Lorkmir wrote:
Anorak wrote:
Company Blog has been posted. It seems they were still in discussions (If Jim is being honest) when Nethys dropped that post.
The thing that stands out to me though is that, as some would say "the math ain't mathing".
Jim says
Jim Butler wrote:
Archives placed a legal notice explaining that they had a license to use artwork and other elements, but other sites routinely copied those assets and used them for themselves. That created additional work for our legal and licensing teams to draft DMCA and cease‑and‑desist notices.
This logic would also apply to Demiplane would it not? You can also go there to find publicly accessible art that can be downloaded and posted elsewhere. So, this change to AoN won't eliminate that work; anyone who was doing that using AoN will just switch to Demiplane or other sources and keep doing it. And before anyone says "well, Demiplane makes them more money to cover the cost", that doesn't matter because AoN was volunteer. Any costs to Paizo by AoN would be minimal and should be considered as highly cost-effective marketing and good press.
This justification just doesn't make sense unless they are also going to have Demiplane remove art, or make it pay to access only where you only see art for things you've purchased there. (which would be an even bigger mistake than this mind you.)
This whole AoN debacle, along with recent blunders and issues, have made me seriously question the competence of Paizo's management. At a time like this, when clearly, they need to be bringing in more revenue and increasing customer spending, they should be doing the exact opposite of this.
They should be expanding their relationship with AoN instead of reducing it. I found out today, through a random reddit post, that there was a sale going on for PDF adventures. Mind you, that poster only found out through Tumblr. TUMBLR?! Instead of reducing or ending the...
I agree, the cost for the lawyers is drastically lower than the cost of trying to replicate this tool, a tool I consider central to making it easy to run games in this system despite the depth and complexity of the rules. I also agree, if someone wants to copy art, they'll scrape Demiplane. I further agree, I never have seen Paizo taking advantage of free advertising space that most of us are accessing several times per session we play - high value targeted advertising to your dedicated customers.
Also it's bad form to try to defensively throw AoN under the bus by defensively blaming them for sharing an announcement when they seem to have been unsure where they stood and were in jeopardy of having to do a sudden last minute change that would have been a shock to the community that would probably blow back harder than this little dust storm is. It's like when an NFL owner blames a player for not negotiating fairly when they don't really have any power in this situation, it looks petty and disrespectful to unpaid volunteers who add immense value, and have gone above and beyond for you in handling issues like the remaster that threw us all in a tizzy as GMs and Players, especially in PFS where we have to abide the rules correctly. You should have handled those conversations directly and not in public. In my opinion of course. I raised in another post, even if not using it for ads, if you had given a chance for them to do a funding drive I would have chipped in money happily, just like I do for charities run by cons and by Foundery Pf2E developers to give back, especially knowing Paizo is struggling.
I guess I'm just disappointed. Paizo has built a reputation of proactively working with it's volunteer communities. I want to give you my money, make it easy to give you my money. This makes it harder to be excited to give you my money.