Kitsune

DoomOtter's page

Organized Play Member. 22 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 8 Organized Play characters. 1 alias.



2 people marked this as a favorite.

Serenity (firefly)

Amaterasu (starship operators)

Normandy SR2 (mass effect 2/3)


2 people marked this as a favorite.

The only race in pathfinder that I would want to be core is kitsune, but I can almost guarantee that they will not make the cut. Besides I would be more interested in new alien races than the same old ones from pathfinder.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

In the off chance that I was my favored race I would worship Daikitsu. Aside from that Desna is the deity that I feel most comes close to my ideals.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
The Usual Suspect wrote:
Pan wrote:
Christopher Dudley wrote:
DoomOtter wrote:
I hate it when people play classes and races stereotypically.
Yeah, that used to bug me, then I figured that maybe I've seen it hundreds of times, but they haven't gotten to play it hundreds of times, so, I just smile and nod. I haven't seen a clichéd character type that didn't have some individual expression come through in it.
+1 The only characters I hate at the table are absolutists. You know the type that must murder on site their favored enemy even to the point of suicidal odds, or the guy playing a "pharasmin follower" so he must destroy all undead immediately despite any assistance or leads say a ghost might provide the party, also the paladin that detects evil 24/7 and kills immediately once ping'd no matter the context. Those folks need not apply at my table.
SO in agreement here. I would so pone a paladin that automatically attacked all evil characters on sight. What happened to the lawful part of lawful good? What gives you a right to attack another character in game? This of course depends on the situation; but if you're playing an urban campaign and you meet the BBEG at the King's ball you don't whip out your holy avenger and cut him down. The King, who can't detect evil, might not like you cutting the head off his adviser. Players that can't understand that basic idea need to take a step back and check themselves.

I once played a paladin who I modeled after Shepherd book. I wasn't overbearing, and while disapproving of questionable acts I never got indignant. I figured that he would not hold others to his extremely high standard. There was another player who threw a fit, saying that I wasn't playing him like I should. He said that paladin's should be played lawful stupid.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

I hate it when people play classes and races stereotypically. A paladin doesn't have to be a self righteous douche, a barbarian doesn't have to be a moron,wizards and alchemists don't have to be eccentrics, elves don't have to be tree huggers, and dwarves don't have to be drunkards.

Please be original!