
ChamomileKing |
ChamomileKing wrote:Ok, I hear you. So unless a spell specifically says you need line of sight, all it necessitates is line of effect?Yes.
Look at the spell and see what it is affecting. You need line of effect to that. Every spell affects something or it is not doing anything. If the effect is just on you then line of effect is trivial.
Likewise what does it target? You need line of sight to that. But many spells don't target anything.
Ok, thanks for that. Sorry if I'm beating a dead horse, in my brain having line of sight automatically means you have line of effect, I suppose I didn't realize there were two different things at work here so I'm having a difficult time separating them....
So if a spell has a target it needs both line of effect AND line of sight?
But just to be specific. My game has a character who just went down, and our cleric is wanting to use Breathe of Life as a reaction. It has a target (the triggering creature). The cleric might be behind a cave wall or something. in this case, there is no line of effect, so it's not possible, correct?
But say, the character went down within a stinking cloud...he could still use Breath of life even though he can't see her, because there's nothing obstructing him. Or is it that he couldn't use it because he can't see into it, and therefore cannot target the character?