10 which isn't bad.
Int: Can be dump-stat-ish, pick it up if you want more skills but it doesn't help your abilities

Wis: The stat you wish you could dump, but probably shouldn't because it is the sole thing outside of feats that determines how much grit you have. I'd try to give it a 14 if you could, though if you really love grit you could give it more. If you plan to take extra grit, you could probably even just have a 10 or 8 since the minimum is 1, but you won't get to use a lot of deeds until later on. This isn't the end of the world, but you're better off trying to get 2-3 grit as soon as possible. Also influences perception and survival.

Cha: Tragically is also a dump stat. Provides little to no mechanical benefit unless you happen to take the Mysterious Stranger Archetype, which you should never do because it is terrible as it lacks gun training. If you want to be the face, however, because your party lacks a bard or rogue, you probably can trash enough other stats without damaging your efficacy to manage a good charisma.

Races:

Human ****: The best race you can pick. Gunslingers want feats desperately at low levels and humans can pick up the all-important dex bonus. Human is almost required if you're trying the Creepy Twin Gun build below.

Half-Elf ***: Also can get the all important dex bonus, a nice perception bonus, along with a nice skill focus (which I'd strongly recommend throwing onto stealth so you can be a bit of a scout or diplomacy or sense motive if you want to be a face).

Half-Orc***: Similar to half elf, only you get ferocity instead of a skill bonus. Dark vision can be a big plus though. Might be a bit better than half-elf.

Elf**: A good option still, I'd give it more like two and a half stars just for the dex bonus and perception bonus.

Halfing**: Gets the dex bonus which is nice, but the 20 feet movement speed is crippling for a class that has such a narrow window of attack. Trading +1 hit for less damage is also a very bad trade for a gunslinger. Some of the skill bonuses aren't bad though, nor is the stealth bonus if you wanna go that route.

Gnome and Dwarf: Awful. 20 foot speed -and- no dex bonus.

Skills: ( we will only discuss ones worth taking for mechanical reasons. Those not on this list are more for flavor to your personal character.)

Acrobatics****: You will need to move eventually as a gunslinger, because your window is so narrow. Plus it's class and dex-based. Win. Further, the extra +1 to ac for fighting defensively will be quite handy.

Bluff**: A decent skill, but your dumping of cha hurts it, even though it is class. Take it if you really wanna be a face because your party has no better options. If you're a half elf and going this route, be sure to nab skill focus: diplomacy or sense motive to round out their social skills.

Climb*: Worth a rank or two early on. Not much else

Craft: Alchemy****: One point in this is mandatory. -Mandatory-. Beyond that it's no more useful for you than any other class.

Intimidate**: You're probably not going to do the dazzling display route due to your desire for feats, but if you feel like it, it's not the worst option.

Knowledge Local ***: This comes up all of the time.

Perception****: Most used skill in the game

Slight of hand**: If you use pistols, it's okay for hiding them and doing tricks. Not great.

Stealth ***: A very good skill for someone who is probably using light armor has a good perception and has a high dex. Not being class hurts, but it is still very solid.

Survival***: If your party lacks a ranger or druid, you're not bad at tracking or using this skill due to your wisdom and it being a class skill.

Gun Use 101: Your main advantage over othe damage dealers is that firearms ignore armor and natural armor when used within their first ranged increment. The value of this simply cannot be over-stated. Shooting a young red dragon requires a roll 8 lower than hitting it with a sword. Shooting a griffon with a gun requires a roll 6 lower than with a bow. Shooting a Balor is *16* numbers easier. What is more, you're using full BaB, multiple attacks and powerfully enchanted weapons. Further, unlike a archer, starting at level 5 you do not need to split stats for hit and damage: dex gives you both. This effect starts off strong and only gets more powerful as time goes on. Almost all monsters (and entirely all enemies with character classes) rely on armor. Your entire style no matter what gunslinger variant you play will rely on keeping out of melee range for the most part and keeping within your weapon's first range increment. This is one of the bigger challenges of the class, but will be quite rewarding if you can pull it off.

Gun Use 102: TL;DR: You hit all the time because you ignore armor and nat armor. The way that this leads you to build is that you can sacrifice a lot of to hit abilities in favor of damage. This is typically the formula, and most characters need to maintain a balance. You don't. You're going to hit most every mob, even with your secondary attacks. Yes, sometimes the very-high dex and small size opponents with lots of deflection will come up, but it is rare. Don't shoot them when they do come up: shoot the big lumbering things. Again, we are talking about an average AC 4-10 points lower than a fighter needs to hit while having almost as many bonuses to hit as he does. At higher levels this becomes even more true. One of the downsides to guns, however, is the misfire chance. For gunslingers, this mostly just means every now and then you'll have to lose a move action to clear your gun (by spending a grit point). Pistols misfire 5% of the time, muskets misfire 10%. It will come up, be ready for it and don't freak out when it does, it's not a huge deal.

Gun Use 103: TL;DR: Use a pistol, dragon pistol or a musket depending on your build and ignore other things; always use paper cartridges. There are many misleading guns available to you in the guns section, along with misleading weird ammo. The cone-damage weapons are not really worth your while due to their minimal damage and your inability to get your dex to damage on them unless you devote yourself to them: a foolish idea. You're not an AoE class, leave that to the alchemist and the sorcerers (also to Trentmonk because he hates those blasty spells so much). If you desperately need to use aoe and weird bullets, use a dragon pistol (following the guidelines for pistol users): it's flexible, can be reduced to a free reload and not bad (assuming, of course, the text of the weapon is a typo giving it a 10 foot range and the listing is accurate; otherwise this gun is also awful). You might be tempted by the weird ammo too, but none of it scales with level and it really isn't worth it. The two I will talk about briefly are the Culverin and the Double hackbut. Both of them have very high damage that can situationally be useful for giant alpha strikes using Deadshot. This becomes pragmatic if you specialize in either one as your -second- (NOT FIRST) gun, dropping it and switching to a gun that can be reloaded as a free action after. Depending on rules interpretation and what spells are on you (see Deadshot below), you might see numbers like 10d12+15 or more at 11th level. Generally though, these guns are really stupid because they require you to brace them or wheel around a small cart (which might work for some players, but strikes me as having all kinds of problems). They are little toys, not bread and butter.

Grit: This is your unique resource. It probably could be best compared to Ki, but you don't get as much of it to start off with and it doesn't do nearly as much, particularly at low levels. You get grit equal to your wisdom bonus at the start of the day, use it up with certain deeds that cost it and you restore it either by getting crits or by getting killing blows with your gun. There is also no way to raise it without feats/magic items or more wisdom (doesn't scale with level like almost every other resource). The key to grit is to never be full but never be out. A number of your deeds are free but require you to have at least one grit in your reserve, however, you can never be sure when you'll get grit back so getting a crit or getting a kill shot will be wasted if you are full. If you follow this guide, you'll end up having between 2 and 5 grit, which is perfectly acceptable in my mind.

Deeds: We'll go through these and explain them, rate them, and say how best to use them.

Deadeye ***: This is to help you when you mess up and aren't in the right range, or during the start of fights. Problem is it only lasts 1 attack, not one round. The three star rating is due to the usefulness of it when Signature Deed becomes available (See below), on its own, it's situational

Gunslinger's Dodge **: Situational, as ranged attacks are rarer than melee, but good for dodging rays. The movement could be put to interesting tactical uses.

Quick Clear ***: You will misfire. This will make it suck less.

Gunslingers Initiative ***: Free +2 to int that stacks with improved
int and a cool little side effect. Not bad at all.

Pistol Whip ***: This should not be underestimated. One of the worst situations a ranged fighter gets into is being put into melee. As a full BAB character, you will almost certainly hit with a single attack and you are even pretty likely to succeed in knocking them down. Now they suddenly don't provoke AoOs as you take a move away from them to unload into them next round (they probably can't even get to you to attack after getting up either).

Utility shot *: This is pretty much awful from a rules point of view. The effects are more move-cinematic than useful.

Deadshot ????: I really hope this deed will be clarified. In the most liberal interpretation, you can employ things like rapid shot and haste along with it. In the most conservative, you can only use your base number of attacks. This deed allows you to pool all of your attacks for a round into one single super attack at the price of a full round action and only getting to apply your precision damage (sneak attack if you have it) and energy weapon enchants once. There are three big advantages to this: one, you don't have to reload: this is very important if using a stupid gun to juke the deed. Two: you overcome DR much more readily. Three: A much higher chance of a massive crit. In essence, if any of your attacks crit, all you have to do is confirm at -5 from your highest to hit (pathetically easy for you) to have the -entire- damage crit: remember for a moment that guns do x4 crits. Let's give a zany example: You are 11th level, have a +1 double hackbut prepared for these kinds of moments, boots of haste, a 24 DX (reasonable at this level), deadly aim and rapid shot, having also taken a double hackbut as one of your gun training guns. Assuming you hit with all of your attacks (a not unreasonable circumstance on many creatures of this level, given your all important armor ignoring ability) you inflict 10d12+14 (or roughly the same as 20d6+14 if that sounds more impressive). No, that's not a joke. +7 damage from your dex, +6 from deadly aim, +1 from the weapon and base 2d12 for the weapon x5 gives you that. And, if you crit on any of those five attacks (getting a 19-20 isn't hard really), you're dishing out 40d12+70 (or 80d6+70 if you prefer). Around 330 damage on average. Let's assume you were fighting a typical "hard" encounter of that level: a Glabrezu (CR: 13, AC against you: 8). You have just done almost twice the damage needed to one-shot him. Indeed, with a little luck on attack rolls (pitting your weakest attack against a 17 ac) you could almost one-shot a CR: 20 pit fiend. The more conservative version renders this deed still useful, 6d12+14 isn't bad by any means for a full round action at 11th level, but it is probably weaker than just attacking normally. It then becomes a gambit for crits and a way to bypass DR easier. If the liberal version is true a *** or even **** rating is in order. If not it's on the low end of ** given the fuss of changing weapons and its very limited use with your primary weapon.

Startling shot *** or maybe even **** if you have a rogue in the party: I give this a higher raiting than most because I personally like things that can so well be used in team work situations. It has no grit cost, no save, not even a -hit- roll and is excellent to use against a foe out your range increment who has a high dex-based AC (people you should hate anyway because they are a nuisance to you). If you happen to have an attractive rogue in your party (as they often are), letting them free sneak attack anyone anytime will almost certainly earn you company on those long cold nights adventuring. The fighter with his pitiful concerns about rolling a d20 to hit things won't mind either. You can also use it to stop attacks of opportunity while you make good your escape from melee. Really, a very cool little deed.

Targeting ****: This is when your ability to influence the battlefield in ways other than leaving bloody smears really comes into play. Torso and wings aren't great, but an almost guaranteed disarm, a no-save confusion and practically automatic knockdown are all solid choices. Giving up your precious damage is painful, but some of these debuffs on big-bads can be really devestating, particularly since they entirely circumvent most normal defenses against such things. If you thought you were a giant-badguy killer before, you're even more so now.

Bleeding ***: This is quite good, because it is the first time you can directly turn grit into damage and quite a bit of damage at that (because you didn't already do enough damage O.o). The stat damage versions aren't particularly strong, but can have their place if you use this as your signature deed.

Lightning Reload*: There is a weird build in which you can make deadshot your signature deed and use it in combination with this to constantly make those big attacks mentioned above with one of the stupid guns. If your DM is using the liberal interpretation, then this might be worthwhile...but people should throw bricks at you for doing it. If he doesn't the build doesn't work well. In any case, this is a crappy deed since you should already be reloading as a free action way earlier on.

Evasive ***: Wow...kinda wish these three had been spread out a bit more...

Menacing shot *: AoEs centered on you that affect your allies are never very good.

Slinger's luck***: This can and probably will save your life.

Cheat Death ***: It is hard to find fault with a power that lets you not die, no matter how much it costs.

Stunning shot **: If this appeared at 7th level along with the other debuffs, I'd like it. It's pretty meh at this point though.

Deadly shot**: Yeah I know it's a low rating, but if you just crit someone with a firearm, they are probably going to die anyway. And if they don't, they probably have a very high fort save to match those very high HP totals.

Other abilities:

Nimble: Along with having a trusty buckler, this makes up a good bit of your defensive ability. Good against touch attacks and other people shooting guns at you too.

Gun training: Before you get this, you will probably feel a bit weak in damage. After you get it, it is probably the single biggest swing in damage for its level anyone sees. You weren't a real gunslinger before you got this.

Feats: Initially you will feel like you could never have enough feats. Later on, however, you'll wonder what to do with them.

Rapid Reload****: I almost gave this a fifth star. This feat is definitive of the class and you must take it and yes, you must take it at first level (unless you are a musketeer, then you get it as a bonus). Moving and reloading is required of you, even before you can make multiple attacks.

Point Blank Shot ****: You must take it. End of story

Rapid shot ****: The core of your strength is trading to hit for damage. Nothing does this better.

Deadly Aim ****: Second only to rapid shot in terms of helping you do best.

You're really holding your breath until you have all four of these. After that, life gets easier

Precise Shot ***: Yeah, you don't generally need any help hitting things, but +4 is a big swing even for you.

Improved Precise Shot ***: Again good stuff

Manyshot *: Would be a 3 or 4 if it didn't specify bows. Sad pies. Hope it gets errata'd.

Weapon Focus *: Not really worth it for you. You don't need hit.

Quick Draw ***: This has a lot of potentially cool applications and gives you a neat trick with your Initiative Deed. A good candidate for your later level deeds and great for a pistol user who has a hand free anyway.

Improved Initiative **: You have a really good chance of being first already. Adding this makes it almost a guarantee. The downside is that you're likely to be out of range at the start. You'll pretty much auto-hit though, given that the flat footed folks now lack dex, dodge -and- armor bonuses.

Improved Critical ***: This is very strong. Yes, you're only expanding your threat range by 1. However, given how deadshot might work and the sheer power of x4 crits, it is worth your while.

Other Critical feats **: You don't really crit often enough for these to be great.

Extra Grit ***: This really isn't a bad feat, particularly once you hit 7th level and want to start having fun with targeting.

Dodge **: Would be okay if you didn't have a lot to spend feats on

Mobility **: You might feel this is a good choice given your tactics, and you might be right if you weren't so feat hungry up until mid levels. Feat chains are not your friend.

Toughness **: Everyone says this is great. It's not so great for you.

Blind Fight **: Chiefly good as a later-level lead up to Ricochet Shot Deed

Ricochet Shot Deed ***: The only deed extra feat worth anything, it has a lot of potential tactical uses. It's a rough three because of the questionable blind-fight need, but is a good option for those many free feats you suddenly find yourself with once you reach mid and high levels.

Secret Stash*: Um...who cares?

Leaping Shot*: I don't really like my feats that require two prereqs to inflict conditions on me like prone.

No Name*: If this actually let you use disguise self, it'd be alright. As it is, it's very confusing.

Signature deed ****: This feat is the best thing you'll buy since your early feats. It influences your playstyle almost as much as a class feature would. There are three viable options, all very powerful in their own way: Bleeding gives you the highest damage potential and can situationally inflict crippling levels of ability damage over several shots. Deadeye Shot turns you into a real ranged character, dramatically increasing your functional range. Finally, targeting really ramps up your ability to debuff. All are good choices and it's really hard to pick.

Tactics:

Combat Maneuvers: Most of these are not ideal for you, as you can't use your ability to ignore armor effectively. However, your Targetting deed is a worthy substitution.

Fighting Defensively: -4 to hit for +3 ac (acrobatics) will be useful to you. Not always, but you have to understand that there will be times when you're shooting at ACs of 7 or 8 even at double digit levels with +7 or more even on your worst attack. This is particularly useful when you're forced to move and only get one attack.

Positioning: A lot of your game is about being in the right spot. Learn to optimize this and you will do well.

Builds: Unlike many classes, gunslingers really do best when they use their archetypes. I'll cover the ones I think are best. If you don't want to use them, or you want to be a mysterious stranger (horrible) or gun tank (not bad), roughly follow the guidelines of Pistolero.

The Musket Master:

If you're going to use a two handed weapon, you must take this archetype. It is the only way to reload them as a free action. I tend to think this is the strongest build, but not really because of the 1d12 base damage: instead, it is because of the free rapid reload feat early on and, of far more importance, the range of the musket. At 40 yards, you will be able to use your real power far more often than a pistol wielder ever can. Once you get a weapon of distance you will be a real ranged fighter. There's not a ton to explain here: use your musket and follow the rest of the guide, but your quality of life and ease of positioning will be far greater.

The Pistolero:

The Pistolero trades the far better and very useful range of the Musket Master for a higher future damage threshold, more use for grit and the potential for AoE. If you like 15 foot cones a lot, pick up a dragon pistol as your main gun, being wary of the doubled misfire range. If you're really good about positioning, you could potentially get a good amount of mileage out of the aoe and, unlike the musket master, you can still use this weapon to make good single-target attacks. The big deal here though is Up Close and Deadly. It gives you more omph early on for your grit points if you like direct damage. More importantly, it probably becomes the highest damage potential, as making it your signature deed just flatly adds 3d6 to almost every one of your attacks, going as high as 5d6 later on. It's hard to argue with. The big downside aside from the loss of range is the loss of cute rogue nookie, due to the loss of startling shot.

The Creepy Two Gun Build:

Alright, so, I -know- someone is going to want to play a two-gun wielding character and they are going to plead to DrakeRocket to tell them how. The reality of this is that Gunslinger does not support an effective way to use two pistols, because you have to have a hand free to reload. Other classes however...

Alchemist: Yup. I am telling you to take two levels in alchemist. In particular pick up vivisectionist for the 1d6 sneak attack instead of a worthless (to you) bomb. This gives you a few okay infusions, a very nice mutagen for your dex that will last most of a dungeon and, of greatest importance: the vestigial arm or tentacle discoveries from Ultimate Magic. Yup, use horrific potions to grow extra limbs to reload your weapon.

Witch: This -might- work, but the wording is unclear. In this case, you would only take 1 level and use prehensile hair. It says the hair cannot manipulate weapons, but I tend to think this means it cannot wield weapons rather than being unable to reload them. Some of the hexes you get (including later on bonus hexes) don't suck.
Beyond that, build like a pistolero, but pick up two-weapon fighting early. The big downside to this build, aside from losing the level or two, is that unlike most two weapon fighters, you're not fighting with a light weapon in your off-hand. It's a ranged weapon. So welcome to -4 on all your attacks. For many classes, this would be a deal-breaker. For a gunslinger, it is not, but it does push even his crazy easy hits to the limit. It will limit your options to do other things, but it is probably viable. And hey, +4 dex, +2 nat armor and +1d6 sneak attack plus some infusions is hardly worthless.

Quick Equipment guide:

This guide is already longer than I intended, so really briefly I'll address some less than obvious choices: Always use a buckler. It doesn't harm your attacks and it is a cheap way to pick up more ac by enchanting it. Second, pick up a distance weapon asap. Energy types are better for you in the way that they deal more damage without wasted bonus hit, but resistances make these a little more shakey.

Hope you enjoyed reading, feel free to comment.