Christianmichael Dutton's page

Wicht wrote:

Is there an actual cut in the tax rate? I thought the rate remained the same but the amount withheld was being lowered? That is at the end of the year you will still owe the same amount as you would have anyways.

Sorry. This is probably the wrong site to be asking this. :) I just saw the post and wondered about the wording.

Honestly, I don't know. When President Obama presented it, he did so as a rate cut. Whether it is a cut in the actual rate, or just the rate that is withheld, that I'm not sure one.

It's a reduction of payroll taxes actually taken out that will equate to the stimulus amount per person/couple. That translates about $13-$15 per person per week. You'll get more if you're married.

Enjoy!

Hi all - I have a bit of a problem & am looking for advice.

Anyone else have issues with players and rule exploits? I'd like to hear what you have to say.

Oh yeah, I've been down that road before. We had one player who would look for all the broken stuff in our FR supplements. Some of the stuff he came up with was pretty clever.

Anyways, at the beginning of the most recent campaign I started, I wrote that turnaround is fair play. If a player finds the cool feat, uber spell, and cool combos from official material, it will only make sense that highly intelligent foes will possess the same abilities and resources. The most common example is using Sunder feat. If the players don't want me using Sunder on their magic weapons, then they should avoid picking the feat themselves. Another example was a player who found that Many Jaws from the Spell Compendium was a better spell than fireball, so naturally some evil NPC sorcerers and wizards would have that spell.

I agree with the original poster. Making us go to 3.5 without at least some adoption of the new ruleset is bad. I don't want to play 3.5, I want to play Pathfinder. While I understand that Pathfinder isn't finished, Paizo can at least release some Campaign Standards with the races and classes--at least something!

So I'm looking at the picture of the sarcophagus and I've read the module and it states that the hand is an important clue to find the true tomb location, but I think I'm wracking my brain over something that may be too simple. I don't see the relation of the hand that gives a clue to the players to the location of the true tomb.

Does anyone know the exact page number that either 1) explains the clue or 2) can tell me what I'm supposed to figure out?

Reason being is that when I show my players the handout of the sarcophagus, it's going to be obvious of the hand magnified that to the players, it will might as well read, "THIS IS A CLUE".