Dragonklaw82's page

True, but it is a smart move, you gotta admit. One of the biggest problems with his image is that he seems like the kind of guy that would yell at you to get of his lawn. A female VP pick says, "hey voters, I'm hip, I dig all this crazy equality stuff too!"

Now if he can just get his staffers to quit insulting the gaming community...

Wow! No Lathander.

My player will be pissed.

No more Tyr either? or Helm? and Torm promoted?

I liked Tyr better, but I guess the maimed god didn't fit with the designer's philosophies.

Actually Lathander is now called Aumanator (sp?). They talk about it a bit in Rich Baker's Swordmage novel.

Dragonklaw82 wrote:

W00t! Maybe now a sliver, nay, a speck, of hope, for Pathfinder 4e?

Yeah, I doubt it too, but still the possibility of a fair GSL is exciting.

Pathfinder 4e will probably be the sign that Paizo's about to go under.

I respectfully disagree. In fact, I'd love to see 4e supported by Paizo in addition to their own Pathfinder games. Of course, the new GSL would have to be radically different for that to happen, but I guess we'll see.

W00t! Maybe now a sliver, nay, a speck, of hope, for Pathfinder 4e?

Yeah, I doubt it too, but still the possibility of a fair GSL is exciting.

Its been long enough for me that it has "lost its luster", but that hasn't stopped me from enjoying it. I'm still having fun with it, and when I ask myself "which system do I want to run?" the answer is still 4e. No, for me, the game's shiny newness has worn off and that allows me to see where it needs improvement. Sometimes a houserule is a quick fix, other times I have to work around the problem, but ultimately the game is still a lot of fun for me.

On the other hand, with the newness factor gone, I am left with a familiarity that allows me to try new and exciting things with the system. So its a trade-off. I now know the system is not perfect, but that knowledge serves me to make my games even better.