![]()
![]()
![]() Vic Wertz wrote: I can only tell you about the Pocket Editions that have been announced thus far: the Rise of the Runelords Anniversary Edition in February, the Curse of the Crimson Throne in May, and the Starfinder RPG Core Rulebook in July. Now that it's almost June, has there been any new announcements regarding Pathfinder Pocket Editions for 1st Edition? Or, barring that, any other announcements for any pocket editions beyond what you mentioned in January (such as any additional Starfinder books)? Thank you! ![]()
![]() Katina Davis wrote: Whoops, I almost forgot the part about the subscription! Sorry about that. I've made sure your subscription was canceled this time, and you should be receiving a confirmation email for that as well. Just let me know if it's still giving you any trouble. Thanks, have a great evening! Everything is perfect - order arrived today! Thanks again! ![]()
![]() Righto, so, I'd like to add the Starfinder Pawn Bases, Yellow, in Large and Huge to what's existing in my cart, and then process that order on the card that ends with 57. Additionally, it seems my Pawns subscription is hung up - it was supposed to cancel after Strange Aeons shipped out a couple years ago, but neither did the pawns ship, nor did the sub cancel. I've obtained the pawns already, so I don't need anything shipped on that sub, just it cancelled out entirely. As my cart sits now, it appears to be processing the promo code correctly, shipping method is correct, and all I need to do is hit "Place Your Order", so please let me know if I need to submit the order first, before you can proceed with the additions. Thank you! ![]()
![]() I'd like to cancel the following subscriptions immediately:: Pathfinder Adventure Path
I'd like to cancel the following subscriptions as follows: Pathfinder Comics after Worldscape #6
Are you able to do that, or do I need to come back and cancel these once those items have shipped? ![]()
![]() ICv2 states that the Hollow Mountain hardcover is releasing on Wednesday. I can't find a Paizo product listing (perhaps I'm not looking hard enough) for this - specifically, the Paizo-exclusive cover. Do you folks have a Paizo release date for this? Thanks! ![]()
![]() Firstbourne wrote:
Things I've learned from Kickstarter thieves: Don't give money to people named Gary. ![]()
![]() I'm making an impromptu visit to the Seattle area tomorrow. On the way up, I was planning on visiting Olympic Cards & Comics in Lacey, but I wanted to check to see if there's any must-visit spots in the greater Seattle area. I'm most interested in places that would have large OOP/old stock collections, but I'm game to anything that's at the epic-awesome level. Thanks! ![]()
![]() In that ruling, the gem version of the bag (the rarest of the versions) is craptacular compared to the more common CP/EP/PP bag. How do you reconcile that against the stated "*Base 10 g.p. gems" etc.? At a minimum, that would seem to be 26 10 gp gems, but even then, that still makes the bag not as desirable as the more common version. Rolling 01-50 gets you a bag that provides 26 SP, EP and GP daily.
*** The 26th coin/gem is the one you put in the bag originally, so you net out 25 coins/gems the next day. Bag Type 3 would be superior to Bag Type 1, in the sense that you get 100 GP of gems instead of 25 GP of gold. Bag Type 2, however, would be superior to Bag Type 3, in the sense that you get 25 PP, worth 125 GP in 1E/2E conversion rates (5 GP = 1 PP), as opposed to 100 GP of gems. It doesn't make sense that this bag would be more common - nor does it really account for "*Base 10 g.p. gems which may increase to a maximum of 100 g.p. only." Surely, the gems have to be worth at least the minimum of 10 GP each, which puts it on par with the CP/EP/PP bag (10 GP = 2 PP). Further, the bag description does state you get 25 of each applicable type per day - not (5) 20 GP gems or (10) 10 GP gems - you get 25 gems out for the one gem you put in. Limiting it to 100 GP total means you get (25) 4 GP gems. ![]()
![]() So, I think I get how the purse works - whichever type you ended up rolling, you've got to have each type of coin/gem in the purse in order to get the benefits of the purse. If you don't have all three, you get none. You put in one of each three coin types, you wake up in the morning, and there's 25 more of each. You leave it empty for more than a few minutes, the magic is lost. The big question I have - say you roll up the variant that gives you gems? You put in the CP, EP and the gem, and you wake up, 25 more of each. There's this caveat: * Base 10 g.p. gems which may increase to a maximum of 100 g.p. only. So, do you roll for the value of each gem? Or all of them? Or is it based on the value of the gem you put in the bag the night before? I've never heard of this item before last night - busted open a factory set of the 1991 AD&D 2E trading cards, and this was in there - didn't have the full description that the 1E DMG did, and my buddy's 2E DMG is missing the table. Even then, while it's a bit more clear, was just curious how this was handled. Thanks! ![]()
![]() I've been able to get to the flagship HPB so far, in addition to Madness Games & Comics in Plano. Holy cow, Madness is impressive! Biggest game store I've seen to date. Only real drawback is pricing - they've got a TON of old d20 stuff, most of it looks new (I really didn't see much/any used stuff), and it's all cover price. I found a couple items where that pricing model worked out quite well for me, but in general, most of the stuff is overpriced at cover. Regardless, it was awesome to see shelves and shelves of d20 stuff - very reminiscent of the "golden age" of the d20 boom. HPB was pretty awesome, too, but I'm guessing I shouldn't expect to find deals on game stuff, if the location I was at is any indication. Used stores in my area tend to price gaming stuff just like they price other used books - half cover, or whatever arbitrary amount they decide to charge. HPB seems to do online comparisons or something - saw one of the 3.5 Complete books for $40. Ouch. Still, ended up dropping about $50 on used paperbacks. :) Going to try to hit up a couple more locations today or tomorrow. ![]()
![]() I'm going to be in Irving, TX for the next week - was curious if there's any shops that folks would consider to be a "must visit" kind of thing? More interested in out-of-print stuff than new stuff, but if there's some super-awesome place, I'd be interested in checking it out. I know that there's a number of Half Price Books down there, so I'll undoubtedly check at least a couple of those out. Anyplace else I should keep my eyes open for? Any used bookstores that specialize in gaming stuff? ![]()
![]() Kthulhu wrote:
Great idea. The errata notes would be a fantastic "behind the scenes" look at the developer's mindset behind the changes, and help to understand why they were made. Along with this, providing the errata for earlier editions - i.e. the CRB errata only shows errata between the print and 6th Edition. I'd like to be able to look at 1st to 2nd or 4th to 5th, as not everybody at the table has the same version of the book, and it would be incredibly helpful to see the differences. Certainly some of these existed at some point, if only as "1st to 2nd" and "1st to 3rd" and so forth. ![]()
![]() Chris Lambertz wrote: To take this in a slightly different direction, I have some questions for you guys from purely a site structure/community team standpoint: I'm only halfway through this thread, but: Chris Lambertz wrote: - Does having more accessible and visible introductions to our new design/development staff sound like something you want? (Either through our blog via tags or maybe our contact page?) Is there something we can do to the forums themselves to make employees more visible? Bio pages would be nice. It'd also be cool to see bio pages for past staff, noting that they're "no longer with us" or however, but just so you can kind of get an idea of what's going on if you're looking at older material. Chris Lambertz wrote: - Knowing how we've handled errata up until now, what would you change? If it's a blog, what general information would you like to see us include? A "history" style update, allowing someone to compare the previous version to the current would be awesome. Chris Lambertz wrote: - Are versioned PDFs a thing you'd use and want? MOST DEFINITELY. I've wanted this since the beginning. The way things stand now, I can have 6 people at my table, and each of them has a different version of the CRB. I would absolutely LOVE versioned PDFs that correspond to the print copies. |